• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

悖论式领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。

The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.

作者信息

Li Xiyuan, Xue Ying, Liang Hao, Yan Dong

机构信息

Economics and Management School of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:537756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756
PMID:33071857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7541695/
Abstract

Paradoxical leadership is associated with positive behavioral outcomes. However, the link between paradoxical leadership and voice behavior is not comprehensively studied in extant literature. This paper builds a theoretical model to reveal how paradoxical leadership facilitates promotive and prohibitive voice behavior of employees, drawing upon social cognitive theory and regulatory focus theory. We proposed a moderated mediation model that employees' voice behavior is related to paradoxical leadership through self-efficacy and psychological safety. With data from 268 leader - employee pairs of questionnaires, this study conducted a structural equation model to test the conceptual framework. The results show that (a) leader's paradoxical leadership related to employee's promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors positively; (b) employee's self-efficacy and psychological safety mediate the extent of effect the superior's paradoxical leadership has on subordinate's voice behavior; (c) the more obvious the subordinate's promotion focus orientation, the stronger the mediating effect of self-efficacy; and (d) the more obvious the subordinate's prevention focus orientation, the weaker the mediating effect of psychological safety. These conclusions reveal the influencing mechanism of a superior's paradoxical leadership on a subordinate's voice behavior. It expands paradoxical leadership-related studies, enriches studies related to the field of "leader - employee voice behavior," and highlights the relationship between the duality of paradoxical leadership behavior on employees with different regulatory focus orientation with a new perspective.

