• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过维基百科看科学:通过共引网络呈现的开放知识新形式

Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks.

机构信息

Medialab UGR, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Department of Information and Communication, University of Granada, Faculty of Communication and Documentation, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 10;15(2):e0228713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228713. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0228713
PMID:32040488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7010282/
Abstract

This study provides an overview of science from the Wikipedia perspective. A methodology has been established for the analysis of how Wikipedia editors regard science through their references to scientific papers. The method of co-citation has been adapted to this context in order to generate Pathfinder networks (PFNET) that highlight the most relevant scientific journals and categories, and their interactions in order to find out how scientific literature is consumed through this open encyclopaedia. In addition to this, their obsolescence has been studied through Price index. A total of 1 433 457 references available at Altmetric.com have been initially taken into account. After pre-processing and linking them to the data from Elsevier's CiteScore Metrics the sample was reduced to 847 512 references made by 193 802 Wikipedia articles to 598 746 scientific articles belonging to 14 149 journals indexed in Scopus. As highlighted results we found a significative presence of "Medicine" and "Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology" papers and that the most important journals are multidisciplinary in nature, suggesting also that high-impact factor journals were more likely to be cited. Furthermore, only 13.44% of Wikipedia citations are to Open Access journals.

摘要

本研究从维基百科的角度概述了科学。通过分析维基百科编辑如何通过引用科学论文来对待科学,已经建立了一种方法。共被引方法已适应于此背景,以生成突出最相关科学期刊和类别的探路者网络(PFNET),并了解如何通过这个开放的百科全书来使用科学文献。除此之外,还通过价格指数研究了它们的过时情况。最初考虑了 Altmetric.com 上提供的总共 1433457 条参考文献。经过预处理并将其链接到爱思唯尔的 CiteScore Metrics 数据后,样本减少到 847512 条参考文献,这些参考文献由 193802 篇维基百科文章引用,指向 Scopus 索引的 14149 种期刊中的 598746 篇科学文章。作为突出的结果,我们发现“医学”和“生物化学、遗传学和分子生物学”论文的存在具有重要意义,并且最重要的期刊本质上是多学科的,这也表明高影响因子期刊更有可能被引用。此外,维基百科引文只有 13.44% 是开放获取期刊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/6dc9ec70a129/pone.0228713.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/4c7225d2a98f/pone.0228713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/2228c9364dbb/pone.0228713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/c52aac338093/pone.0228713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/ab5a06353bee/pone.0228713.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/3f1f5fa92bbf/pone.0228713.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/0d9473bf97d0/pone.0228713.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/42e386328600/pone.0228713.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/c478c207ac58/pone.0228713.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/f1fd76c297f5/pone.0228713.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/817bfe43f6f6/pone.0228713.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/6dc9ec70a129/pone.0228713.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/4c7225d2a98f/pone.0228713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/2228c9364dbb/pone.0228713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/c52aac338093/pone.0228713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/ab5a06353bee/pone.0228713.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/3f1f5fa92bbf/pone.0228713.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/0d9473bf97d0/pone.0228713.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/42e386328600/pone.0228713.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/c478c207ac58/pone.0228713.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/f1fd76c297f5/pone.0228713.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/817bfe43f6f6/pone.0228713.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11b/7010282/6dc9ec70a129/pone.0228713.g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks.通过维基百科看科学:通过共引网络呈现的开放知识新形式
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 10;15(2):e0228713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228713. eCollection 2020.
2
References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature.任何人都可以编辑的参考文献:同行评议的健康科学文献中对维基百科引文的审查。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 6;348:g1585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1585.
3
The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis.维基百科所评选的最具影响力医学期刊:定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 18;21(1):e11429. doi: 10.2196/11429.
4
An Analysis of Altmetrics in Emergency Medicine.急诊医学中的替代计量学分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):251-68. doi: 10.1111/acem.12898. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
5
Measuring the quality of scientific references in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800 000 scientific articles.测量维基百科中科学参考文献的质量:对超过 80 万篇科学文章的 11500 多万次引用的分析。
FEBS J. 2021 Jul;288(14):4242-4248. doi: 10.1111/febs.15608. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.伊朗和土耳其医学科学进展的批判性评估:资源有限的发展中国家为科学产出做出有效贡献的途径。
Arch Iran Med. 2011 Nov;14(6):370-7.
7
Measuring the social impact of nursing research: An insight into altmetrics.测量护理研究的社会影响力:对替代计量学的深入了解。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jul;75(7):1394-1405. doi: 10.1111/jan.13921. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
[Brazilian scientific journals in speech-language and hearing science: impact indicator].[巴西言语语言和听力科学领域的科学期刊:影响指标]
Pro Fono. 2006 Jan-Apr;18(1):99-110. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000100012.
9
Correlation Between Altmetric Score and Citations in Pediatric Surgery Core Journals.儿科外科核心期刊中 Altmetric 分数与引文的相关性。
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 30.
10
Citation analysis of five journals in andrology.男科学领域五本期刊的引文分析
Arch Androl. 2006 Nov-Dec;52(6):433-40. doi: 10.1080/01485010600840764.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards multiple ontologies in science mapping. A tribute to Loet Leydesdorff.迈向科学图谱中的多重本体。献给洛特·莱德斯多夫。
Scientometrics. 2025;130(6):3229-3255. doi: 10.1007/s11192-025-05323-0. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach.维基百科中的引文对了解研究影响力的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):88-94. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1730. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Wikipedia as a tool for contemporary history of science: A case study on CRISPR.维基百科作为科学当代史的工具:以 CRISPR 为例。

