Kong Yek-Ching, Bhoo-Pathy Nirmala, O'Rorke Michael, Subramaniam Shridevi, Bhoo-Pathy Nanthini T, See Mee-Hoong, Jamaris Suniza, Teoh Kean-Hooi, Bustam Anita Z, Looi Lai-Meng, Taib Nur Aishah, Yip Cheng-Har
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, National Clinical Research Centre, Level 3, Dermatology Block, Kuala Lumpur Hospital.
Julius Centre University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(6):e19093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019093.
Percutaneous biopsy in breast cancer has been associated with an increased risk of malignant cell seeding. However, the importance of these observations remains obscure due to lack of corroborating evidence from clinical studies. We determined whether method of biopsy is associated with breast cancer survival. This hospital registry-based cohort study included 3416 non-metastatic breast cancer patients diagnosed from 1993 to 2011 in a tertiary setting. Factors associated with biopsy methods were assessed. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent prognostic impact of method of biopsy. Overall, 990 patients were diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB), 1364 by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and 1062 by excision biopsy. Excision biopsy was significantly associated with more favorable tumor characteristics. Radiotherapy modified the prognostic impact of biopsy method (Pinteraction < .001). Following multivariable analysis, excision biopsy was consistently associated with lower risk of mortality compared to FNAC in women receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.81, 95%CI: 0.66-0.99), but not in those who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.65-1.17). While the risk of mortality was not different between patients undergoing FNAC and CNB when radiotherapy is administered, in the absence of radiotherapy, CNB was associated with higher risk of mortality than FNAC (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.57, 95%CI: 1.16-2.12). Given that our results contradict with findings of previous clinical studies assessing the prognostic impact of method of biopsy in women with breast cancer, further studies are warranted.
乳腺癌的经皮活检与恶性细胞播散风险增加有关。然而,由于缺乏临床研究的确证性证据,这些观察结果的重要性仍不明确。我们确定活检方法是否与乳腺癌生存率相关。这项基于医院登记的队列研究纳入了1993年至2011年在三级医疗机构诊断的3416例非转移性乳腺癌患者。评估了与活检方法相关的因素。采用多变量Cox回归分析来确定活检方法的独立预后影响。总体而言,990例患者通过粗针活检(CNB)确诊,1364例通过细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)确诊,1062例通过切除活检确诊。切除活检与更有利的肿瘤特征显著相关。放疗改变了活检方法的预后影响(P交互作用<0.001)。多变量分析后,在接受辅助放疗的女性中,与FNAC相比,切除活检始终与较低的死亡风险相关(调整后的风险比:0.81,95%置信区间:0.66-0.99),但在未接受辅助放疗的女性中并非如此(调整后的风险比:0.87,95%置信区间:0.65-1.17)。当进行放疗时,接受FNAC和CNB的患者之间的死亡风险没有差异,但在没有放疗的情况下,CNB与比FNAC更高的死亡风险相关(调整后的风险比:1.57,95%置信区间:1.16-2.12)。鉴于我们的结果与之前评估活检方法对乳腺癌女性预后影响的临床研究结果相矛盾,有必要进行进一步研究。