摘要

矛盾式领导与积极的行为结果相关。然而,现有文献中对矛盾式领导与建言行为之间的联系尚未进行全面研究。本文借鉴社会认知理论和调节焦点理论,构建了一个理论模型,以揭示矛盾式领导如何促进员工的促进性建言行为和禁止性建言行为。我们提出了一个有调节的中介模型,即员工的建言行为通过自我效能感和心理安全感与矛盾式领导相关。本研究利用来自268对领导-员工问卷的数据,进行了结构方程模型检验该概念框架。结果表明:(a)领导的矛盾式领导与员工的促进性建言行为和禁止性建言行为呈正相关;(b)员工的自我效能感和心理安全感中介了上级的矛盾式领导对下属建言行为的影响程度;(c)下属的促进焦点导向越明显,自我效能感的中介作用越强;(d)下属的预防焦点导向越明显,心理安全感的中介作用越弱。这些结论揭示了上级的矛盾式领导对下属建言行为的影响机制。它拓展了矛盾式领导相关研究,丰富了“领导-员工建言行为”领域的研究,并以新的视角突出了矛盾式领导行为的二元性与不同调节焦点导向员工之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/7541695/475a6a80e479/fpsyg-11-537756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/7541695/c84b7e48c4b8/fpsyg-11-537756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/7541695/475a6a80e479/fpsyg-11-537756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/7541695/c84b7e48c4b8/fpsyg-11-537756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/7541695/475a6a80e479/fpsyg-11-537756-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.悖论式领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:537756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756. eCollection 2020.
2
How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees' Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective.从领导-成员交换视角看矛盾型领导如何影响员工的工作场所中的建言行为
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041162.
3
Acting on Leader's Emotions: How and When Emotion Recognition Ability Motivates Voice?对领导者情绪的反应:情绪识别能力如何以及何时激发建言?
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Jan 13;15:123-135. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S338036. eCollection 2022.
4
When and why voice to higher-up? Declaring the psychological mechanisms of subordinate's voice behavior in the public sector.何时以及为何向上级发声?揭示公共部门下属发声行为的心理机制。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 18;18(8):e0285104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285104. eCollection 2023.
5
How Can Servant Leadership Promote Employees' Voice Behavior? A Moderated Chain Mediation Model.仆人式领导如何促进员工的建言行为?一个有调节的链式中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 4;13:938983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938983. eCollection 2022.
6
How Employee's Leadership Potential Leads to Leadership Ostracism Behavior: The Mediating Role of Envy, and the Moderating Role of Political Skills.员工的领导潜力如何导致领导排斥行为:嫉妒的中介作用,以及政治技能的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093080.
7
Organizational adaptation to working from home in a crisis situation (COVID-19): the interaction between leaders' openness and followers' voice.危机情况下(新冠疫情)组织对居家办公的适应:领导者开放性与追随者建言之间的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1181807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181807. eCollection 2023.
8
Feeling Trusted or Feeling Used? The Relationship Between Perceived Leader Trust, Reciprocation Wariness, and Proactive Behavior.感到被信任还是被利用?领导者信任感知、回报警惕与主动行为之间的关系。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Sep 22;14:1461-1472. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S328458. eCollection 2021.
9
Employee Voice: A Mechanism to Harness Employees' Potential for Sustainable Success.员工声音:挖掘员工潜力实现可持续成功的机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020921.
10
Voice Endorsement and Employee Safety Voice Behavior in Construction Projects: The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange.建筑项目中的语音认可与员工安全语音行为:领导成员交换的中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 13;19(6):3374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063374.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of paradoxical leadership on nurse's job performance: the mediating role of thriving at work.矛盾型领导对护士工作绩效的影响:工作中蓬勃发展的中介作用。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 1;24(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03800-8.
2
Occupational Health and Performance Among Chinese University Teachers: A COR Theory Model of Health-Promoting Leadership and Burnout.中国大学教师的职业健康与工作绩效:健康促进型领导与职业倦怠的COR理论模型
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Jul 14;15(7):134. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15070134.
3
Analysis of the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Nurses' Voice Behavior in Neonatal Intensive Care Units of Grade A Tertiary Hospitals in Sichuan Province: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Servant leadership and employee voice behavior: a cross-level investigation in China.仆人式领导与员工建言行为:中国的跨层次研究
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 17;5(1):1595. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3264-4. eCollection 2016.
2
ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE VOICE: EMPLOYEE SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-IMPACT AS MEDIATORS.道德领导力与员工建言:以员工自我效能感和自我影响力为中介变量
Psychol Rep. 2015 Jun;116(3):751-67. doi: 10.2466/01.07.PR0.116k29w9. Epub 2015 May 18.
3
How abusive supervisors influence employees' voice and silence: the effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution.
四川省三级甲等医院新生儿重症监护病房护士发声行为的现状及影响因素分析:一项多中心横断面研究
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Mar 24;2025:8175652. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8175652. eCollection 2025.
4
Gen Z Tourism Employees' Adaptive Performance During a Major Cultural Shift: The Impact of Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior.Z世代旅游员工在重大文化转变期间的适应性绩效:领导与员工建言行为的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;15(2):171. doi: 10.3390/bs15020171.
5
Paradoxical leadership and well-being in turbulent times: a time-lagged study.动荡时期的矛盾型领导与幸福感:一项滞后性研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 24;14:1148822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148822. eCollection 2023.
6
How Does Secure-Base Leadership Affect Employees' Taking-Charge Behavior: The Role of Psychological Availability and Independent Self-Construal.安全型领导如何影响员工的主动行为:心理可及性和独立自我建构的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;13(10):853. doi: 10.3390/bs13100853.
7
Leader Boundary-Spanning Behavior and Employee Voice Behavior: The Job Demands-Resources Perspective.领导者的跨边界行为与员工的建言行为:工作要求-资源视角
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;13(2):146. doi: 10.3390/bs13020146.
8
A Study on Paradoxical Leadership and Multiple Path Mechanisms of Employees' Bootleg Innovation.员工自发创新的悖论式领导与多重路径机制研究
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Nov 22;15:3391-3407. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S383155. eCollection 2022.
9
In a team forgiveness climate, the influence of paradoxical thinking of leaders on the team voice behavior: Mediated by team cooperation.在团队宽恕氛围中,领导者的悖论思维对团队建言行为的影响:以团队合作作为中介变量
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 15;17(3):e0265018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265018. eCollection 2022.
10
Impact of Organizational Dehumanization on Employee Knowledge Hiding.组织去人性化对员工知识隐藏的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:803905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.803905. eCollection 2022.
虐待型上司如何影响员工的建言与沉默:互动公平性和组织归因的作用
J Soc Psychol. 2015 May-Jun;155(3):204-20. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.990410. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
The relational antecedents of voice targeted at different leaders.针对不同领导者的声音的关系先行因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Sep;98(5):841-51. doi: 10.1037/a0032913. Epub 2013 May 6.
5
Authentic leadership and nurses' voice behaviour and perceptions of care quality.真实型领导与护士进谏行为和护理质量感知。
J Nurs Manag. 2010 Nov;18(8):889-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01113.x.
6
Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation.仆人式领导、程序公正氛围、服务氛围、员工态度和组织公民行为:跨层次调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):517-29. doi: 10.1037/a0018867.
7
Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety.领导者人格特质与员工建言行为:道德领导与工作群体心理安全的中介作用
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1275-86. doi: 10.1037/a0015848.
8
Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice.离职前的退出:心理依恋与超脱对建言的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jul;93(4):912-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.912.
9
Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work.对工作中积极主动行为的前因进行建模。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 May;91(3):636-52. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636.
10
Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability.作为情境绩效不同形式的发声与合作行为:与大五人格特质及认知能力的差异关系证据
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Apr;86(2):326-36. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326.