Dieterich M, Brandt T
Neurologische Klinik, Universität München, Klinikum Grosshadern, Federal Republic of Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1988;237(4):194-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00449906.
The clinical practice of advising patients to increase their daily fluid intake after lumbar puncture in order to increase CSF production by re-hydration and thus try to prevent post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH) has not yet been shown to be effective. In 100 patients the different effects of re-hydration on the incidence of PLPH (1.51 compared with 3.01 oral fluid per day over a period of 5 days) were tested prospectively. The incidence of PLPH was independent of the amount of fluid intake in both groups (18, 36%), as was the duration of PLPH. The physiology of CSF production and resorption suggests that PLPH is not a problem of CSF dynamics but a simple mechanical problem of how to close the dural rent and thereby stop the continuous leakage. It is no longer justifiable to advise patients to drink more than usual since there is no physiological or empirical basis for this and it does not seem to have even a placebo effect.
建议患者在腰椎穿刺后增加每日液体摄入量,以期通过补液增加脑脊液生成,从而预防腰椎穿刺后头痛(PLPH),但这一临床实践尚未被证明有效。前瞻性测试了100例患者补液对PLPH发生率的不同影响(5天内每日口服液体量分别为1.51和3.01)。两组中PLPH的发生率均与液体摄入量无关(分别为18例,36%),PLPH的持续时间也是如此。脑脊液生成和吸收的生理学表明,PLPH并非脑脊液动力学问题,而是一个如何封闭硬脑膜裂口从而阻止持续渗漏的简单机械问题。建议患者比平时多饮并无正当理由,因为既无生理学依据,也无经验依据,而且似乎连安慰剂效应都没有。