本文引用的文献

1
Document co-citation analysis to enhance transdisciplinary research.文献共被引分析以促进跨学科研究。
Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 3;4(1):e1701130. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701130. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Power laws in citation distributions: evidence from Scopus.引文分布中的幂律:来自Scopus的证据。
Scientometrics. 2015;103(1):213-228. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1524-z. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
3
References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature.任何人都可以编辑的参考文献:同行评议的健康科学文献中对维基百科引文的审查。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0290827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290827. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluative altmetrics: is there evidence for its application to research evaluation?评价性替代计量指标:其应用于研究评价的证据是否存在?
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Jul 25;8:1188131. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1188131. eCollection 2023.
5
A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9: an exploratory case study.维基百科上关于CRISPR/Cas-9文章中引用延迟的历时性视角:一项探索性案例研究。
Scientometrics. 2023;128(6):3649-3673. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04703-8. Epub 2023 May 14.
6
Social Media: Flattening Hierarchies for Women and Black, Indigenous, People Of Color (BIPOC) to Enter the Room Where It Happens.社交媒体:为女性和黑人、原住民以及有色人种(BIPOC)消除层级,让他们进入决策现场。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 15;74(Suppl_3):S222-S228. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac047.
7
A scholarly network of AI research with an information science focus: Global North and Global South perspectives.一个以信息科学为重点的人工智能研究学术网络:全球北方和全球南方的视角。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 15;17(4):e0266565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266565. eCollection 2022.
8
Crowdsourcing biocuration: The Community Assessment of Community Annotation with Ontologies (CACAO).众包生物注释:使用本体的社区注释评估 (CACAO)。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Oct 28;17(10):e1009463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009463. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
How the Field of Infectious Diseases Can Leverage Digital Strategy and Social Media Use During a Pandemic.传染病领域如何在大流行期间利用数字战略和社交媒体应用。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 19;8(2):ofab027. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab027. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Measuring the quality of scientific references in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800 000 scientific articles.测量维基百科中科学参考文献的质量:对超过 80 万篇科学文章的 11500 多万次引用的分析。
FEBS J. 2021 Jul;288(14):4242-4248. doi: 10.1111/febs.15608. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
BMJ. 2014 Mar 6;348:g1585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1585.
4
Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories.基于新版《科学引文索引》类目的全球科学地图。
Scientometrics. 2013 Feb;94(2):589-593. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0784-8. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
5
Altmetrics: Value all research products.替代计量学:重视所有研究成果。
Nature. 2013 Jan 10;493(7431):159. doi: 10.1038/493159a.
6
Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science.点击流数据生成了科学的高分辨率地图。
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004803. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
7
NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.科学论文网络
Science. 1965 Jul 30;149(3683):510-5. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510.
8
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.为何不应使用期刊影响因子来评估研究。
BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498-502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497.