University of California, Berkeley, McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
University of Massachusetts Amherst, 130 Natural Resources Road, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;137:105410. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105410. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Municipalities in the United States often encourage bicycling for the health, economic, and environmental benefits by implementing new and innovative bicycle infrastructure treatments. Unfortunately, many treatments are unfamiliar to or misunderstood by drivers, especially when lacking explicit rules (e.g., shared lanes). To date, research has largely investigated bicycle infrastructure from a bicyclist's perspective, but with little research from the driver's perspective. The objective of this research is to utilize a driving simulator to investigate driver behavior towards different bicycle infrastructure treatments when driver behavior is not provoked by an interaction with bicyclists. More specifically, this research intends to investigate the impact of bicycling frequency and treatment familiarity, as well as the combined effect of the two, on driver behavior at each treatment type. The treatments investigated are shared lane markings called "sharrows", standard bike lanes, bike boxes, and merge lanes. The results show that bicycling frequency significantly affects the proportion of drivers making eye glances at treatments. In addition, drivers more familiar with bike boxes stopped significantly further back from bike boxes, and drivers more familiar with merge lanes performed the merge maneuver significantly earlier. Furthermore, driver speed and lane positioning at bike lanes was significantly affected by the combination of bike lane familiarity and bicycling frequency, but not individually. This research is a first step towards understanding driver behavior and expectation of bicyclists; an essential understanding for infrastructure treatments that do not provide physical barriers between bicycles and automobiles, and instead rely on driver behavior for safety.
美国的许多城市常通过引入新的创新性自行车基础设施来鼓励骑行,以实现健康、经济和环境效益。然而,许多处理方式对于司机来说并不熟悉或存在误解,尤其是在缺乏明确规则(如共享车道)的情况下。迄今为止,研究主要从自行车骑行者的角度调查自行车基础设施,但从司机的角度研究很少。本研究旨在利用驾驶模拟器来调查司机在没有与自行车骑行者交互的情况下,对不同自行车基础设施处理方式的行为。更具体地说,本研究旨在调查自行车骑行频率和处理方式熟悉程度的影响,以及这两个因素的综合影响,对每种处理方式下的司机行为的影响。研究的处理方式包括共享车道标记(称为“自行车箭头”)、标准自行车道、自行车停车区和合并车道。研究结果表明,自行车骑行频率显著影响司机注视处理方式的比例。此外,对自行车停车区更熟悉的司机从自行车停车区停车的距离显著更远,对合并车道更熟悉的司机更早地进行合并操作。此外,自行车道上的司机速度和车道位置受到自行车道熟悉程度和自行车骑行频率的组合的显著影响,但这两个因素单独影响不显著。本研究是理解司机行为和自行车骑行者预期的第一步;对于那些没有在自行车和汽车之间提供物理屏障的基础设施处理方式来说,这是一个重要的理解,需要依赖司机的行为来保证安全。