Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont MA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brain. 2020 Feb 1;143(2):701-710. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa002.
The efficacy of dopamine agonists in treating major depressive disorder has been hypothesized to stem from effects on ventrostriatal dopamine and reward function. However, an important question is whether dopamine agonists are most beneficial for patients with reward-based deficits. This study evaluated whether measures of reward processing and ventrostriatal dopamine function predicted response to the dopamine agonist, pramipexole (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033369). Individuals with major depressive disorder (n = 26) and healthy controls (n = 26) (mean ± SD age = 26.5 ± 5.9; 50% female) first underwent assessments of reward learning behaviour and ventrostriatal prediction error signalling (measured using functional MRI). 11C-(+)-PHNO PET before and after oral amphetamine was used to assess ventrostriatal dopamine release. The depressed group then received open-label pramipexole treatment for 6 weeks (0.5 mg/day titrated to a maximum daily dose of 2.5 mg). Symptoms were assessed weekly, and reward learning was reassessed post-treatment. At baseline, relative to controls, the depressed group showed lower reward learning (P = 0.02), a trend towards blunted reward-related prediction error signals (P = 0.07), and a trend towards increased amphetamine-induced dopamine release (P = 0.07). Despite symptom improvements following pramipexole (Cohen's d ranging from 0.51 to 2.16 across symptom subscales), reward learning did not change after treatment. At a group level, baseline reward learning (P = 0.001) and prediction error signalling (P = 0.004) were both associated with symptom improvement, albeit in a direction opposite to initial predictions: patients with stronger pretreatment reward learning and reward-related prediction error signalling improved most. Baseline D2/3 receptor availability (P = 0.02) and dopamine release (P = 0.05) also predicted improvements in clinical functioning, with lower D2/3 receptor availability and lower dopamine release predicting greater improvements. Although these findings await replication, they suggest that measures of reward-related mesolimbic dopamine function may hold promise for identifying depressed individuals likely to respond favourably to dopaminergic pharmacotherapy.
多巴胺激动剂治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效,据推测源于其对腹侧纹状体多巴胺和奖励功能的影响。然而,一个重要的问题是多巴胺激动剂是否对基于奖励的缺陷患者最有益。这项研究评估了奖励处理和腹侧纹状体多巴胺功能的测量是否可以预测多巴胺激动剂普拉克索的反应(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02033369)。重性抑郁障碍患者(n=26)和健康对照组(n=26)(平均±SD 年龄=26.5±5.9;50%为女性)首先接受奖励学习行为和腹侧纹状体预测错误信号的评估(使用功能磁共振成像进行测量)。口服苯丙胺前后使用 11C-(+)-PHNO PET 评估腹侧纹状体多巴胺释放。然后,抑郁组接受普拉克索开放标签治疗 6 周(0.5mg/天滴定至最大每日剂量 2.5mg)。每周评估症状,治疗后重新评估奖励学习。在基线时,与对照组相比,抑郁组的奖励学习能力较低(P=0.02),奖励相关预测错误信号的趋势减弱(P=0.07),苯丙胺诱导的多巴胺释放趋势增加(P=0.07)。尽管普拉克索治疗后症状改善(Cohen's d 从症状子量表的 0.51 到 2.16 不等),但治疗后奖励学习没有变化。在群体水平上,基线奖励学习(P=0.001)和预测错误信号(P=0.004)均与症状改善相关,尽管与最初的预测相反:奖励学习和奖励相关预测错误信号较强的患者改善最大。基线 D2/3 受体可用性(P=0.02)和多巴胺释放(P=0.05)也预测了临床功能的改善,较低的 D2/3 受体可用性和较低的多巴胺释放预示着更大的改善。尽管这些发现有待复制,但它们表明与奖励相关的中脑边缘多巴胺功能的测量可能有助于识别对多巴胺能药物治疗反应良好的抑郁患者。