Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):1776-1782. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa122.
Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria is a public health concern. Consequently, numerous government and agency reports discuss carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs). Unfortunately, these terms are fuzzy. Do they include (1) Proteeae with inherent imipenem resistance; (2) porin-deficient Enterobacterales resistant to ertapenem but not other carbapenems; (3) Enterobacterales with OXA-48-like enzymes that remain "carbapenem susceptible" at breakpoint; and (4) Pseudomonas aeruginosa that merely lack porin OprD? Counting CPE or CPOs is better but still insufficient, because different carbapenemases have differing treatment implications, particularly for new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. At the least, it is essential for authors, journals, and regulatory agencies to specify the carbapenemases meant. The future may demand even greater precision, for mutations can alter hydrolytic activity, and the ability to confer resistance, within carbapenemase families.
革兰氏阴性菌的碳青霉烯类耐药性是一个公共卫生关注点。因此,许多政府和机构报告都讨论了碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)和碳青霉烯类耐药菌(CRO)。不幸的是,这些术语比较模糊。它们包括以下内容吗:(1)固有耐亚胺培南的普罗威登斯菌属;(2)对厄他培南耐药但对其他碳青霉烯类药物敏感的孔蛋白缺陷型肠杆菌科;(3)具有 OXA-48 样酶的肠杆菌科,在折点处仍对碳青霉烯类“敏感”;(4)仅仅缺乏孔蛋白 OprD 的铜绿假单胞菌?计算 CPE 或 CPO 更好,但仍然不够,因为不同的碳青霉烯酶具有不同的治疗意义,尤其是对于新的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合。至少,作者、期刊和监管机构必须指定他们所指的碳青霉烯酶。未来可能需要更高的精度,因为突变可以改变碳青霉烯酶家族内的水解活性和耐药性。