Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, United States.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Mar 4;125:93-108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
One major question in the cognitive neuroscience of cognitive control is whether prefrontal regions contribute to control by upregulating the processing of task-relevant material or by downregulating the processing of task-irrelevant material. Here we take a unique approach to addressing this question by using multi-voxel pattern analysis, which allowed us to determine the degree to which each of the task-relevant and task-irrelevant dimensions of a stimulus are being processed in posterior cortex on a trial-by-trial basis. In our study, adolescent participants performed an emotion word - emotional face Stroop task requiring them to determine the emotional valence (positive, negative) of a task-relevant word in the context of a task-irrelevant emotional face. Using mediation models, we determined whether activation of a major cognitive control region, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), influences reaction time on a trial-by-trial basis directly or if it does so indirectly by modulating processing of the task-relevant and/or task-irrelevant information in posterior brain regions. To examine the specificity of the effects observed for the DLPFC, similar analyses were performed for the amygdala, a brain region involved in processing of the salient task-irrelevant emotional information. For both congruent and incongruent trials, increased DLPFC activity on a given trial was associated with reduced perceptual processing of the task-irrelevant face, consistent with the idea that top-down cognitive control can modulate processing of task-irrelevant information. No effect of DLPFC activity was observed on processing of the task-relevant word. However, increased processing of the task-relevant word was associated with longer RT on congruent trials but not incongruent trials, which may reflect a need for greater processing of the task-relevant word to overcome any influence of the pre-potent task-irrelevant face. In a more exploratory aspect of our investigation, multi-level moderated mediation models were used to examine the influence of individual differences on the observed brain-behavior relationships. For congruent trials, the influence of task-irrelevant face processing on RT was decreased in individuals with higher self-reported Executive Control and increased in those with higher levels of self-reported Negative Affect. These results suggest that cognitive control regions in prefrontal cortex during adolescence can suppress the processing of task-irrelevant information in sensory cortex to influence performance (RT). The processing of task-relevant information may also influence performance, but such processing did not reveal evidence of being modulated by cognitive control regions. Moreover, these effects are sensitive to individual differences in the self-reported ability to exert cognitive and affective control. As such, we provide insights into the more precise mechanisms by which cognitive control influences task performance on a trial-by-trial basis during adolescence.
前额叶区域对控制的贡献是通过上调与任务相关的材料的处理,还是通过下调与任务不相关的材料的处理,这是认知神经科学中认知控制的一个主要问题。在这里,我们通过使用多体素模式分析来解决这个问题,这使我们能够确定在每次试验中,刺激的与任务相关和与任务不相关的维度在后部皮层中被处理的程度。在我们的研究中,青少年参与者执行了一项情绪词-情绪面孔 Stroop 任务,要求他们在与任务不相关的情绪面孔的背景下确定与任务相关的词的情绪效价(积极、消极)。使用中介模型,我们确定了在每次试验的基础上,背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的激活是否直接影响反应时间,或者是否通过调节后部大脑区域中与任务相关和/或与任务不相关的信息的处理来间接影响反应时间。为了检查观察到的 DLPFC 效应的特异性,对杏仁核(参与处理突出的与任务不相关的情绪信息的大脑区域)进行了类似的分析。对于一致和不一致的试验,给定试验中 DLPFC 活动的增加与对与任务不相关的面孔的感知处理的减少有关,这与自上而下的认知控制可以调节与任务不相关的信息处理的观点一致。在与任务相关的词的处理上没有观察到 DLPFC 活动的影响。然而,在一致的试验中,与任务相关的词的处理增加与 RT 较长有关,但在不一致的试验中则没有,这可能反映出需要对与任务相关的词进行更大的处理,以克服前置任务不相关面孔的任何影响。在我们研究的一个更具探索性的方面,使用多层次调节中介模型来检查个体差异对观察到的大脑-行为关系的影响。对于一致的试验,任务不相关的面孔处理对 RT 的影响在自我报告的执行控制能力较高的个体中降低,而在自我报告的消极情绪水平较高的个体中增加。这些结果表明,青春期前额叶皮层中的认知控制区域可以抑制感觉皮层中与任务不相关的信息处理,从而影响表现(RT)。与任务相关的信息的处理也可能影响表现,但这种处理没有显示出受到认知控制区域的调节。此外,这些效应对自我报告的认知和情感控制能力的个体差异敏感。因此,我们提供了有关认知控制如何在每次试验的基础上影响青少年任务表现的更精确机制的见解。