• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估惩教社区缓刑人群的风险:使用移动神经认知评估软件预测再次犯罪

Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software.

作者信息

Haarsma Gabe, Davenport Sasha, White Devonte C, Ormachea Pablo A, Sheena Erin, Eagleman David M

机构信息

The Center for Science and Law, Houston, TX, United States.

Administration of Justice Department, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 24;10:2926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926
PMID:32038355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6992536/
Abstract

We seek to address current limitations of forensic risk assessments by introducing the first mobile, self-scoring, risk assessment software that relies on neurocognitive testing to predict reoffense. This assessment, run entirely on a tablet, measures decision-making via a suite of neurocognitive tests in less than 30 minutes. The software measures several cognitive and decision-making traits of the user, including impulsivity, empathy, aggression, and several other traits linked to reoffending. Our analysis measured whether this assessment successfully predicted recidivism by testing probationers in a large urban city (Houston, TX, United States) from 2017 to 2019. To determine predictive validity, we used machine learning to yield cross-validated receiver-operator characteristics. Results gave a recidivism prediction value of 0.70, making it comparable to commonly used risk assessments. This novel approach diverges from traditional self-reporting, interview-based, and criminal-records-based approaches, and can also add a protective layer against bias, while strengthening model accuracy in predicting reoffense. In addition, subjectivity is eliminated and time-consuming administrative efforts are reduced. With continued data collection, this approach opens the possibility of identifying different levels of recidivism risk, by crime type, for any age, or gender, and seeks to steer individuals appropriately toward rehabilitative programs. Suggestions for future research directions are provided.

摘要

我们试图通过引入首款基于神经认知测试来预测再犯的移动、自动评分风险评估软件,来解决当前法医风险评估的局限性。这项评估完全在平板电脑上运行,通过一套神经认知测试在不到30分钟内测量决策能力。该软件测量用户的几种认知和决策特征,包括冲动性、同理心、攻击性以及其他与再犯相关的特征。我们的分析通过在2017年至2019年期间对美国得克萨斯州休斯顿市的缓刑犯进行测试,来衡量这项评估是否成功预测了累犯情况。为了确定预测效度,我们使用机器学习得出交叉验证的接收者操作特征曲线。结果得出的累犯预测值为0.70,使其与常用的风险评估相当。这种新颖的方法不同于传统的自我报告、基于访谈和基于犯罪记录的方法,还可以增加一层防止偏见的保护,同时提高预测再犯的模型准确性。此外,消除了主观性,减少了耗时的行政工作。随着持续的数据收集,这种方法有可能按犯罪类型、年龄或性别识别不同程度的累犯风险,并试图引导个人适当地参与康复项目。文中还提供了未来研究方向的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/16102bf22da7/fpsyg-10-02926-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/50c86b160b1c/fpsyg-10-02926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/74b4daa26ae2/fpsyg-10-02926-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/0c3d5f15a1d1/fpsyg-10-02926-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/16102bf22da7/fpsyg-10-02926-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/50c86b160b1c/fpsyg-10-02926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/74b4daa26ae2/fpsyg-10-02926-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/0c3d5f15a1d1/fpsyg-10-02926-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e333/6992536/16102bf22da7/fpsyg-10-02926-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software.评估惩教社区缓刑人群的风险:使用移动神经认知评估软件预测再次犯罪
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 24;10:2926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926. eCollection 2019.
2
Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in U.S. correctional settings.美国惩教机构中累犯风险评估工具的表现。
Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):206-222. doi: 10.1037/ser0000075. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
3
The Relationship Between Gambling Severity and Risk of Criminal Recidivism.赌博严重程度与再次犯罪风险之间的关系
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Jul;63(4):1201-1206. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13662. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
4
Effectiveness of aggression replacement training in reducing criminal recidivism among convicted adult offenders.攻击性替代训练在减少成年罪犯再犯罪方面的有效性。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2018 Dec;28(6):476-491. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2092. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Predicting reoffense for community-based sexual offenders: an analysis of 30 years of data.预测社区性犯罪者再犯罪:30 年数据分析。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Oct;24(5):501-14. doi: 10.1177/1079063212446514. Epub 2012 May 29.
6
Tablet computers and forensic and correctional psychological assessment: A randomized controlled study.平板电脑与法医和矫正心理评估:一项随机对照研究。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;41(5):468-477. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000245. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
7
Swift, certain and fair justice: Insights from behavioural learning and neurocognitive research.迅速、公正、公平的司法:行为学习和神经认知研究的启示。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S240-S245. doi: 10.1111/dar.12628.
8
Testing the Predictive Validity of the LSI-R Using a Sample of Young Male Offenders on Probation in Guangzhou, China.在中国广州,以一批处于缓刑期的年轻男性罪犯为样本,测试LSI-R的预测效度。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Mar;60(4):456-68. doi: 10.1177/0306624X14557471. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Comparing Public Safety Outcomes for Traditional Probation vs Specialty Mental Health Probation.传统缓刑与专业心理健康缓刑的公共安全结果比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 1;74(9):942-948. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1384.
10
Enabling Individualized Criminal Sentencing While Reducing Subjectivity: A Tablet-Based Assessment of Recidivism Risk.
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 1;18(3):243-51. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.stas1-1603.

