Suppr超能文献

血清铁调素、铁调素/铁蛋白比值与 2 型糖尿病风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Serum Hepcidin, the Hepcidin/Ferritin Ratio and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.

出版信息

Curr Med Chem. 2021;28(6):1224-1233. doi: 10.2174/0929867327666200207120158.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To perform a meta-analysis on the relationship type 2 diabetes has with serum hepcidin and the hepcidin/ferritin ratio.

METHODS

The following databases were searched using all relevant keywords: Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar. All studies that examined the relationship type 2 diabetes has with serum hepcidin or the hepcidin/ferritin ratio were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review provided, were published in English between 2011 and 2018. A random-effects model was used to pool the standardized mean difference (SMD).

RESULTS

The SMD of serum hepcidin among patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls were compared across eight studies (n =878; n =2306). The pooled SMD of serum hepcidin did not differ significantly between study groups (SMD: 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.29 to 0.35). In contrast, the serum hepcidin/ferritin ratio was examined across five studies (n =229; n =1426) and was found to be negatively associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (SMD: -0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.85 to -0.19). There was no publication bias found for the associations serum hepcidin (Egger´s test: P =0.97) or the hepcidin/ferritin ratio (Egger´s test: P =0.75) had with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Although hepcidin has been proposed as a risk marker for type 2 diabetes, our metaanalysis found that the hepcidin/ferritin ratio was superior to hepcidin alone as a risk marker.

摘要

目的

对 2 型糖尿病与血清铁调素及铁调素/铁蛋白比值的关系进行荟萃分析。

方法

使用所有相关关键词在以下数据库中进行搜索:Web of Science、Medline、Scopus、Embase 和 Google Scholar。本荟萃分析和系统评价纳入了所有检查 2 型糖尿病与血清铁调素或铁调素/铁蛋白比值关系的研究,这些研究均发表于 2011 年至 2018 年期间的英文期刊。采用随机效应模型汇总标准化均数差(SMD)。

结果

比较了 8 项研究(n=878;n=2306)中 2 型糖尿病患者与健康对照者的血清铁调素 SMD。研究组间血清铁调素的 SMD 无显著差异(SMD:0.04;95%置信区间(CI):-0.29 至 0.35)。相比之下,共纳入了 5 项研究(n=229;n=1426)来检测血清铁调素/铁蛋白比值,发现其与 2 型糖尿病的发病风险呈负相关(SMD:-0.52;95%置信区间(CI):-0.85 至 -0.19)。未发现与 2 型糖尿病相关的血清铁调素(Egger 检验:P=0.97)或铁调素/铁蛋白比值(Egger 检验:P=0.75)存在发表偏倚。

结论

尽管铁调素已被提出作为 2 型糖尿病的风险标志物,但我们的荟萃分析发现,铁调素/铁蛋白比值作为风险标志物优于单独的铁调素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验