CIAMS, University of Paris-Sud, University of Paris-Saclay, F-91405, Orsay Cedex, France.
CIAMS, University of Orléans, F-45067, Orléans, France.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Feb 7;28(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-0296-1.
Spinal manipulation (SM) has been shown to have an effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic subjects, but SM has never been compared in studies on this topic to a validated sham procedure. We investigated the effect of SM on the PPT when measured i) in the area of intervention and ii) in an area remote from the intervention. In addition, we measured the size and duration of the effect.
In a randomized cross-over trial, 50 asymptomatic chiropractic students had their PPT measured at baseline, immediately after and every 12 min after intervention, over a period of 45 min, comparing values after SM and a previously validated sham. The trial was conducted during two sessions, separated by 48 h. PPT was measured both regionally and remotely from the 'treated' thoracic segment. Blinding of study subjects was tested with a post-intervention questionnaire. We used mixed linear regression with the baseline value and time as co-variates. If a significant difference were found between groups, then an effect size would be calculated using Cohen's d or Hedge's h coefficient. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Study subjects had been successfully blinded. No statistically significant differences were found between SM and sham estimates, at any time or anatomical location.
When compared to a valid sham procedure and with successfully blinded subjects, there is no regional or remote effect of spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine on the pressure pain threshold in a young pain-free population.
脊柱推拿(SM)已被证明对无症状受试者的压痛阈(PPT)有影响,但在关于该主题的研究中,SM 从未与经过验证的假处理进行过比较。我们研究了当在干预区域内和 ii)在远离干预区域的区域测量时,SM 对 PPT 的影响。此外,我们还测量了影响的大小和持续时间。
在一项随机交叉试验中,50 名无症状的脊椎按摩学生在基线、干预后立即以及干预后每 12 分钟测量一次 PPT,持续 45 分钟,比较 SM 和之前验证的假处理后的数值。试验分两期进行,间隔 48 小时。PPT 是在“治疗”的胸椎区域和远离该区域的地方进行测量的。通过干预后的问卷调查来测试研究对象的盲法。我们使用混合线性回归,将基线值和时间作为协变量。如果发现组间存在显著差异,则使用 Cohen's d 或 Hedge's h 系数计算效应量。统计显著性设定为 p < 0.05。
研究对象已成功被蒙蔽。在任何时间或解剖位置,SM 和假处理的估计值之间均无统计学差异。
与有效的假处理程序和经过成功蒙蔽的受试者相比,在年轻无痛人群中,胸椎的脊柱推拿对压痛阈没有区域或远程影响。