• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奖励预测误差的神经和情绪影响与重度抑郁症的关联。

Association of Neural and Emotional Impacts of Reward Prediction Errors With Major Depression.

作者信息

Rutledge Robb B, Moutoussis Michael, Smittenaar Peter, Zeidman Peter, Taylor Tanja, Hrynkiewicz Louise, Lam Jordan, Skandali Nikolina, Siegel Jenifer Z, Ousdal Olga T, Prabhu Gita, Dayan Peter, Fonagy Peter, Dolan Raymond J

机构信息

Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, England2Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, England.

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, England.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;74(8):790-797. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1713.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1713
PMID:28678984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710549/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with deficits in representing reward prediction errors (RPEs), which are the difference between experienced and predicted reward. Reward prediction errors underlie learning of values in reinforcement learning models, are represented by phasic dopamine release, and are known to affect momentary mood.

OBJECTIVE

To combine functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and smartphone-based large-scale data collection to test, in the absence of learning-related concerns, the hypothesis that depression attenuates the impact of RPEs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected on 32 individuals with moderate MDD and 20 control participants who performed a probabilistic reward task. A risky decision task with repeated happiness ratings as a measure of momentary mood was also tested in the laboratory in 74 participants and with a smartphone-based platform in 1833 participants. The study was conducted from November 20, 2012, to February 17, 2015.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Blood oxygen level-dependent activity was measured in ventral striatum, a dopamine target area known to represent RPEs. Momentary mood was measured during risky decision making.

RESULTS

Of the 52 fMRI participants (mean [SD] age, 34.0 [9.1] years), 30 (58%) were women and 32 had MDD. Of the 74 participants in the laboratory risky decision task (mean age, 34.2 [10.3] years), 44 (59%) were women and 54 had MDD. Of the smartphone group, 543 (30%) had a depression history and 1290 (70%) had no depression history; 918 (50%) were women, and 593 (32%) were younger than 30 years. Contrary to previous results in reinforcement learning tasks, individuals with moderate depression showed intact RPE signals in ventral striatum (z = 3.16; P = .002) that did not differ significantly from controls (z = 0.91; P = .36). Symptom severity correlated with baseline mood parameters in laboratory (ρ = -0.54; P < 1 × 10-6) and smartphone (ρ = -0.30; P < 1 × 10-39) data. However, participants with depression showed an intact association between RPEs and happiness in a computational model of momentary mood dynamics (z = 4.55; P < .001) that was not attenuated compared with controls (z = -0.42; P = .67).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The neural and emotional impact of RPEs is intact in major depression. These results suggest that depression does not affect the expression of dopaminergic RPEs and that attenuated RPEs in previous reports may reflect downstream effects more closely related to aberrant behavior. The correlation between symptom severity and baseline mood parameters supports an association between depression and momentary mood fluctuations during cognitive tasks. These results demonstrate a potential for smartphones in large-scale computational phenotyping, which is a goal for computational psychiatry.

摘要

重要性

重度抑郁症(MDD)与奖励预测误差(RPE)表征缺陷有关,奖励预测误差是指实际获得的奖励与预期奖励之间的差异。奖励预测误差是强化学习模型中价值学习的基础,由阶段性多巴胺释放来表征,并且已知会影响瞬时情绪。

目的

结合功能神经影像学、计算建模和基于智能手机的大规模数据收集,在不存在与学习相关问题的情况下,检验抑郁症会减弱奖励预测误差影响这一假设。

设计、背景和参与者:对32名中度MDD患者和20名对照参与者进行功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)数据收集,他们执行了一项概率奖励任务。在实验室中,对74名参与者以及在基于智能手机的平台上对1833名参与者进行了一项风险决策任务测试,该任务以重复的幸福度评分作为瞬时情绪的衡量指标。该研究于2012年11月20日至2015年2月17日进行。

主要结局和测量指标

在腹侧纹状体测量血氧水平依赖活动,腹侧纹状体是已知表征奖励预测误差的多巴胺靶区。在风险决策过程中测量瞬时情绪。

结果

在52名fMRI参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,34.0[9.1]岁)中,30名(58%)为女性,32名患有MDD。在74名参与实验室风险决策任务的参与者(平均年龄,34.2[10.3]岁)中,44名(59%)为女性,54名患有MDD。在智能手机组中,543名(30%)有抑郁症病史,1290名(70%)无抑郁症病史;918名(50%)为女性,593名(32%)年龄小于30岁。与强化学习任务中先前的结果相反,中度抑郁症患者在腹侧纹状体中显示出完整的奖励预测误差信号(z = 3.16;P = 0.002),与对照组无显著差异(z = 0.91;P = 0.36)。症状严重程度与实验室(ρ = -0.54;P < 1×10 - 6)和智能手机(ρ = -0.30;P < 1×10 - 39)数据中的基线情绪参数相关。然而,在瞬时情绪动态的计算模型中,抑郁症患者的奖励预测误差与幸福感之间存在完整的关联(z = 4.55;P < 0.001),与对照组相比未减弱(z = -0.42;P = 0.67)。

