Suppr超能文献

每周一次与每周两次治疗方案对抑郁患者心理治疗效果的影响。

The effects of once- versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients.

机构信息

Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;216(4):222-230. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.265.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear what session frequency is most effective in cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for depression.

AIMS

Compare the effects of once weekly and twice weekly sessions of CBT and IPT for depression.

METHOD

We conducted a multicentre randomised trial from November 2014 through December 2017. We recruited 200 adults with depression across nine specialised mental health centres in the Netherlands. This study used a 2 × 2 factorial design, randomising patients to once or twice weekly sessions of CBT or IPT over 16-24 weeks, up to a maximum of 20 sessions. Main outcome measures were depression severity, measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-II at baseline, before session 1, and 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 months after start of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Compared with patients who received weekly sessions, patients who received twice weekly sessions showed a statistically significant decrease in depressive symptoms (estimated mean difference between weekly and twice weekly sessions at month 6: 3.85 points, difference in effect size d = 0.55), lower attrition rates (n = 16 compared with n = 32) and an increased rate of response (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.00-2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice settings, delivery of twice weekly sessions of CBT and IPT for depression is a way to improve depression treatment outcomes.

摘要

背景

在认知行为疗法(CBT)和人际心理治疗(IPT)治疗抑郁症中,哪种治疗频率最有效尚不清楚。

目的

比较每周一次和每周两次 CBT 和 IPT 治疗抑郁症的效果。

方法

我们于 2014 年 11 月至 2017 年 12 月进行了一项多中心随机试验。我们在荷兰 9 个专门的精神卫生中心招募了 200 名患有抑郁症的成年人。本研究采用 2×2 析因设计,将患者随机分为每周一次或两次 CBT 或 IPT 治疗,疗程为 16-24 周,最多 20 次。主要结局指标为抑郁严重程度,采用贝克抑郁量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory-II)在基线、第 1 次治疗前、治疗开始后 2 周、1、2、3、4、5 和 6 个月进行测量。采用意向治疗分析。

结果

与每周接受治疗的患者相比,每周接受两次治疗的患者抑郁症状明显减轻(6 个月时每周和每周两次治疗的估计平均差异:3.85 分,效应大小差异 d = 0.55),脱落率降低(n = 16 与 n = 32),应答率增加(风险比 1.48,95%置信区间 1.00-2.18)。

结论

在临床实践环境中,提供每周两次的 CBT 和 IPT 治疗抑郁症是改善抑郁症治疗效果的一种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验