• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我会直言不讳以不负你的信任:心理安全与调节焦点的作用。

I Would Speak Up to Live Up to Your Trust: The Role of Psychological Safety and Regulatory Focus.

作者信息

Song Yu, Peng Peng, Yu Guangtao

机构信息

Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 23;10:2966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02966. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02966
PMID:32038371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6989476/
Abstract

Voicing upward refers to employee efforts to improve organizational functioning by making suggestions or expressing opinions and concerns. While extant studies have investigated how supervisors' behaviors or attitudes influence employee voice behaviors, researchers have paid little attention to the effects of employee perceptions on voice. Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), we developed and tested the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors on two dimensions of voice (promotive and prohibitive), focusing on the mediation role of psychological safety and the interaction effect of psychological safety and regulatory focus on voice. Using a sample of 244 participants and three waves of longitudinal data, we investigated whether feeling trusted would lead to both promotive and prohibitive voice through psychological safety. We also extensively examined the moderation effect of regulatory focus on psychological safety and the contingency dimension of voice. We found that promotion focus strengthens the positive relationship between psychological safety and voice (both promotive and prohibitive voice), whereas prevention focus strengthens the positive relationship between psychological safety and prohibitive voice. This paper concludes with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

摘要

向上建言是指员工通过提出建议或表达意见及关切来努力改善组织功能。虽然现有研究探讨了上级的行为或态度如何影响员工的建言行为,但研究人员很少关注员工认知对建言的影响。基于计划行为理论(TPB),我们研究并测试了被上级信任的感受对建言的两个维度(促进性和禁止性)的影响,重点关注心理安全感的中介作用以及心理安全感与调节焦点对建言的交互作用。我们以244名参与者为样本,采用三波纵向数据,研究了被信任的感受是否会通过心理安全感导致促进性和禁止性建言。我们还广泛考察了调节焦点对心理安全感的调节作用以及建言的权变维度。我们发现,促进焦点加强了心理安全感与建言(促进性和禁止性建言)之间的正向关系,而预防焦点加强了心理安全感与禁止性建言之间的正向关系。本文最后讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/568c/6989476/5c333711c7c3/fpsyg-10-02966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/568c/6989476/6418aebeeb20/fpsyg-10-02966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/568c/6989476/fde3baf96c4e/fpsyg-10-02966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/568c/6989476/5c333711c7c3/fpsyg-10-02966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/568c/6989476/6418aebeeb20/fpsyg-10-02966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/568c/6989476/fde3baf96c4e/fpsyg-10-02966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/568c/6989476/5c333711c7c3/fpsyg-10-02966-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
I Would Speak Up to Live Up to Your Trust: The Role of Psychological Safety and Regulatory Focus.我会直言不讳以不负你的信任:心理安全与调节焦点的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 23;10:2966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02966. eCollection 2019.
2
The High-Performance Work System, Employee Voice, and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety.高绩效工作系统、员工话语权和创新行为:心理安全的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041150.
3
The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.悖论式领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:537756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756. eCollection 2020.
4
A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework.建议每天保持改善,远离枯竭:在监管焦点和自我损耗框架内检查促进和禁止声音行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1381-97. doi: 10.1037/apl0000018. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
5
How Does Group Climate Foster or Hinder Employee Voice? A Cross-Level Examination.团队氛围如何促进或阻碍员工发声?一项跨层次研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:609953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609953. eCollection 2021.
6
The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains.信息内容很重要:促进性和禁止性团队发声对团队生产力和安全绩效增益的差异影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Aug;102(8):1259-1270. doi: 10.1037/apl0000215. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Different Workplace Currencies and Employee Voice: From the Multidimensional Approach of Leader-Member Exchange.不同的职场货币与员工声音:基于领导-成员交换的多维视角
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 28;11:589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00589. eCollection 2020.
8
How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees' Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective.从领导-成员交换视角看矛盾型领导如何影响员工的工作场所中的建言行为
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041162.
9
When Do Employees Speak Up Under Job Stressors? Exploring the Potential U-Shaped Relationship Between Hindrance Stressors and Voice Behavior.员工在工作压力源下何时会发声?探究阻碍性压力源与建言行为之间潜在的U型关系。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 22;10:2336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02336. eCollection 2019.
10
Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale.荷兰版促进性和禁止性声音量表的心理测量学验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 25;12:722238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722238. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Pipe up or clam up: the double-edged sword effect of perceived overqualification on employee voice behavior.要么畅所欲言,要么保持沉默:感知到的资历过高对员工建言行为的双刃剑效应。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1632774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1632774. eCollection 2025.
2
Neuroception of psychological safety scale (NPSS): validation with a UK based adult community sample.心理安全感神经感知量表(NPSS):基于英国成年社区样本的验证
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2490329. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2490329. Epub 2025 May 6.
3
Nurses' feeling trusted and knowledge hiding: The role of psychological safety, felt obligation and traditionality.