引用本文的文献

1
A fairness scale for real-time recidivism forecasts using a national database of convicted offenders.一种利用全国罪犯数据库进行实时累犯预测的公平性量表。
Neural Comput Appl. 2025;37(26):21607-21657. doi: 10.1007/s00521-025-11478-x. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
Editorial: Law and neuroscience: justice as a challenge for neurorights, neurolaw, and forensic psychology.社论:法律与神经科学:正义对神经权利、神经法学和法医心理学的挑战。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 19;16:1615234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615234. eCollection 2025.
3
Neuropsychological assessment of aggressive offenders: a Delphi consensus study.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing predictive performance of criminal recidivism models using registration data with binary and survival outcomes.利用二项和生存结局的登记数据优化犯罪再犯预测模型的预测性能。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 8;14(3):e0213245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213245. eCollection 2019.
2
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism.预测累犯的准确性、公正性和局限性。
Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 17;4(1):eaao5580. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580. eCollection 2018 Jan.
3
Risk assessment tools in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry: The need for better data.
攻击性罪犯的神经心理学评估:一项德尔菲共识研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 23;15:1328839. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1328839. eCollection 2024.
4
Clarifying the relationship between mental illness and recidivism using machine learning: A retrospective study.使用机器学习厘清精神疾病与累犯的关系:回溯性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0297448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297448. eCollection 2024.
5
Machine Learning and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review of Advanced Methodology for Recidivism Risk Prediction.机器学习与刑事司法:累犯风险预测先进方法的系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;19(17):10594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710594.
刑事司法与法医精神病学中的风险评估工具:对更好数据的需求。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:134-137. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Gender, risk assessment, and sanctioning: The cost of treating women like men.性别、风险评估与制裁:将女性视为男性对待的代价。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Oct;40(5):580-93. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000206. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
5
Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in U.S. correctional settings.美国惩教机构中累犯风险评估工具的表现。
Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):206-222. doi: 10.1037/ser0000075. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
6
Enabling Individualized Criminal Sentencing While Reducing Subjectivity: A Tablet-Based Assessment of Recidivism Risk.
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 1;18(3):243-51. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.stas1-1603.
7
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): validation of executive function measures in adults.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池(CB):成人执行功能测量的验证
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):620-9. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000472. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
8
Empathic competencies in violent offenders.暴力罪犯的共情能力。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 30;210(3):1168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.027. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
9
Measurement of predictive validity in violence risk assessment studies: a second-order systematic review.暴力风险评估研究中预测有效性的测量:二阶系统评价。
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Jan-Feb;31(1):55-73. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2053.
10
Emotional empathy and psychopathy in offenders: an experimental study.罪犯的情绪共情与精神病态:一项实验研究。
J Pers Disord. 2013 Feb;27(1):67-84. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.1.67.