Moret-Tatay C, Lami A, Oliveira C R, Beneyto-Arrojo M J
Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, calle Guillem de Castro 175, 46008, Valencia, Spain.
Universidad de València, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Jan 25;31(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41155-017-0082-8.
Emotions are considered distractions that often prompt subsequent actions. In this way, the aim of this work was to examine the role of distracting stimuli on the relationship of RT and accuracy. In order to do that, a word recognition task was carried out in which emotional valence was manipulated. More precisely, a mediational model, testing how changes in distracting stimuli mediate RT predicting accuracy across emotional conditions, was carried out. The results suggest that changes in task demands should distract from the secondary task to the extent that these task demands implicate and affect accuracy. Moreover, the distracting task seems to mediate between accuracy and the target task under emotional stimuli, showing the negative distracting condition to be the most remarkable effect. Furthermore, neutral distracting latencies did not affect accuracy. Understanding the mechanisms by which emotion impairs cognitive functions has important implications in several fields, such as affective disorders. However, the effects of emotion on goal-directed cognitive processing remain unclear.
情绪被视为常常引发后续行动的干扰因素。通过这种方式,本研究的目的是检验干扰刺激对反应时间(RT)和准确性之间关系的作用。为了做到这一点,进行了一项单词识别任务,其中情感效价受到操控。更确切地说,开展了一个中介模型,测试干扰刺激的变化如何在不同情绪条件下中介反应时间对准确性的预测。结果表明,任务需求的变化应会从次要任务上分散注意力,前提是这些任务需求涉及并影响准确性。此外,干扰任务似乎在情绪刺激下的准确性和目标任务之间起中介作用,显示出负面干扰条件的影响最为显著。此外,中性干扰潜伏期并不影响准确性。理解情绪损害认知功能的机制在多个领域具有重要意义,如情感障碍。然而,情绪对目标导向认知加工的影响仍不明确。