• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of latent typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms across military personnel from India and the US.比较印度和美国军人创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的潜在类型。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Mar;70:102195. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102195. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Typologies of Combat Exposure and Their Effects on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression Symptoms.战斗暴露的类型及其对创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的影响。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Dec;32(6):946-956. doi: 10.1002/jts.22459. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
3
Typologies of PTSD clusters and reckless/self-destructive behaviors: A latent profile analysis.创伤后应激障碍集群和鲁莽/自毁行为的类型学:潜在剖面分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Feb;272:682-691. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.124. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
4
Latent profile analyses of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression and generalized anxiety disorder symptoms in trauma-exposed soldiers.创伤暴露士兵创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症症状的潜在剖面分析
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Sep;68:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 30.
5
Heterogeneity in the Co-occurrence of Substance Use and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Latent Class Analysis Approach.物质使用与创伤后应激障碍共病的异质性:潜在类别分析方法。
J Dual Diagn. 2019 Apr-Jun;15(2):105-117. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2019.1572258. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder in treatment-seeking older adults.寻求治疗的老年创伤后应激障碍的类型学。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Mar;27(3):501-9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002026. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
Posttraumatic stress symptoms across the deployment cycle: A latent transition analysis.部署周期中的创伤后应激症状:潜在转变分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;83:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
8
Typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder in the U.S. adult population.美国成年人群体中创伤后应激障碍的类型
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jun;162:102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
9
Centrally Assisted Collaborative Telecare for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression Among Military Personnel Attending Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.中心辅助协同远程关爱在基层医疗就诊的军事人员创伤后应激障碍和抑郁:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):948-56. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2402.
10
Patterns of comorbid PTSD, depression, alcohol use disorder, and insomnia symptoms in firefighters: A latent profile analysis.消防员创伤后应激障碍、抑郁、酒精使用障碍和失眠症状共病模式:潜在剖面分析。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jul 1;356:338-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.159. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring heterogeneity in PTSD symptoms and associated predictors and outcomes in Afghanistan veterans: A latent profile analysis.探索阿富汗退伍军人创伤后应激障碍症状的异质性及其相关预测因素和结果:一项潜在类别分析。
Mil Psychol. 2025;37(3):208-219. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2024.2345580. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Exploring transdiagnostic stress and trauma-related symptoms across the world: a latent class analysis.探索全球范围内的共病压力和与创伤相关的症状:潜在类别分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2318190. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2318190. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Victims of armed conflict in India: psychosocial impact and available support.印度武装冲突中的受害者:心理社会影响和现有支持。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2178375. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2178375.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of the co-occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder and depressive disorder in psychiatric outpatients.精神科门诊患者创伤后应激障碍和抑郁障碍共病的预测因素。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;89:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
2
Exploring heterogeneity in clinical trials with latent class analysis.用潜在类别分析探索临床试验中的异质性。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Apr;6(7):119. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.01.24.
3
Co-occurring patterns of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression among flood victims: A latent profile analysis.洪灾受害者创伤后应激障碍和抑郁共病模式:潜在剖面分析。
J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(10-11):1543-1555. doi: 10.1177/1359105318763505. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Heterogeneity in patterns of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms: Latent profile analyses.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状模式的异质性:潜在类别分析
J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 1;212:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.029. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
5
The epidemiology of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III.美国精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版创伤后应激障碍的流行病学:来自酒精及相关疾病全国流行病学调查-III的结果
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;51(8):1137-48. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1208-5. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
6
The class-dimensional structure of PTSD before and after deployment to Iraq: Evidence from direct comparison of dimensional, categorical, and hybrid models.部署到伊拉克前后创伤后应激障碍的类别维度结构:来自维度、类别和混合模型直接比较的证据。
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 Apr;39:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Risk of depressive disorder following disasters and military deployment: systematic review with meta-analysis.灾难和军事部署后发生抑郁障碍的风险:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;208(4):330-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157859. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members.寻求治疗的军人中创伤后应激障碍检查表-5(PCL-5)的心理测量分析。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1392-1403. doi: 10.1037/pas0000260. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Comorbidity between post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder: alternative explanations and treatment considerations.创伤后应激障碍与重度抑郁症之间的共病:其他解释及治疗考量
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jun;17(2):141-50. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.2/jflory.
10
Patterns of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms in an epidemiological sample of Chinese earthquake survivors: A latent profile analysis.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状在地震幸存者流行病学样本中的模式:潜在剖面分析。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 1;186:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.058. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

比较印度和美国军人创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的潜在类型。

Comparison of latent typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms across military personnel from India and the US.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, United States.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Mar;70:102195. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102195. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102195
PMID:32035292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7074844/
Abstract

Research has identified heterogeneous subgroups of individuals based on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms. Using data collected from military personnel in India (N = 146) and U.S. (N = 194), we examined (1) the best-fitting latent class solution; (2) multi-group invariance of the class solution; and (3) construct validity of optimal class solution. Results indicated that the optimal 4-class solution differed in severity and severity/type in the India and U.S. samples respectively. With similarity in the optimal number of classes across cultural samples, the meaning/nature of classes differed. In the India sample, anxiety severity predicted the Low Severity Class vs. all other classes, and the Moderately High Severity/High Severity Classes vs. the Moderately Low Severity Class; number of traumas predicted the High Severity Class vs. other classes; and resilience predicted the Moderately Low Severity Class vs. the Moderately High Severity Class. In the U.S. sample, alcohol use predicted the High Severity Class vs. all other classes, and the High Depression-Low PTSD Class vs. the Low Severity Class; rumination significantly predicted the High Severity and High Depression-Low PTSD Classes vs. each of the High PTSD-Low Depression and Low Severity Classes. Thus, meaning and nature of PTSD-depression subgroups may vary culturally; hence, culturally-sensitive interventions need to account for this heterogeneity.

摘要

研究已经根据创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症状确定了个体的异质亚组。利用从印度(N=146)和美国(N=194)军人那里收集的数据,我们检验了:(1)最佳潜在类别解决方案;(2)类别解决方案的多群组不变性;(3)最优类别解决方案的构建有效性。结果表明,在印度和美国样本中,最优的 4 类解决方案在严重程度和严重程度/类型上存在差异。虽然文化样本中最优类别数量相似,但类别的含义/性质不同。在印度样本中,焦虑严重程度预测了低严重度类别与所有其他类别,以及中度高严重度/高严重度类别与中度低严重度类别之间的差异;创伤数量预测了高严重度类别与其他类别之间的差异;而复原力则预测了中度低严重度类别与中度高严重度类别之间的差异。在美国样本中,酒精使用预测了高严重度类别与所有其他类别,以及高抑郁-低 PTSD 类别与低严重度类别之间的差异;反刍显著预测了高严重度和高抑郁-低 PTSD 类别与高 PTSD-低抑郁和低严重度类别中的每一个类别之间的差异。因此,PTSD-抑郁亚组的含义和性质可能存在文化差异;因此,需要考虑到这种异质性,进行文化敏感的干预。