• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低血红蛋白阈值与高血红蛋白阈值输血对感染性休克患者的长期结局影响:TRISS 随机、多中心临床试验。

Long-term outcomes in patients with septic shock transfused at a lower versus a higher haemoglobin threshold: the TRISS randomised, multicentre clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1685-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4437-x. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-016-4437-x
PMID:27686345
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the predefined long-term outcomes in patients randomised in the Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial.

METHODS

In 32 Scandinavian ICUs, we randomised 1005 patients with septic shock and haemoglobin of 9 g/dl or less to receive single units of leuko-reduced red cells when haemoglobin level was 7 g/dl or less (lower threshold) or 9 g/dl or less (higher threshold) during ICU stay. We assessed mortality rates 1 year after randomisation and again in all patients at time of longest follow-up in the intention-to-treat population (n = 998) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 1 year after randomisation in the Danish patients only (n = 777).

RESULTS

Mortality rates in the lower- versus higher-threshold group at 1 year were 53.5 % (268/501 patients) versus 54.6 % (271/496) [relative risk 0.97; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.09; P = 0.62]; at longest follow-up (median 21 months), they were 56.7 % (284/501) versus 61.0 % (302/495) (hazard ratio 0.88; 95 % CI 0.75-1.03; P = 0.12). We obtained HRQoL data at 1 year in 629 of the 777 (81 %) Danish patients, and mean differences between the lower- and higher-threshold group in scores of physical HRQoL were 0.4 (95 % CI -2.4 to 3.1; P = 0.79) and in mental HRQoL 0.5 (95 % CI -3.1 to 4.0; P = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term mortality rates and HRQoL did not differ in patients with septic shock and anaemia who were transfused at a haemoglobin threshold of 7 g/dl versus a threshold of 9 g/dl. We may reject a more than 3 % increased hazard of death in the lower- versus higher-threshold group at the time of longest follow-up.

摘要

目的

我们评估了接受输血需求在脓毒症休克(TRISS)试验随机分组的患者的预先设定的长期结局。

方法

在 32 家斯堪的纳维亚 ICU 中,我们将 1005 例脓毒症休克且血红蛋白水平<9g/dl 的患者随机分为两组,当血红蛋白水平<7g/dl 时(较低阈值)或<9g/dl 时(较高阈值)给予单个去白细胞的红细胞单位。我们评估了随机分组后 1 年以及意向治疗人群中所有患者最长随访时间(n=998)时的死亡率,并在丹麦患者中仅评估了随机分组后 1 年的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)(n=777)。

结果

在较低阈值组与较高阈值组中,1 年的死亡率分别为 53.5%(268/501 例)和 54.6%(271/496 例)[相对风险 0.97;95%置信区间(CI)0.85-1.09;P=0.62];在最长随访时间(中位数 21 个月)时,死亡率分别为 56.7%(284/501 例)和 61.0%(302/495 例)(风险比 0.88;95%CI 0.75-1.03;P=0.12)。在 777 例丹麦患者中,我们获得了 1 年时的 HRQoL 数据,在较低阈值组与较高阈值组之间,身体 HRQoL 评分的平均差值为 0.4(95%CI-2.4 至 3.1;P=0.79),心理 HRQoL 评分的平均差值为 0.5(95%CI-3.1 至 4.0;P=0.79)。

