Shinohara Shuji, Manome Nobuhito, Suzuki Kouta, Chung Ung-Il, Takahashi Tatsuji, Gunji Pegio-Yukio, Nakajima Yoshihiro, Mitsuyoshi Shunji
Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Research and Development, SoftBank Robotics Group Corp, Tokyo, Japan.
Biosystems. 2020 Apr;190:104104. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104104. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
We start by proposing a causal induction model that incorporates symmetry bias. This model has two parameters that control the strength of symmetry bias and includes conditional probability and conventional models of causal induction as special cases. We calculated the determination coefficients between assessments by participants in eight types of causal induction experiments and the estimated values using the proposed model. The mean coefficient of determination was 0.93. Thus, it can reproduce causal induction of human judgment with high accuracy. We further propose a human-like Bayesian inference method to replace the conditional probability in Bayesian inference with the aforementioned causal induction model. In this method, two components coexist: the component of Bayesian inference, which updates the degree of confidence for each hypothesis, and the component of inverse Bayesian inference that modifies the model of each hypothesis. In other words, this method allows not only inference but also simultaneous learning. Our study demonstrates that the method addresses unsteady situations where the target of inference occasionally changes not only by making inferences based on knowledge (model) and observation data, but also by modifying the model itself.
我们首先提出一个包含对称性偏差的因果归纳模型。该模型有两个控制对称性偏差强度的参数,并将条件概率和传统因果归纳模型作为特殊情况包含在内。我们计算了八类因果归纳实验中参与者评估与使用所提模型的估计值之间的决定系数。平均决定系数为0.93。因此,它能够高精度地重现人类判断的因果归纳。我们进一步提出一种类人贝叶斯推理方法,用上述因果归纳模型替代贝叶斯推理中的条件概率。在这种方法中,两个组件并存:贝叶斯推理组件,它更新每个假设的置信度;以及逆贝叶斯推理组件,它修改每个假设的模型。换句话说,这种方法不仅允许推理,还允许同时学习。我们的研究表明,该方法通过基于知识(模型)和观测数据进行推理,以及通过修改模型本身,来处理推理目标偶尔变化的不稳定情况。