Chen Huifen, Cai Cong, Xie Jun
Department of Geratology, Houhu Branch, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(6):e18480. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018480.
This study aimed to synthetically evaluate the impact of intensive patients' education program (IEP) on anxiety, depression and patient global assessment (PGA) in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients.One hundred eighty DFU patients with Wagner grade 1 and Wagner grade 2 were consecutively recruited in this randomized, controlled study and randomly assigned to IEP group (N = 90) or control group (N = 90) as 1:1 ratio. In the IEP group, patients received the IEP and usual care, and patients in the control group received usual care only. IEP included educating patients and their family members, supervising patients' harmful habits and diets, psychological care for the patients and establishing a patient-physician-nurse WeChat group. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety/depression (HADS-A/D) and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety/depression Scale (SAS/SDS) were applied to assess anxiety/depression at M0-M3. PGA score was also assessed at M0-M3.For anxiety assessment, IEP group presented decreased HADS-A/SAS scores at M2/M3 and increased HADS-A/SAS score changes (M3-M0) compared to control group. For depression assessment, IEP group displayed reduced HADS-D/SDS scores at M2/M3 and raised SDS score change (M3-M0) compared to control group. Moreover, IEP group exhibited reduced PGA score at M1/M2/M3 and elevated PGA score change (M3-M0) compared to control group. Further subgroup analyses disclosed that IEP reduced HADS-A/SAS/HADS-D/PGA scores at M3 and elevated these score changes (M3-M0) in patients with Wagener grade 2 but not Wagener grade 1.IEP ameliorates anxiety, depression and PGA in DFU patients with Wagner grade 2 but not Wagner grade 1.
本研究旨在综合评估强化患者教育计划(IEP)对糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者焦虑、抑郁及患者整体评估(PGA)的影响。在这项随机对照研究中,连续招募了180例瓦格纳分级为1级和2级的DFU患者,并按1:1的比例随机分为IEP组(N = 90)或对照组(N = 90)。IEP组患者接受IEP及常规护理,对照组患者仅接受常规护理。IEP包括对患者及其家属进行教育、监督患者的不良习惯和饮食、对患者进行心理护理以及建立医患护微信交流群。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表-焦虑/抑郁(HADS-A/D)和zung自评焦虑/抑郁量表(SAS/SDS)在M0-M3评估焦虑/抑郁情况。在M0-M3也对PGA评分进行评估。对于焦虑评估,与对照组相比,IEP组在M2/M3时HADS-A/SAS评分降低,且HADS-A/SAS评分变化(M3-M0)增加。对于抑郁评估,与对照组相比,IEP组在M2/M3时HADS-D/SDS评分降低,且SDS评分变化(M3-M0)升高。此外,与对照组相比,IEP组在M1/M2/M3时PGA评分降低,且PGA评分变化(M3-M0)升高。进一步的亚组分析显示,IEP可降低瓦格纳2级患者在M3时的HADS-A/SAS/HADS-D/PGA评分,并提高这些评分变化(M3-M0),但对瓦格纳1级患者无此效果。IEP可改善瓦格纳2级而非1级DFU患者的焦虑、抑郁及PGA情况。