University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Jul;12(2):513-531. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12195. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
The Building Resources in Caregivers (BRiC) is a pilot feasibility trial that compared the effects of a 2-week benefit finding writing expressive intervention to a control intervention, who wrote about the weather. Caregivers completed primary (benefit finding) and secondary (quality of life, depression and anxiety) outcome measures at pre (t1), immediately post-test (t2) and 1 month later (t3). They also completed measures relating to trial feasibility, difficulty, and acceptance. Using complete case analysis only, analysis revealed no effect of the intervention for primary or secondary outcomes. Despite this, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups on key feasibility measures. Caregivers in the control condition were less likely to recommend this to other caregivers. Moreover, qualitative commentary provided by caregivers suggested that not everyone enjoyed the writing, some found it stressful, offering up some explanation for our findings. Our pilot trial suggests that any future benefit-finding writing intervention would require several procedure modifications including tailoring to a specific cohort of caregivers, in particular those who like writing, before it has some utility as a psychosocial intervention.
照顾者资源构建(BRiC)是一项试点可行性试验,比较了为期两周的益处发现写作表达干预与控制干预(即写天气)的效果。照顾者在预测试(t1)、即刻后测试(t2)和 1 个月后(t3)完成了主要(益处发现)和次要(生活质量、抑郁和焦虑)结局测量。他们还完成了与试验可行性、难度和接受度相关的测量。仅采用完整案例分析,分析显示干预对主要或次要结果均无影响。尽管如此,干预组和对照组在关键可行性措施上没有差异。控制组的照顾者不太可能将此推荐给其他照顾者。此外,照顾者提供的定性评论表明,并非每个人都喜欢写作,有些人觉得写作有压力,这为我们的发现提供了一些解释。我们的初步试验表明,任何未来的益处发现写作干预都需要进行一些程序修改,包括针对特定的照顾者群体进行调整,特别是那些喜欢写作的群体,然后才能将其作为一种心理社会干预措施发挥作用。