Jayasingam Sharmilla Devi, Citartan Marimuthu, Thang Thean Hock, Mat Zin Anani Aila, Ang Kai Cheen, Ch'ng Ewe Seng
Oncological and Radiological Sciences Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute (AMDI), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, Malaysia.
Infectious Disease Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute (AMDI), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, Malaysia.
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 24;9:1512. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01512. eCollection 2019.
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) as immune cells within the tumor microenvironment have gained much interests as basic science regarding their roles in tumor progression unfolds. Better understanding of their polarization into pro-tumoral phenotype to promote tumor growth, tumor angiogenesis, immune evasion, and tumor metastasis has prompted various studies to investigate their clinical significance as a biomarker of predictive and prognostic value across different cancer types. Yet, the methodologies to investigate the polarization phenomena in solid tumor tissue vary. Nonetheless, quantifying the ratio of M1 to M2 TAMs has emerged to be a prevailing parameter to evaluate this polarization phenomena for clinical application. This mini-review focuses on recent studies exploring clinical significance of M1/M2 TAM ratio in human cancer tissue and critically evaluates the technicalities and challenges in quantifying this parameter for routine clinical practice. Immunohistochemistry appears to be the preferred methodology for M1/M2 TAM evaluation as it is readily available in clinical laboratories, albeit with certain limitations. Recommendations are made to standardize the quantification of TAMs for better transition into clinical practice and for better comparison among studies in various populations of patients and cancer types.
肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAMs)作为肿瘤微环境中的免疫细胞,随着其在肿瘤进展中作用的基础科学研究不断展开,已引起广泛关注。对其向促肿瘤表型极化以促进肿瘤生长、肿瘤血管生成、免疫逃逸和肿瘤转移的深入理解,促使众多研究去探究其作为不同癌症类型预测和预后价值生物标志物的临床意义。然而,研究实体瘤组织中极化现象的方法各不相同。尽管如此,量化M1与M2 TAMs的比例已成为评估这种极化现象以供临床应用的一个普遍参数。本综述聚焦于近期探索人癌组织中M1/M2 TAM比例临床意义的研究,并批判性地评估了在常规临床实践中量化该参数的技术和挑战。免疫组织化学似乎是评估M1/M2 TAM的首选方法,因为它在临床实验室中很容易获得,尽管存在一定局限性。本文提出了一些建议,以规范TAMs的量化,以便更好地过渡到临床实践,并在不同患者群体和癌症类型的研究之间进行更好的比较。