From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine (F. Vassalli, I.P., F.R., E.D., D.J.A., H.G., M. Bonifazi, M. Busana, M.M.M., L.G., P.H., G.H., O.M., M.Q., L.G.) Department of Experimental Animal Medicine (V.R.), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany Department of Adult Critical Care, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Health Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (F. Vasques) Department of Pathology, Lodi General Hospital, Lodi, Italy (O.L.) Regions Hospital and University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota (J.J.M.).
Anesthesiology. 2020 May;132(5):1126-1137. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003189.
Excessive tidal volume, respiratory rate, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are all potential causes of ventilator-induced lung injury, and all contribute to a single variable: the mechanical power. The authors aimed to determine whether high tidal volume or high respiratory rate or high PEEP at iso-mechanical power produce similar or different ventilator-induced lung injury.
Three ventilatory strategies-high tidal volume (twice baseline functional residual capacity), high respiratory rate (40 bpm), and high PEEP (25 cm H2O)-were each applied at two levels of mechanical power (15 and 30 J/min) for 48 h in six groups of seven healthy female piglets (weight: 24.2 ± 2.0 kg, mean ± SD).
At iso-mechanical power, the high tidal volume groups immediately and sharply increased plateau, driving pressure, stress, and strain, which all further deteriorated with time. In high respiratory rate groups, they changed minimally at the beginning, but steadily increased during the 48 h. In contrast, after a sudden huge increase, they decreased with time in the high PEEP groups. End-experiment specific lung elastance was 6.5 ± 1.7 cm H2O in high tidal volume groups, 10.1 ± 3.9 cm H2O in high respiratory rate groups, and 4.5 ± 0.9 cm H2O in high PEEP groups. Functional residual capacity decreased and extravascular lung water increased similarly in these three categories. Lung weight, wet-to-dry ratio, and histologic scores were similar, regardless of ventilatory strategies and power levels. However, the alveolar edema score was higher in the low power groups. High PEEP had the greatest impact on hemodynamics, leading to increased need for fluids. Adverse events (early mortality and pneumothorax) also occurred more frequently in the high PEEP groups.
Different ventilatory strategies, delivered at iso-power, led to similar anatomical lung injury. The different systemic consequences of high PEEP underline that ventilator-induced lung injury must be evaluated in the context of the whole body.
潮气量过大、呼吸频率过高和呼气末正压(PEEP)过高都是导致呼吸机相关性肺损伤的潜在原因,它们都归结为一个单一的变量:机械功率。作者旨在确定在等机械功率下,高潮气量、高呼吸频率或高 PEEP 是否会产生相似或不同的呼吸机相关性肺损伤。
在 6 组 7 只健康雌性小猪(体重:24.2±2.0kg,平均值±标准差)中,每种通气策略(高潮气量(2 倍基础功能残气量)、高呼吸频率(40bpm)和高 PEEP(25cmH2O))分别在 2 个机械功率水平(15 和 30J/min)下应用 48 小时。
在等机械功率下,高潮气量组立即急剧增加平台压、驱动压、应力和应变,这些参数随时间进一步恶化。在高呼吸频率组中,这些参数在开始时变化很小,但在 48 小时内逐渐增加。相比之下,在高 PEEP 组中,这些参数在经历突然的大幅增加后随时间而降低。实验结束时,高潮气量组的特定肺弹性阻力为 6.5±1.7cmH2O,高呼吸频率组为 10.1±3.9cmH2O,高 PEEP 组为 4.5±0.9cmH2O。这三组的功能残气量减少和血管外肺水增加相似。无论通气策略和功率水平如何,肺重量、湿干比和组织学评分均相似。然而,低功率组的肺泡水肿评分较高。高 PEEP 对血流动力学的影响最大,导致对液体的需求增加。不良事件(早期死亡率和气胸)也更多地发生在高 PEEP 组。
在等功率下,不同的通气策略导致相似的解剖学肺损伤。高 PEEP 对全身的不同影响强调了呼吸机相关性肺损伤必须在整个身体的背景下进行评估。