Suppr超能文献

机械通气功率和呼气末正压对雌性仔猪群体中中心型与混合型氧和二氧化碳相关变量的影响。

Impact of mechanical power and positive end expiratory pressure on central vs. mixed oxygen and carbon dioxide related variables in a population of female piglets.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Physiol Rep. 2024 Feb;12(4):e15954. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15954.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of the pulmonary artery catheter has decreased overtime; central venous blood gases are generally used in place of mixed venous samples. We want to evaluate the accuracy of oxygen and carbon dioxide related parameters from a central versus a mixed venous sample, and whether this difference is influenced by mechanical ventilation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 78 healthy female piglets ventilated with different mechanical power.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in oxygen-derived parameters between samples taken from the central venous and mixed venous blood (S O = 74.6%, ScvO2 = 83%, p < 0.0001). Conversely, CO2-related parameters were similar, with strong correlation. Ventilation with higher mechanical power and PEEP increased the difference between oxygen saturations, (Δ[ScvO2-S O ] = 7.22% vs. 10.0% respectively in the low and high MP groups, p = 0.020); carbon dioxide-related parameters remained unchanged (p = 0.344).

CONCLUSIONS

The venous oxygen saturation (central or mixed) may be influenced by the effects of mechanical ventilation. Therefore, central venous data should be interpreted with more caution when using higher mechanical power. On the contrary, carbon dioxide-derived parameters are more stable and similar between the two sampling sites, independently of mechanical power or positive end expiratory pressures.

摘要

简介

肺动脉导管的使用已逐渐减少;通常使用中心静脉血气来代替混合静脉样本。我们希望评估中心静脉与混合静脉样本中与氧和二氧化碳相关的参数的准确性,以及这种差异是否受机械通气的影响。

材料与方法

我们分析了 78 只接受不同机械通气的健康雌性小猪。

结果

从中心静脉和混合静脉血中采集的样本之间在氧衍生参数方面存在显著差异(S O =74.6%,ScvO2=83%,p<0.0001)。相反,CO2 相关参数相似,相关性较强。较高的机械通气和 PEEP 增加了氧饱和度之间的差异(在低和高 MP 组中,Δ[ScvO2-S O ]分别为 7.22%和 10.0%,p=0.020);二氧化碳相关参数保持不变(p=0.344)。

结论

静脉血氧饱和度(中心或混合)可能受到机械通气的影响。因此,在使用较高机械通气时,应更谨慎地解释中心静脉数据。相反,二氧化碳衍生参数在两个采样部位之间更稳定且相似,与机械通气或呼气末正压无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74be/10873162/ec0333941e6d/PHY2-12-e15954-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验