• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二线放线菌素 D 在甲氨蝶呤耐药性绒毛膜癌低危性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者中的有效性和毒性。

Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

机构信息

Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center, Botucatu Medical School Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UNESP-Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Tocogynecology of Botucatu Medical School, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;157(2):372-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001
PMID:32037196
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate both the outcomes and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D (ActD) chemotherapy in methotrexate (MTX) - resistant low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) with 5-day ActD versus pulsed ActD.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with MTX-resistant low-risk postmolar GTN from 1974 to 2016. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of 5-day ActD (10-12 μg/kg per day for 5 days every 14 days) or biweekly ActD (1.25 mg/m every 2 weeks). Data on patient characteristics, disease presentation, treatment outcome, and toxicity were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight MTX-resistant patients receiving ActD as second-line chemotherapy were identified (5-day ActD, 53 patients; pulsed ActD, 15 patients). No significant differences were observed in patient/disease characteristics and sustained remission (overall rate 72%) between second-line ActD regimens. Time to hCG remission was significantly faster (median 21 vs 47 days, p = .04) and required fewer treatment cycles (median 1 vs 2, p < .001) with 5-day ActD. Thrombocytopenia was only observed with 5-day ActD (64.6 vs 0%, p < .001). The frequency (60.4 vs 16.7%, p = .009) and severity (grade 3: 37.9 vs 0%, p = .045) of oral mucositis was significantly higher with 5-day ActD. Grade 2 alopecia was significantly more frequent (70.6 vs 16.7%, p = .02) with 5-day ActD.

CONCLUSIONS

While 5-day ActD and pulsed ActD achieve comparable remission rates, due to its reduced toxicity, ease of administration, and patient convenience, pulsed ActD should be the treatment of choice for MTX-resistant postmolar low-risk GTN.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估多柔比星(ActD)二线化疗在 5 天 ActD 与脉冲式 ActD 治疗 MTX 耐药低危绒癌中的疗效和毒性。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 1974 年至 2016 年期间 MTX 耐药低危绒癌患者。二线化疗包括 5 天 ActD(10-12μg/kg/天,每 14 天 5 天)或双周 ActD(1.25mg/m2,每 2 周)。收集了患者特征、疾病表现、治疗结果和毒性的数据。

结果

共确定了 68 例接受 ActD 二线化疗的 MTX 耐药患者(5 天 ActD,53 例;脉冲式 ActD,15 例)。二线 ActD 方案之间患者/疾病特征和持续缓解率(总体缓解率为 72%)无显著差异。5 天 ActD 组 hCG 缓解时间更快(中位数 21 天 vs 47 天,p=0.04),所需治疗周期更少(中位数 1 个 vs 2 个,p<0.001)。5 天 ActD 组仅出现血小板减少(64.6% vs 0%,p<0.001)。5 天 ActD 组口腔黏膜炎的发生率(60.4% vs 16.7%,p=0.009)和严重程度(3 级:37.9% vs 0%,p=0.045)显著更高。5 天 ActD 组 2 级脱发更常见(70.6% vs 16.7%,p=0.02)。

结论

虽然 5 天 ActD 和脉冲式 ActD 缓解率相当,但由于其毒性较低、给药方便和患者便利,脉冲式 ActD 应成为 MTX 耐药绒癌的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.二线放线菌素 D 在甲氨蝶呤耐药性绒毛膜癌低危性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者中的有效性和毒性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;157(2):372-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
2
Effectiveness and toxicity of first-line methotrexate chemotherapy in low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: The New England Trophoblastic Disease Center experience.一线甲氨蝶呤化疗治疗低危绒癌的有效性和毒性:新英格兰滋养细胞疾病中心的经验。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Oct 29.
3
Response to chemotherapy in overweight/obese patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤超重/肥胖患者对化疗的反应
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):734-40. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000398.
4
Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?对于低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤,不同的甲氨蝶呤方案作为一线治疗,是否比妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)0174中使用的放线菌素方案更具成本效益?
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;144(1):125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
5
First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 9;2016(6):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub4.
6
Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D and 5-day actinomycin D as first-line chemotherapy for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.脉冲放线菌素 D 与 5 天放线菌素 D 一线化疗低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Nov;143(2):225-231. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12629. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
7
Treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia comparing biweekly eight-day Methotrexate with folinic acid versus bolus-dose Actinomycin-D, among Brazilian women.巴西女性中低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗:双周8天甲氨蝶呤联合亚叶酸与大剂量放线菌素D的比较
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;37(6):258-65. doi: 10.1590/SO100-720320150005366.
8
Increasing the human chorionic gonadotrophin cut-off to ≤1000 IU/l for starting actinomycin D in post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia developing resistance to methotrexate spares more women multi-agent chemotherapy.对于发生耐药的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者,当人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)降至≤1000IU/L 时,开始应用放线菌素 D 治疗,而非甲氨蝶呤多药化疗,可以使更多的女性避免接受多药化疗。
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100110. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100110. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
9
Can carboplatin or etoposide replace actinomycin-d for second-line treatment of methotrexate resistant low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia?卡铂或依托泊苷能否替代更生霉素用于治疗甲氨蝶呤耐药的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的二线治疗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Actinomycin D for methotrexate-failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.放线菌素D用于甲氨蝶呤治疗失败的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
J Reprod Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(7-8):283-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunotherapy in the treatment of chemoresistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia - systematic review with a presentation of the first 4 Brazilian cases.免疫疗法治疗化疗耐药性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤-系统评价及 4 例巴西首例病例报告。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jul 29;78:100260. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100260. eCollection 2023.
2
Clinical Presentation, Treatment Outcomes, and Resistance-related Factors in South American Women with Low-risk Postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.南美低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者的临床表现、治疗结果和耐药相关因素。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Aug;44(8):746-754. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748974. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Current Evidence on Immunotherapy for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN).
妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)免疫治疗的当前证据
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 3;14(11):2782. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112782.