Suppr超能文献

艾考糊精与葡萄糖溶液在每日一次长时腹膜透析中的应用:一项基于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Icodextrin Versus Glucose Solutions for the Once-Daily Long Dwell in Peritoneal Dialysis: An Enriched Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health, Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.

Baxter Healthcare (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore; School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Renal Medicine, Counties Manukau District Health Board, New Zealand.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jun;75(6):830-846. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.004. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of icodextrin versus glucose-only peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimens is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare once-daily long-dwell icodextrin versus glucose among patients with kidney failure undergoing PD.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), enriched with unpublished data from investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored studies.

SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Individuals with kidney failure receiving regular PD treatment enrolled in clinical trials of dialysate composition.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi Web, 10 Chinese databases, clinical trials registries, conference proceedings, and citation lists from inception to November 2018. Further data were obtained from principal investigators and industry clinical study reports.

DATA EXTRACTION

2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

Qualitative synthesis of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative synthesis with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs), Peto odds ratios (ORs), or (standardized) mean differences (MDs). Risk of bias of included studies at the outcome level was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs.

RESULTS

19 RCTs that enrolled 1,693 participants were meta-analyzed. Ultrafiltration was improved with icodextrin (medium-term MD, 208.92 [95% CI, 99.69-318.14] mL/24h; high certainty of evidence), reflected also by fewer episodes of fluid overload (RR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.24-0.78]; high certainty). Icodextrin-containing PD probably decreased mortality risk compared to glucose-only PD (Peto OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-1.00]; moderate certainty). Despite evidence of lower peritoneal glucose absorption with icodextrin-containing PD (medium-term MD, -40.84 [95% CI, -48.09 to-33.59] g/long dwell; high certainty), this did not directly translate to changes in fasting plasma glucose (-0.50 [95% CI, -1.19 to 0.18] mmol/L; low certainty) and hemoglobin A levels (-0.14% [95% CI, -0.34% to 0.05%]; high certainty). Safety outcomes and residual kidney function were similar in both groups; health-related quality-of-life and pain scores were inconclusive.

LIMITATIONS

Trial quality was variable. The follow-up period was heterogeneous, with a paucity of assessments over the long term. Mortality results are based on just 32 events and were not corroborated using time-to-event analysis of individual patient data.

CONCLUSIONS

Icodextrin for once-daily long-dwell PD has clinical benefit for some patients, including those not meeting ultrafiltration targets and at risk for fluid overload. Future research into patient-centered outcomes and cost-effectiveness associated with icodextrin is needed.

摘要

背景与目的

关于艾考糊精与仅含葡萄糖的腹膜透析(peritoneal dialysis,PD)方案相比的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较失代偿期肾衰竭患者接受 PD 治疗时,每日 1 次长时留腹艾考糊精与葡萄糖方案。

研究设计

系统评价随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCT),并纳入来自研究者发起和行业资助研究的未发表数据。

研究场所和研究人群

在临床试验中接受常规 PD 治疗的肾衰竭患者。

研究选择标准

从研究开始到 2018 年 11 月,检索 Medline、Embase、CENTRAL、Ichushi Web、10 个中文数据库、临床试验注册库、会议论文集和参考文献列表。进一步的数据来自主要研究者和行业临床研究报告。

数据提取

2 名独立的审查员使用预定义的提取工具选择研究并提取数据。

分析方法

使用定性合成法对人口统计学、测量量表和结局进行分析。使用 Mantel-Haenszel 风险比(risk ratio,RR)、Peto 比值比(odds ratio,OR)或(标准化)均数差(mean difference,MD)进行定量合成。使用 Cochrane RCT 偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的结局水平的偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入 19 项 RCT,纳入 1693 名参与者进行荟萃分析。艾考糊精组超滤改善(中期 MD,208.92[95%可信区间,99.69-318.14]mL/24h;高确定性证据),也表现为液体超负荷发作减少(RR,0.43[95%可信区间,0.24-0.78];高确定性)。与仅含葡萄糖 PD 相比,艾考糊精组的死亡率风险可能降低(Peto OR,0.49[95%可信区间,0.24-1.00];中等确定性)。尽管有证据表明艾考糊精组腹膜葡萄糖吸收减少(中期 MD,-40.84[95%可信区间,-48.09 至-33.59]g/长时留腹;高确定性),但这并未直接转化为空腹血糖(-0.50[95%可信区间,-1.19 至 0.18]mmol/L;低确定性)和血红蛋白 A 水平(-0.14%[95%可信区间,-0.34%至 0.05%];高确定性)的变化。两组的安全性结局和残余肾功能相似;健康相关生活质量和疼痛评分结果不确定。

局限性

试验质量参差不齐。随访时间存在异质性,长期随访评估不足。死亡率结果仅基于 32 例事件,未使用个体患者数据的时间至事件分析加以证实。

结论

对于部分患者,包括未达到超滤目标和存在液体超负荷风险的患者,每日 1 次长时留腹艾考糊精 PD 具有临床获益。需要进一步研究与艾考糊精相关的以患者为中心的结局和成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验