Suppr超能文献

比较印度和美国军人创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的潜在类型。

Comparison of latent typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms across military personnel from India and the US.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, United States.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Mar;70:102195. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102195. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Abstract

Research has identified heterogeneous subgroups of individuals based on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms. Using data collected from military personnel in India (N = 146) and U.S. (N = 194), we examined (1) the best-fitting latent class solution; (2) multi-group invariance of the class solution; and (3) construct validity of optimal class solution. Results indicated that the optimal 4-class solution differed in severity and severity/type in the India and U.S. samples respectively. With similarity in the optimal number of classes across cultural samples, the meaning/nature of classes differed. In the India sample, anxiety severity predicted the Low Severity Class vs. all other classes, and the Moderately High Severity/High Severity Classes vs. the Moderately Low Severity Class; number of traumas predicted the High Severity Class vs. other classes; and resilience predicted the Moderately Low Severity Class vs. the Moderately High Severity Class. In the U.S. sample, alcohol use predicted the High Severity Class vs. all other classes, and the High Depression-Low PTSD Class vs. the Low Severity Class; rumination significantly predicted the High Severity and High Depression-Low PTSD Classes vs. each of the High PTSD-Low Depression and Low Severity Classes. Thus, meaning and nature of PTSD-depression subgroups may vary culturally; hence, culturally-sensitive interventions need to account for this heterogeneity.

摘要

研究已经根据创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症状确定了个体的异质亚组。利用从印度(N=146)和美国(N=194)军人那里收集的数据,我们检验了:(1)最佳潜在类别解决方案;(2)类别解决方案的多群组不变性;(3)最优类别解决方案的构建有效性。结果表明,在印度和美国样本中,最优的 4 类解决方案在严重程度和严重程度/类型上存在差异。虽然文化样本中最优类别数量相似,但类别的含义/性质不同。在印度样本中,焦虑严重程度预测了低严重度类别与所有其他类别,以及中度高严重度/高严重度类别与中度低严重度类别之间的差异;创伤数量预测了高严重度类别与其他类别之间的差异;而复原力则预测了中度低严重度类别与中度高严重度类别之间的差异。在美国样本中,酒精使用预测了高严重度类别与所有其他类别,以及高抑郁-低 PTSD 类别与低严重度类别之间的差异;反刍显著预测了高严重度和高抑郁-低 PTSD 类别与高 PTSD-低抑郁和低严重度类别中的每一个类别之间的差异。因此,PTSD-抑郁亚组的含义和性质可能存在文化差异;因此,需要考虑到这种异质性,进行文化敏感的干预。

相似文献

6
Typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder in treatment-seeking older adults.寻求治疗的老年创伤后应激障碍的类型学。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Mar;27(3):501-9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002026. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder in the U.S. adult population.美国成年人群体中创伤后应激障碍的类型
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jun;162:102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验