Centro Universitario di Odontoiatria Via Gramsci 14. 43126, Parma, Italy
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Mar 1;25(2):e299-e310. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23355.
Saliva evaluation could be a possible alternative to blood and/or tissue analyses, for researching specific molecules associated to the presence of systemic diseases and malignancies. The present systematic review has been designed in order to answer to the question "are there significant associations between specific salivary biomarkers and diagnosis of systemic diseases or malignancies?".
The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was used to guide the review. The combinations of "saliva" and "systemic diseases" or "diagnosis" or "biomarkers" or "cancers" or "carcinoma" or "tumors", were used to search Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Endpoint of research has been set at May 2019. Studies were classified into 3 groups according to the type of disease investigated for diagnosis: 1) malignant tumors; 2) neurologic diseases and 3) inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases. Assessment of quality has been assigned according to a series of questions proposed by the National Institute of Health. Level of evidence was assessed using the categories proposed in the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based medicine (CEMB) levels for diagnosis (2011).
Seventy-nine studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-one (64%) investigated malignant tumors, 14 (17.5%) neurologic and 14 (18.5%) inflammatory/cardiovascular/metabolic diseases. Among studies investigating malignant tumors, 12 (23.5%) were scored as "good" and 11 of these reported statistically significant associations between salivary molecules and pathology. Two and 5 studies were found to have a good quality, among those evaluating the association between salivary biomarkers and neurologic and inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases, respectively.
The present systematic review confirms the existence of some "good" quality evidence to support the role of peculiar salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases (e.g. lung cancer and EGFR).
唾液评估可能是一种替代血液和/或组织分析的方法,可用于研究与系统性疾病和恶性肿瘤存在相关的特定分子。本系统评价旨在回答“特定唾液生物标志物与系统性疾病或恶性肿瘤的诊断之间是否存在显著关联?”这一问题。
本研究采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明来指导综述。使用“唾液”和“系统性疾病”或“诊断”或“生物标志物”或“癌症”或“癌”或“肿瘤”的组合,在 Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行检索。研究的终点设定在 2019 年 5 月。根据所研究的疾病类型,将研究分为 3 组,用于诊断:1)恶性肿瘤;2)神经疾病;3)炎症/代谢/心血管疾病。根据美国国立卫生研究院提出的一系列问题对质量进行评估。使用牛津循证医学中心(CEMB)诊断类别(2011 年)评估证据水平。
79 项研究符合纳入和排除标准。51 项(64%)研究了恶性肿瘤,14 项(17.5%)研究了神经疾病,14 项(18.5%)研究了炎症/代谢/心血管疾病。在研究恶性肿瘤的研究中,有 12 项(23.5%)被评为“良好”,其中 11 项报告了唾液分子与病理学之间存在统计学显著关联。在评估唾液生物标志物与神经和炎症/代谢/心血管疾病之间关联的研究中,分别发现了 2 项和 5 项具有良好质量的研究。
本系统评价证实了一些“良好”质量证据的存在,支持了特定唾液生物标志物在系统性疾病诊断中的作用(例如肺癌和 EGFR)。