Suppr超能文献

低强度血流限制抗阻训练导致的肌肉力量和肥大的早期适应。

Early phase adaptations in muscle strength and hypertrophy as a result of low-intensity blood flow restriction resistance training.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 110 Ruth Leverton Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0806, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Sep;118(9):1831-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3918-8. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Low-intensity venous blood flow restriction (vBFR) resistance training has been shown to promote increases in muscle strength and size. Eccentric-only muscle actions are typically a more potent stimulus to increase muscle strength and size than concentric-only muscle actions performed at the same relative intensities. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the time-course of changes in muscle strength, hypertrophy, and neuromuscular adaptations following 4 weeks of unilateral forearm flexion low-intensity eccentric vBFR (Ecc-vBFR) vs. low-intensity concentric vBFR (Con-vBFR) resistance training performed at the same relative intensity.

METHODS

Thirty-six women were randomly assigned to either Ecc-vBFR (n = 12), Con-vBFR (n = 12) or control (no intervention, n = 12) group. Ecc-vBFR trained at 30% of eccentric peak torque and Con-vBFR trained at 30% of concentric peak torque. All training and testing procedures were performed at an isokinetic velocity of 120° s¹.

RESULTS

Muscle strength increased similarly from 0 to 2 and 4 weeks of training as a result of Ecc-vBFR (13.9 and 35.0%) and Con-vBFR (13.4 and 31.2%), but there were no changes in muscle strength for the control group. Muscle thickness increased similarly from 0 to 2 and 4 weeks of training as a result of Ecc-vBFR (11.4 and 12.8%) and Con-vBFR (9.1 and 9.9%), but there were no changes for the control group. In addition, there were no changes in any of the neuromuscular responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ecc-vBFR and Con-vBFR low-intensity training induced comparable increases in muscle strength and size. The increases in muscle strength, however, were not associated with neuromuscular adaptations.

摘要

目的

低强度静脉血流限制(vBFR)阻力训练已被证明可促进肌肉力量和体积的增加。与在相同相对强度下进行的单纯向心肌肉运动相比,单纯离心肌肉运动通常是增加肌肉力量和体积的更有效刺激。因此,本研究的目的是检查在相同相对强度下进行的 4 周单侧前臂低强度离心 vBFR(Ecc-vBFR)与低强度向心 vBFR(Con-vBFR)阻力训练后,肌肉力量、肥大和神经肌肉适应性的变化时间过程。

方法

36 名女性被随机分配到 Ecc-vBFR(n=12)、Con-vBFR(n=12)或对照组(无干预,n=12)。Ecc-vBFR 以 30%的离心峰值扭矩进行训练,Con-vBFR 以 30%的向心峰值扭矩进行训练。所有训练和测试程序均在等速速度为 120°/s¹下进行。

结果

由于 Ecc-vBFR(13.9%和 35.0%)和 Con-vBFR(13.4%和 31.2%),肌肉力量从 0 周到 2 周和 4 周的训练都相似地增加,但对照组的肌肉力量没有变化。由于 Ecc-vBFR(11.4%和 12.8%)和 Con-vBFR(9.1%和 9.9%),肌肉厚度从 0 周到 2 周和 4 周的训练都相似地增加,但对照组没有变化。此外,神经肌肉反应没有任何变化。

结论

Ecc-vBFR 和 Con-vBFR 低强度训练均可引起肌肉力量和体积的相似增加。然而,肌肉力量的增加与神经肌肉适应性无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验