Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, NSW 2109, North Ryde, Australia.
Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, NSW 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Feb 6;32(Supplement_1):75-83. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz108.
Healthcare organisations vary in the degree to which they implement quality and safety systems and strategies. Large-scale cross-sectional studies have been implemented to explore whether this variation is associated with outcomes relevant at the patient level. The Deepening our Understanding of Quality in Australia (DUQuA) study draws from earlier research of this type, to examine these issues in 32 Australian hospitals. This paper outlines the key implementation and analysis challenges faced by DUQuA. Many of the logistical difficulties of implementing DUQuA derived from compliance with the administratively complex and time-consuming Australian ethics and governance system designed principally to protect patients involved in clinical trials, rather than for low-risk health services research. The complexity of these processes is compounded by a lack of organizational capacity for multi-site health services research; research is expected to be undertaken in addition to usual work, not as part of it. These issues likely contributed to a relatively low recruitment rate for hospitals (41% of eligible hospitals). Both sets of issues need to be addressed by health services researchers, policymakers and healthcare administrators, if health services research is to flourish. Large-scale research also inevitably involves multiple measurements. The timing for applying these measures needs to be coherent, to maximise the likelihood of finding real relationships between quality and safety systems and strategies, and patient outcomes; this timing was less than ideal in DUQuA, in part due to administrative delays. Other issues that affected our study include low response rates for measures requiring recruitment of clinicians and patients, missing data and a design that necessarily included multiple statistical comparisons. We discuss how these were addressed. Successful completion of these projects relies on mutual and ongoing commitment, and two-way communication between the research team and hospital staff at all levels. This will help to ensure that enthusiasm and engagement are established and maintained.
医疗机构在实施质量和安全系统及策略的程度上存在差异。已经开展了大规模的横断面研究,以探讨这种差异是否与患者层面的相关结果有关。深化我们对澳大利亚质量的理解(DUQuA)研究借鉴了早期的此类研究,在 32 家澳大利亚医院中检查这些问题。本文概述了 DUQuA 面临的关键实施和分析挑战。实施 DUQuA 遇到的许多后勤困难源于遵守澳大利亚行政复杂且耗时的伦理和治理系统,该系统主要旨在保护参与临床试验的患者,而不是为低风险的卫生服务研究提供保护。这些过程的复杂性因缺乏多地点卫生服务研究的组织能力而加剧;研究预计将在正常工作之外进行,而不是作为其一部分。这些问题可能导致医院的招募率相对较低(符合条件的医院中有 41%)。如果要开展卫生服务研究,卫生服务研究人员、政策制定者和医疗保健管理人员都需要解决这两组问题。大型研究还不可避免地涉及多项测量。应用这些措施的时间需要协调一致,以最大限度地提高在质量和安全系统及策略与患者结果之间找到真实关系的可能性;这一时间在 DUQuA 中并不理想,部分原因是行政延误。影响我们研究的其他问题包括需要招募临床医生和患者的措施的响应率低、数据缺失以及设计必须包括多个统计比较。我们讨论了如何解决这些问题。这些项目的成功完成依赖于研究团队和各级医院工作人员之间的相互和持续承诺以及双向沟通。这将有助于确保建立和保持热情和参与。