结论

在血红蛋白阈值为 7g/dl 与 9g/dl 之间接受输血的脓毒症休克伴贫血患者中,长期死亡率和 HRQoL 无差异。我们可以排除在最长随访时间时较低阈值组与较高阈值组之间的死亡风险增加超过 3%的可能性。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes in patients with septic shock transfused at a lower versus a higher haemoglobin threshold: the TRISS randomised, multicentre clinical trial.低血红蛋白阈值与高血红蛋白阈值输血对感染性休克患者的长期结局影响:TRISS 随机、多中心临床试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1685-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4437-x. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
Benefits and harms of red blood cell transfusions in patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中感染性休克患者红细胞输血的益处与危害
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
3
Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock.较低与较高血红蛋白阈值用于感染性休克患者输血。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1381-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.严重脓毒症休克患者输血需求(TRISS)试验-比较 ICU 中严重脓毒症休克患者采用自由输血与限制输血策略的效果和安全性:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2013 May 23;14:150. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-150.
5
Is haemoglobin below 7.0 g/dL an optimal trigger for allogenic red blood cell transfusion in patients admitted to intensive care units? A meta-analysis and systematic review.血红蛋白水平低于 7.0 g/dL 是否为 ICU 患者输注异体红细胞的最佳触发点?一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e030854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030854.
6
Red blood cell transfusion during septic shock in the ICU.ICU 脓毒性休克患者的红细胞输注。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):718-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02666.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
Red blood cell transfusion in septic shock - clinical characteristics and outcome of unselected patients in a prospective, multicentre cohort.脓毒性休克患者的红细胞输注——一项前瞻性多中心队列研究中未经选择患者的临床特征及预后
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Feb 27;22:14. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-14.
8
Red blood cell transfusion strategies in critically ill patients: lessons from recent randomized clinical studies.危重症患者的红细胞输血策略:来自近期随机临床试验的教训。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Sep;82(9):1010-6. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
Higher vs. lower haemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock: subgroup analyses of the TRISS trial.脓毒性休克输血时较高与较低血红蛋白阈值的比较:TRISS试验的亚组分析
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Feb;61(2):166-175. doi: 10.1111/aas.12837. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Heterogenous treatment effects of transfusion thresholds by patient age: Post-hoc analysis of the TRISS trial.按患者年龄划分输血阈值的异质性治疗效果:TRISS 试验的事后分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 May;64(5):641-647. doi: 10.1111/aas.13538. Epub 2020 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
[Explanation and interpretation of blood transfusion provisions for critically ill and severely bleeding pediatric patients in the national health standard "Guideline for pediatric transfusion"].[《儿科输血指南》这一国家卫生标准中关于危重症及严重出血儿科患者输血规定的解释与解读]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Apr 15;27(4):395-403. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2501073.
2
Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult Sepsis Survivors Following Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.危重症成年脓毒症幸存者的健康相关生活质量:一项系统综述
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1238. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001238. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies on outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease in a non-cardiac surgery setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.非心脏手术中限制性与宽松输血策略对心血管疾病患者结局的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Mar 29;352:i1351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1351.
2
Liberal transfusion strategy improves survival in perioperative but not in critically ill patients. A meta-analysis of randomised trials.大量输血策略可改善围手术期患者的生存率,但不能改善危重症患者的生存率:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Oct;115(4):511-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev317.
3
Should blood transfusion be individualised? We are not sure.
Association between red blood cells transfusion and 28-day mortality rate in septic patients with concomitant chronic kidney disease.
合并慢性肾脏病的脓毒症患者红细胞输注与 28 天死亡率的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23769. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75643-3.
4
Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Critically Ill Adults: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.危重症成年患者的红细胞输注:美国胸科医师学会临床实践指南
Chest. 2025 Feb;167(2):477-489. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
5
Relationship between the magnitude of haemoglobin changes and long-term mortality in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.脓毒症患者血红蛋白变化幅度与长期死亡率的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09476-w.
6
Assessing the impact of transfusion thresholds in patients with septic acute kidney injury: a retrospective study.评估输血阈值对脓毒症急性肾损伤患者的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 21;10:1308275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1308275. eCollection 2023.
7
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值指导红细胞输血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
8
Management and prevention of anemia (acute bleeding excluded) in adult critical care patients.成人重症监护患者贫血(不包括急性出血)的管理与预防
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jul 22;10(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00711-6.
9
Recommendations on RBC Transfusion in Infants and Children With Acquired and Congenital Heart Disease From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative.儿科危重病输血和贫血专业知识倡议:关于获得性和先天性心脏病婴儿和儿童的 RBC 输血建议。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;19(9S Suppl 1):S137-S148. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001603.
10
Recommendations on RBC Transfusions for Critically Ill Children With Nonhemorrhagic Shock From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative.儿科危重病输血和贫血专业知识倡议:关于非出血性休克危重症儿童红细胞输注的建议。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;19(9S Suppl 1):S121-S126. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001620.
输血应该个体化吗?我们不确定。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Nov;41(11):1980-2. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4034-4. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
4
Should red cell transfusion be individualized? Yes.红细胞输注应该个体化吗?答案是肯定的。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Nov;41(11):1973-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3950-7. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
5
Should red blood cell transfusion be individualized? No.红细胞输血应该个体化吗?不应该。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Nov;41(11):1977-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3948-1. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
6
Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for red blood cell transfusion: systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.限制与宽松输血策略用于红细胞输血:系统评价随机试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 24;350:h1354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1354.
7
Liberal or restrictive transfusion after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后的自由输血或限制输血。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):997-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403612.
8
Liberal versus restrictive blood transfusion strategy: 3-year survival and cause of death results from the FOCUS randomised controlled trial.宽松与严格输血策略:FOCUS随机对照试验的3年生存率及死亡原因结果
Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1183-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62286-8. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock.较低与较高血红蛋白阈值用于感染性休克患者输血。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1381-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
10
Long-term outcomes in patients with severe sepsis randomised to resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 or Ringer's acetate.严重脓毒症患者接受羟乙基淀粉 130/0.42 或醋酸林格氏液复苏治疗的长期结局随机分组研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):927-34. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3311-y. Epub 2014 May 8.