Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(4):931-938. doi: 10.1177/0363546519900897. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
Most patients return successfully to shoulder involving sports or activity after rotator cuff repairs. It has not been decided yet whether postoperative participation in shoulder activity adds to the risk of retear.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to verify whether patients who participate in shoulder activities after rotator cuff repair have a higher risk of structural failure than nonactive patients and to investigate the relationship between postoperative shoulder function and tendon integrity in active and nonactive patients. The hypotheses were that (1) active patients have a higher retear rate than nonactive patients and (2) structural failure is associated with worse functional outcomes in active patients.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A cohort study was performed using 145 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2015 to 2017. Functional assessments and magnetic resonance imaging were performed at least 24 months postoperatively. Shoulder activities since 6 months after surgery were rated in 4 categories (sports, job, activities of daily life, and weight of general lifting) as sedentary, light, moderate, or strenuous. The activity level of each patient was defined by the highest rated category. Patients who were involved in light, moderate, and strenuous activity were identified as active for the present study, and the rest were defined as sedentary. The proportion of retears between groups and the functional conditions between retorn and intact tendons were compared.
A total of 48 patients were enrolled in the active group, and 97 were enrolled in the sedentary group. The active group demonstrated a significantly higher retear rate than the sedentary group (27.1% vs 11.3%, respectively; = .016; risk ratio, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.16-4.93]). In the active group, patients with retears showed higher visual analog scale scores for pain, decreased abduction strength, and lower shoulder functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Fudan University Shoulder Score, and Constant-Murley score) than those with healed tendons, whereas in the sedentary group, functional outcomes were generally similar across patients with and without retears.
Shoulder activity after the early postoperative period was associated with a high risk of retears in patients who underwent rotator cuff repair. A correlation between inhibited function and structural failure was detected but only in active patients, while sedentary patients with retears retained functional improvements similar to those with intact tendons.
大多数接受肩袖修复的患者在术后能够成功恢复参与肩部活动或运动。目前尚未确定术后参与肩部活动是否会增加再撕裂的风险。
目的/假设:本研究旨在验证肩袖修复后参与肩部活动的患者与非活动患者相比,结构性失败的风险是否更高,并研究活动和非活动患者术后肩部功能与肌腱完整性之间的关系。假设为:(1)活动患者的再撕裂率高于非活动患者;(2)结构性失败与活动患者的功能结果较差相关。
队列研究;证据等级,3 级。
对 2015 年至 2017 年期间接受关节镜肩袖修复的 145 例患者进行了队列研究。术后至少 24 个月进行功能评估和磁共振成像检查。将术后 6 个月以来的肩部活动分为 4 个类别(运动、工作、日常生活活动和一般举重重量):久坐、轻、中、重。每位患者的活动水平由最高评级类别定义。本研究将参与轻、中、重度活动的患者定义为活动组,其余患者定义为久坐组。比较两组的再撕裂比例以及撕裂和完整肌腱的功能状况。
共有 48 例患者被纳入活动组,97 例患者被纳入久坐组。活动组的再撕裂率明显高于久坐组(分别为 27.1%和 11.3%; =.016;风险比,2.39 [95%CI,1.16-4.93])。在活动组中,有再撕裂的患者疼痛视觉模拟评分较高,外展力量下降,肩功能评分(美国肩肘外科协会评分、复旦大学肩关节评分和 Constant-Murley 评分)较低,而在久坐组中,有再撕裂的患者与无再撕裂的患者的功能结果总体相似。
肩袖修复后早期进行肩部活动与患者再撕裂的高风险相关。在活动患者中发现了功能受限与结构失败之间的相关性,但仅在活动患者中发现,而有再撕裂的久坐患者的功能改善与完整肌腱的患者相似。