本文引用的文献

1
Confronting Co-workers: Role Models, Attitudes, Expectations, and Perceived Behavioral Control as Predictors of Employee Voice in the Military.面对同事:榜样、态度、期望以及感知行为控制作为军队中员工建言的预测因素
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02515. eCollection 2018.
2
A self-regulation perspective on how and when regulatory focus differentially relates to citizenship behaviors.从自我调节的角度看,在何种情况下,监管重点会对公民行为产生不同的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 May;104(5):629-641. doi: 10.1037/apl0000366. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
Humble Leadership, Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Follower Creativity: A Cross-Level Investigation.
护士的被信任感受与知识隐瞒:心理安全感、责任感和传统观念的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 18;13:1034882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1034882. eCollection 2022.
4
High-level talents' perceive overqualification and withdrawal behavior: A power perspective based on survival needs.高层次人才的感知过度资格与离职行为:基于生存需求的权力视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:921627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921627. eCollection 2022.
5
How Safety Climate Impacts Safety Voice-Investigating the Mediating Role of Psychological Safety from a Social Cognitive Perspective.安全氛围如何影响安全建言:从社会认知视角看心理安全感的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11867. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911867.
6
How Does Group Climate Foster or Hinder Employee Voice? A Cross-Level Examination.团队氛围如何促进或阻碍员工发声?一项跨层次研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:609953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609953. eCollection 2021.
7
Cultivating Proactive Career Behavior: The Role of Career Adaptability and Job Embeddedness.培养积极主动的职业行为:职业适应性和工作嵌入性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 7;12:603890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603890. eCollection 2021.
8
Healthcare Professionals Experience of Psychological Safety, Voice, and Silence.医疗保健专业人员对心理安全、表达意见和沉默的体验。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 19;12:626689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626689. eCollection 2021.
9
Promoting Innovative Behavior in Employees: The Mechanism of Leader Psychological Capital.促进员工的创新行为:领导心理资本的作用机制
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:598090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598090. eCollection 2020.
谦逊领导、心理安全、知识共享与下属创造力:一项跨层次研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 19;9:1727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01727. eCollection 2018.
4
A Role Theory Perspective on How and When Goal-Focused Leadership Influences Employee Voice Behavior.目标导向型领导如何及何时影响员工建言行为的角色理论视角
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 25;9:1244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01244. eCollection 2018.
5
Nonlinear consequences of promotive and prohibitive voice for managers' responses: The roles of voice frequency and LMX.促进性和抑制性声音对管理者反应的非线性影响:声音频率和 LMX 的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Oct;103(10):1101-1120. doi: 10.1037/apl0000326. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
Trust in direct leaders and top leaders: A trickle-up model.直接领导和高层领导的信任:一种涓滴模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Apr;102(4):648-657. doi: 10.1037/apl0000189. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice.如果我的声音符合社会期望,我会说出来:促进性与禁止性声音的中介调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1641-52. doi: 10.1037/a0039046. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
8
A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework.建议每天保持改善,远离枯竭:在监管焦点和自我损耗框架内检查促进和禁止声音行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1381-97. doi: 10.1037/apl0000018. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
9
A taxonomy of endogenous and exogenous uncertainty in high-risk, high-impact contexts.高风险、高影响情境中的内源性和外源性不确定性分类。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1309-1318. doi: 10.1037/a0038591. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
10
Regulatory focus in the life story: prevention and promotion as expressed in three layers of personality.生活故事中的调节焦点:预防和促进在三层人格中的表达。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):169-81. doi: 10.1037/a0034951.