Suppr超能文献

在临床实践中预测癫痫手术的结果:预测模型与临床敏锐度。

Predicting outcome of epilepsy surgery in clinical practice: Prediction models vs. clinical acumen.

作者信息

Fassin Anne Katharina, Knake Susanne, Strzelczyk Adam, Josephson Colin B, Reif Philipp S, Haag Anja, Carl Barbara, Hermsen Anke M, Gorny Iris, Möller Leona, Pagenstecher Axel, Nimsky Christopher, Bauer Sebastian, Sure Ulrich, Menzler Katja, Rosenow Felix, Klein Karl Martin

机构信息

Epilepsy Center Hessen, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Giessen & Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Epilepsy Center Hessen, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Giessen & Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany; Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Seizure. 2020 Feb 1;76:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.01.016.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Epilepsy surgery is an evidence-based treatment for drug-refractory focal epilepsy. We aimed to evaluate how well preoperative outcome estimates of epilepsy surgery in clinical practice correlated with postoperative outcome and to compare prediction by the clinical team with available scores (m-SFS, ESN).

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study including patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy who underwent resective epilepsy surgery at Epilepsy Center Hessen, Marburg, between 1998-2016. Patients were categorized into four groups based on their estimated chance of postoperative seizure freedom documented in preoperative medical records. Variables required for calculation of m-SFS and ESN were also extracted from presurgical medical records. Seizure outcome using Engel/ILAE classifications was extracted from postoperative medical records.

RESULTS

148 patients were included and 98 had follow-up at 5 years. 69 (70%) had Engel I and 50 (51%) ILAE 1 outcome. Observed 5-year outcome for very good candidates was 20/22 (91%) Engel I and 14/22 (64%) ILAE 1, for good candidates 29/40 (73%) Engel I and 21/40 (53%) ILAE 1, for candidates with slightly reduced chance 11/18 (61%) Engel I and 9/18 (50%) ILAE 1 and for candidates with considerably reduced chance 1/5 (20%) Engel I and 1/5 (20%) ILAE 1.There were no significant differences in discrimination or overall performance between predictions by the clinical team, ESN and m-SFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative outcome estimates corresponded well with observed outcome indicating adequate patient counseling.

摘要

目的

癫痫手术是药物难治性局灶性癫痫的一种循证治疗方法。我们旨在评估临床实践中癫痫手术术前疗效评估与术后疗效的相关性,并比较临床团队的预测结果与现有评分系统(m-SFS、ESN)。

方法

回顾性队列研究,纳入1998年至2016年间在马尔堡黑森癫痫中心接受切除性癫痫手术的药物难治性局灶性癫痫患者。根据术前病历记录的术后无癫痫发作估计概率,将患者分为四组。计算m-SFS和ESN所需的变量也从术前病历中提取。术后病历中提取采用恩格尔/国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)分类的癫痫发作结果。

结果

共纳入148例患者,98例有5年随访。69例(70%)达到恩格尔I级,50例(51%)达到ILAE 1级结果。预计预后极佳的患者5年观察结果为,20/22例(91%)达到恩格尔I级,14/22例(64%)达到ILAE 1级;预后良好的患者,29/40例(73%)达到恩格尔I级,21/40例(53%)达到ILAE 1级;预后概率略有降低的患者,11/18例(61%)达到恩格尔I级,9/18例(50%)达到ILAE 1级;预后概率大幅降低的患者,1/5例(20%)达到恩格尔I级,1/5例(20%)达到ILAE 1级。临床团队、ESN和m-SFS的预测在区分度或总体表现上无显著差异。

结论

术前疗效评估与观察到的疗效吻合良好,表明对患者的咨询充分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验