• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾考糊精与葡萄糖溶液在每日一次长时腹膜透析中的应用:一项基于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Icodextrin Versus Glucose Solutions for the Once-Daily Long Dwell in Peritoneal Dialysis: An Enriched Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health, Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.

Baxter Healthcare (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore; School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Renal Medicine, Counties Manukau District Health Board, New Zealand.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jun;75(6):830-846. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.004. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.004
PMID:32033860
Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of icodextrin versus glucose-only peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimens is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare once-daily long-dwell icodextrin versus glucose among patients with kidney failure undergoing PD.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), enriched with unpublished data from investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored studies.

SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Individuals with kidney failure receiving regular PD treatment enrolled in clinical trials of dialysate composition.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi Web, 10 Chinese databases, clinical trials registries, conference proceedings, and citation lists from inception to November 2018. Further data were obtained from principal investigators and industry clinical study reports.

DATA EXTRACTION

2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

Qualitative synthesis of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative synthesis with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs), Peto odds ratios (ORs), or (standardized) mean differences (MDs). Risk of bias of included studies at the outcome level was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs.

RESULTS

19 RCTs that enrolled 1,693 participants were meta-analyzed. Ultrafiltration was improved with icodextrin (medium-term MD, 208.92 [95% CI, 99.69-318.14] mL/24h; high certainty of evidence), reflected also by fewer episodes of fluid overload (RR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.24-0.78]; high certainty). Icodextrin-containing PD probably decreased mortality risk compared to glucose-only PD (Peto OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-1.00]; moderate certainty). Despite evidence of lower peritoneal glucose absorption with icodextrin-containing PD (medium-term MD, -40.84 [95% CI, -48.09 to-33.59] g/long dwell; high certainty), this did not directly translate to changes in fasting plasma glucose (-0.50 [95% CI, -1.19 to 0.18] mmol/L; low certainty) and hemoglobin A levels (-0.14% [95% CI, -0.34% to 0.05%]; high certainty). Safety outcomes and residual kidney function were similar in both groups; health-related quality-of-life and pain scores were inconclusive.

LIMITATIONS

Trial quality was variable. The follow-up period was heterogeneous, with a paucity of assessments over the long term. Mortality results are based on just 32 events and were not corroborated using time-to-event analysis of individual patient data.

CONCLUSIONS

Icodextrin for once-daily long-dwell PD has clinical benefit for some patients, including those not meeting ultrafiltration targets and at risk for fluid overload. Future research into patient-centered outcomes and cost-effectiveness associated with icodextrin is needed.

摘要

背景与目的

关于艾考糊精与仅含葡萄糖的腹膜透析(peritoneal dialysis,PD)方案相比的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较失代偿期肾衰竭患者接受 PD 治疗时,每日 1 次长时留腹艾考糊精与葡萄糖方案。

研究设计

系统评价随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCT),并纳入来自研究者发起和行业资助研究的未发表数据。

研究场所和研究人群

在临床试验中接受常规 PD 治疗的肾衰竭患者。

研究选择标准

从研究开始到 2018 年 11 月,检索 Medline、Embase、CENTRAL、Ichushi Web、10 个中文数据库、临床试验注册库、会议论文集和参考文献列表。进一步的数据来自主要研究者和行业临床研究报告。

数据提取

2 名独立的审查员使用预定义的提取工具选择研究并提取数据。

分析方法

使用定性合成法对人口统计学、测量量表和结局进行分析。使用 Mantel-Haenszel 风险比(risk ratio,RR)、Peto 比值比(odds ratio,OR)或(标准化)均数差(mean difference,MD)进行定量合成。使用 Cochrane RCT 偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的结局水平的偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入 19 项 RCT,纳入 1693 名参与者进行荟萃分析。艾考糊精组超滤改善(中期 MD,208.92[95%可信区间,99.69-318.14]mL/24h;高确定性证据),也表现为液体超负荷发作减少(RR,0.43[95%可信区间,0.24-0.78];高确定性)。与仅含葡萄糖 PD 相比,艾考糊精组的死亡率风险可能降低(Peto OR,0.49[95%可信区间,0.24-1.00];中等确定性)。尽管有证据表明艾考糊精组腹膜葡萄糖吸收减少(中期 MD,-40.84[95%可信区间,-48.09 至-33.59]g/长时留腹;高确定性),但这并未直接转化为空腹血糖(-0.50[95%可信区间,-1.19 至 0.18]mmol/L;低确定性)和血红蛋白 A 水平(-0.14%[95%可信区间,-0.34%至 0.05%];高确定性)的变化。两组的安全性结局和残余肾功能相似;健康相关生活质量和疼痛评分结果不确定。

