Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Sep;105(5):545-549. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317888. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
In a previous audit, we demonstrated poor compliance with the neonatal resuscitation algorithm. Training can improve guideline compliance and performance. We aimed to prospectively collect detailed data on delivery room resuscitations to identify needs for educational interventions.
Observational study using video recordings of neonatal resuscitations. We analysed episodes where chest compressions (CCs) were provided.
A Norwegian university hospital.
All delivery room resuscitations August 2014 to November 2016.
The recordings were transcribed using Interact V.9 software (Mangold Int GmbH, Arnstorf, Germany). Supplementary information was collected from the patient electronic records.
Heart rate (HR) assessment, provision of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and CC, endotracheal intubation and team communication.
Twenty-nine CC episodes were analysed. We identified team discordance in the decisions to perform CC and only 6 (21%) were retrospectively judged to be in need for CC: 8 (28%) infants had adequate spontaneous respiration, 18 (62%) infants received ineffective PPV and 5 (17%) had a HR >60 bpm. Only one infant was intubated before CC, and we could not identify a consistent pattern of ventilation corrective actions. One infant received CC without prior HR assessment. In some infants, CC duration was exceedingly short, and 11 (38%) of the infants that received CC were not admitted to the NICU. Six (21%) infants had no documentation of CPR in the delivery record.
Education and training should focus on team function and communication, correct and timely HR assessment, effective PPV, and indications for endotracheal intubation.
在之前的审核中,我们发现新生儿复苏算法的依从性很差。培训可以提高指南的依从性和绩效。我们旨在前瞻性地收集产房复苏的详细数据,以确定教育干预的需求。
使用新生儿复苏的视频记录进行观察性研究。我们分析了提供胸外按压(CC)的情况。
挪威一家大学医院。
2014 年 8 月至 2016 年 11 月所有产房复苏。
使用 Interact V.9 软件(Mangold Int GmbH,Arnstorf,德国)对记录进行转录。从患者电子记录中收集补充信息。
心率(HR)评估、提供正压通气(PPV)和 CC、气管内插管和团队沟通。
分析了 29 个 CC 发作。我们发现团队在决定进行 CC 时存在分歧,只有 6 个(21%)被回顾性判断为需要 CC:8 个(28%)婴儿有足够的自主呼吸,18 个(62%)婴儿接受了无效的 PPV,5 个(17%)HR>60 bpm。只有一个婴儿在 CC 前被插管,我们无法确定通气纠正措施的一致模式。一个婴儿在没有进行 HR 评估的情况下接受了 CC。在一些婴儿中,CC 持续时间非常短,11 个(38%)接受 CC 的婴儿未被收治到新生儿重症监护病房。6 个(21%)婴儿的分娩记录中没有 CPR 的记录。
教育和培训应侧重于团队功能和沟通、正确和及时的 HR 评估、有效 PPV 以及气管内插管的指征。