Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2021 Nov-Dec;69(8):959-970. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1719111. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Most sexual assault prevention approaches are universal in nature. The present study evaluated a Transtheoretical Model (TTM)-based Stages of Change (SOC) measure assessing readiness to utilize sexual assault risk reduction skills. The measure was evaluated with regard to Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy. Survey data were collected from 300 college women (=18.5, = 0.79). Three SOC measures were developed and evaluated for using: 1) assertive responding; 2) self-protective dating behaviors; and 3) open sexual communication. Item development was followed by exploratory, confirmatory, and external validation analyses. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) indicated two, six-item factors (Positive Outcomes α=.91; Negative Outcomes α=.85) for Decisional Balance. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) supported a two-factor correlated model, χ(66)=2101.70, <.001, CFI=.946, RMSEA=.083. For Self-Efficacy, EFA indicated one, six-item factor (α=.81). These readiness assessments may guide understanding of factors influencing sexual assault risk reduction program outcomes and aid in tailoring program content.
大多数性侵犯预防方法具有普遍性。本研究评估了基于跨理论模型(TTM)的阶段变化(SOC)测量方法,以评估利用性侵犯风险降低技能的准备情况。该方法通过决策平衡和自我效能来进行评估。从 300 名女大学生(年龄=18.5,SD=0.79)中收集了调查数据。开发并评估了三种 SOC 测量方法,用于:1)自信回应;2)自我保护约会行为;3)开放的性沟通。项目开发之后进行了探索性、验证性和外部验证分析。探索性因素分析(EFA)表明,决策平衡有两个六项目因素(积极结果α=.91;消极结果α=.85)。验证性因素分析(CFA)支持一个两因素相关模型,χ(66)=2101.70,<.001,CFI=.946,RMSEA=.083。对于自我效能感,EFA 表明有一个六项目因素(α=.81)。这些准备情况评估可以帮助了解影响性侵犯风险降低计划结果的因素,并有助于调整计划内容。