局限性

试验质量参差不齐。随访时间存在异质性,长期随访评估不足。死亡率结果仅基于 32 例事件,未使用个体患者数据的时间至事件分析加以证实。

结论

对于部分患者,包括未达到超滤目标和存在液体超负荷风险的患者,每日 1 次长时留腹艾考糊精 PD 具有临床获益。需要进一步研究与艾考糊精相关的以患者为中心的结局和成本效益。

相似文献

1
Icodextrin Versus Glucose Solutions for the Once-Daily Long Dwell in Peritoneal Dialysis: An Enriched Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.艾考糊精与葡萄糖溶液在每日一次长时腹膜透析中的应用:一项基于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jun;75(6):830-846. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.004. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis.用于腹膜透析的生物相容性透析液。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 26;10(10):CD007554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007554.pub3.
3
The role of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.艾考糊精在腹膜透析中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 30;8(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0959-y.
4
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis.用于腹膜透析的生物相容性透析液。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 27(3):CD007554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007554.pub2.
5
Comparison of icodextrin and glucose solutions for long dwell exchange in peritoneal dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.对比腹腔透析中长留置交换时使用艾考糊精和葡萄糖溶液的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Perit Dial Int. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):179-88. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00264. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
6
Impact of icodextrin on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.聚蔗糖对腹膜透析临床结局影响的系统评价:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Jul;28(7):1899-907. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft050. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Automated peritoneal dialysis prescriptions for enhancing sodium and fluid removal: a predictive analysis of optimized, patient-specific dwell times for the day period.优化、个体化日间单次留腹时间以提高钠和液体清除率的自动化腹膜透析处方:预测分析。
Perit Dial Int. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):646-54. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00261.
8
Icodextrin: a review of its use in peritoneal dialysis.艾考糊精:其在腹膜透析中应用的综述
Drugs. 2003;63(19):2079-105. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363190-00011.
9
Superiority of icodextrin compared with 4.25% dextrose for peritoneal ultrafiltration.与4.25%葡萄糖相比,艾考糊精在腹膜超滤方面的优势。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Feb;16(2):546-54. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004090793. Epub 2004 Dec 29.
10
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease.紧急启动腹膜透析与常规启动腹膜透析治疗慢性肾脏病患者的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 15;12(12):CD012913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012913.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes on Peritoneal Dialysis: From Glucose Sparing Approach to Glucose Monitoring.腹膜透析糖尿病患者的血糖控制:从节约葡萄糖方法到血糖监测
Life (Basel). 2025 May 17;15(5):798. doi: 10.3390/life15050798.
2
Evidence Summary of Personalized Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Volume in Adults.成人腹膜透析容量个体化管理的证据总结
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 May 15;18:2707-2719. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S516563. eCollection 2025.
3
Current Progress in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Narrative Review of Progress in Peritoneal Dialysis Fluid.
腹膜透析的当前进展:腹膜透析液进展的叙述性综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;15(2):279. doi: 10.3390/life15020279.
4
Icodextrin versus Glucose 2.5% on markers of hypervolemia and survival of patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis with an unplanned start: a randomized controlled trial.与2.5%葡萄糖相比,艾考糊精对计划外开始的自动化腹膜透析患者高血容量标志物及生存情况的影响:一项随机对照试验
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 6;22:eAO0980. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0980. eCollection 2024.
5
Glucose-Free Solutions Mediated Inhibition of Oxidative Stress and Oxidative Stress-Related Damages in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Promising Solution.无糖溶液介导的腹膜透析中氧化应激及氧化应激相关损伤的抑制作用:一种有前景的解决方案
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 18;14(9):1173. doi: 10.3390/life14091173.
6
Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Dialysis Patients: A Challenging but Rewarding Path.透析患者慢性心力衰竭的管理:一条充满挑战但回报丰厚的道路。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 25;25(6):232. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506232. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Can one long peritoneal dwell with icodextrin replace two short dwells with glucose?一次使用艾考糊精进行长时间腹腔留置能否替代两次使用葡萄糖进行的短时间留置?
Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1339762. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1339762. eCollection 2024.
8
PET Testing Has Utility in the Prescription of Peritoneal Dialysis: Commentary.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)检测在腹膜透析处方制定中有实用价值:评论
Kidney360. 2024 Dec 1;5(12):1797-1798. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000409. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
The impact of icodextrin on the outcomes of incident peritoneal dialysis patients.聚蔗糖对新发腹膜透析患者结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0297688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297688. eCollection 2024.
10
Coupling Osmotic Efficacy with Biocompatibility in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Stiff Challenge.在腹膜透析中实现渗透效能与生物相容性的偶联:一项艰巨的挑战。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 20;25(6):3532. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063532.