男同性恋者在肛门生殖器性交过程中避孕套的失败率。
Failure rate of condoms during anogenital intercourse in homosexual men.
作者信息
van Griensven G J, de Vroome E M, Tielman R A, Coutinho R A
机构信息
Department of Public Health and Environment, Municipal Health Service, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Genitourin Med. 1988 Oct;64(5):344-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.64.5.344.
Two hundred and seventy seven homosexual men participating in an AIDS study in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, were interviewed in July to December 1986 regarding their experiences with the use of condoms during anogenital intercourse. It appeared that in many cases the condoms used could not be described as reliable, or were not used safely. In 8% (117/1468) of cases the condom tore or slipped off. When different condoms were compared, it was seen that "qualified" anal condoms functioned best. Other anal condoms functioned worse, and in many cases even worse than classic vaginal condoms. Whether these differences exclusively depended on differences in quality cannot be assessed. Men who buy a qualified anal condom are possibly more motivated and thus also less likely to have failures. Regarding the apparent unreliability of the condoms used, homosexual men are advised to refrain from anogenital intercourse. When this is not feasible, a qualified anal condom should be used.
1986年7月至12月期间，对参与荷兰阿姆斯特丹一项艾滋病研究的277名男同性恋者进行了访谈，了解他们在肛门生殖器性交时使用避孕套的经历。结果发现，在许多情况下，所使用的避孕套不能被描述为可靠，或者使用不安全。在8%（117/1468）的案例中，避孕套破裂或滑落。当对不同的避孕套进行比较时，发现“合格的”肛门避孕套效果最佳。其他肛门避孕套效果较差，在许多情况下甚至比传统的阴道避孕套还要差。这些差异是否完全取决于质量差异尚无法评估。购买合格肛门避孕套的男性可能更有积极性，因此出现失误的可能性也较小。鉴于所使用的避孕套明显不可靠，建议男同性恋者避免进行肛门生殖器性交。如果这不可行，则应使用合格的肛门避孕套。
Zotero 插件