School of Kinesiology & Physical Therapy, Division of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA. Electronic address: https://
Phys Ther Sport. 2020 May;43:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
Little is known regarding the variables or mechanisms mediating cross-education as a result of resistance training. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of low-load eccentric-only blood flow restriction (Ecc-BFR) and low-load concentric-only BFR (Con-BFR) on indices of cross-education.
Thirty-six women were randomly assigned to 4-wks of unilateral resistance training with Ecc-BFR (n = 12), Con-BFR (n = 12) or control (no intervention, n = 12) group. Eccentric peak torque, concentric peak torque, maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque, muscle thickness, and muscle activation were assessed from the contralateral, untrained arm.
Muscle strength (collapsed across mode) increased from 0-wk to 2-wks (4.9%) and 4-wks (13.0%) for Ecc-BFR only. There were increases in muscle activation (collapsed across mode and group) regardless of training modality, but there were no changes in muscle size for any of the conditions.
The findings of the present study indicated that low-load Ecc-BFR increased muscle strength. The increases in muscle strength as a result of Ecc-BFR were not mode-specific. Thus, low-load Ecc-BFR provides a unique alternative to maintain muscle function in an untrained limb that may have application during limb immobilization and rehabilitation practices.
关于抗阻训练引起交叉教育的变量或机制知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是检验低负荷离心向心血流限制(Ecc-BFR)和低负荷向心血流限制(Con-BFR)对交叉教育指标的影响。
36 名女性被随机分配到 4 周的单侧抗阻训练,Ecc-BFR(n=12)、Con-BFR(n=12)或对照组(无干预,n=12)。从对侧未训练手臂评估离心峰力矩、向心峰力矩、最大自主等长收缩力矩、肌肉厚度和肌肉激活。
仅 Ecc-BFR 的肌肉力量(跨模式合并)从 0 周增加到 2 周(4.9%)和 4 周(13.0%)。无论训练模式如何,肌肉激活都增加(跨模式和组合并),但任何情况下肌肉大小都没有变化。
本研究的结果表明,低负荷离心向心血流限制可增加肌肉力量。Ecc-BFR 引起的肌肉力量增加不是特定于模式的。因此,低负荷离心向心血流限制为不训练肢体维持肌肉功能提供了一种独特的替代方法,在肢体固定和康复实践中可能具有应用价值。