结论及意义

在重度抑郁症中,奖励预测误差的神经和情绪影响是完整的。这些结果表明,抑郁症不会影响多巴胺能奖励预测误差的表达,先前报告中减弱的奖励预测误差可能更紧密地反映了与异常行为相关的下游效应。症状严重程度与基线情绪参数之间的相关性支持抑郁症与认知任务期间瞬时情绪波动之间的关联。这些结果证明了智能手机在大规模计算表型分析中的潜力,这是计算精神病学追求的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/5710549/c70f54f7b78b/jamapsychiatry-74-790-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/5710549/6cb5cb34526a/jamapsychiatry-74-790-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/5710549/f5d46c89d8bf/jamapsychiatry-74-790-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/5710549/c70f54f7b78b/jamapsychiatry-74-790-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/5710549/6cb5cb34526a/jamapsychiatry-74-790-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/5710549/f5d46c89d8bf/jamapsychiatry-74-790-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/5710549/c70f54f7b78b/jamapsychiatry-74-790-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Neural and Emotional Impacts of Reward Prediction Errors With Major Depression.奖励预测误差的神经和情绪影响与重度抑郁症的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;74(8):790-797. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1713.
2
Reinforcement Learning Disruptions in Individuals With Depression and Sensitivity to Symptom Change Following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.抑郁症患者的强化学习中断与认知行为治疗后症状变化的敏感性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1113-1122. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1844.
3
Neural mechanisms of reinforcement learning in unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder.未服药的重性抑郁障碍患者强化学习的神经机制。
Brain. 2017 Apr 1;140(4):1147-1157. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx025.
4
Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in impaired decision making in juvenile attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.内侧前额叶皮质在青少年注意缺陷多动障碍中决策障碍的作用。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;71(10):1165-73. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1093.
5
Signed Reward Prediction Errors in the Ventral Striatum Drive Episodic Memory.腹侧纹状体中的签名奖励预测误差驱动情景记忆。
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 24;41(8):1716-1726. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1785-20.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Impaired reward prediction error encoding and striatal-midbrain connectivity in depression.抑郁症患者的奖励预测误差编码和纹状体-中脑连接受损。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jun;43(7):1581-1588. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0032-x. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
7
Chronic alcohol intake abolishes the relationship between dopamine synthesis capacity and learning signals in the ventral striatum.长期饮酒会消除腹侧纹状体中多巴胺合成能力与学习信号之间的关系。
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Feb;41(4):477-86. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12802. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
8
Abnormal temporal difference reward-learning signals in major depression.重度抑郁症中异常的时间差异奖励学习信号。
Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2084-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn136. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
9
Valuation in major depression is intact and stable in a non-learning environment.在非学习环境中,重度抑郁症的评估是完整且稳定的。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 10;7:44374. doi: 10.1038/srep44374.
10
Misperceiving Momentum: Computational Mechanisms of Biased Striatal Reward Prediction Errors in Bipolar Disorder.错判动量:双相情感障碍中纹状体奖励预测误差偏差的计算机制
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 Apr 30;4(4):100330. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100330. eCollection 2024 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
How working memory and reinforcement learning interact when avoiding punishment and pursuing reward concurrently.当同时避免惩罚和追求奖励时,工作记忆与强化学习是如何相互作用的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1037/xge0001817.
2
Leveraging stacked classifiers for exploring the role of hedonic processing between major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.利用堆叠分类器探索享乐加工在重度抑郁症和精神分裂症之间的作用。
Psychol Med. 2025 Jul 23;55:e211. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101207.
3
Examining working and episodic memory in young adults with anhedonia.

本文引用的文献

1
Dopaminergic Enhancement of Striatal Response to Reward in Major Depression.多巴胺能增强重度抑郁症患者纹状体对奖励的反应
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;174(4):378-386. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010111. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
2
Risk Taking for Potential Reward Decreases across the Lifespan.为获取潜在回报而冒险的行为会随着寿命的增长而减少。
Curr Biol. 2016 Jun 20;26(12):1634-1639. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
3
Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications.计算精神病学作为从神经科学通向临床应用的桥梁。
对患有快感缺乏症的年轻人的工作记忆和情景记忆进行研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01315-y.
4
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder: A Transcriptomic Approach.用于重度抑郁症的外周血单核细胞生物标志物:一种转录组学方法。
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Oct 3;2024:1089236. doi: 10.1155/2024/1089236. eCollection 2024.
5
Cross-species dissection of the modular role of the ventral tegmental area in depressive disorders.腹侧被盖区在抑郁症中模块化作用的跨物种剖析
Neuroscience. 2025 Mar 17;569:248-266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
6
Increasing the Construct Validity of Computational Phenotypes of Mental Illness Through Active Inference and Brain Imaging.通过主动推理和脑成像提高精神疾病计算表型的结构效度
Brain Sci. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1278. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121278.
7
Lack of optimistic bias during social evaluation learning reflects reduced positive self-beliefs in depression and social anxiety, but via distinct mechanisms.在社会评价学习中缺乏乐观偏见反映了抑郁和社交焦虑症患者积极的自我信念减少,但通过不同的机制。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72749-6.
8
Language sentiment predicts changes in depressive symptoms.语言情绪可预测抑郁症状的变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2321321121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321321121. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.重新审视计算神经影像学在整合神经科学时代的作用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Nov;50(1):103-113. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01946-8. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
10
Components of Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression Engage Specific Reinforcement Learning Mechanisms in a Pilot Study.一项初步研究表明,抑郁症行为激活疗法的组成部分涉及特定的强化学习机制。
Comput Psychiatr. 2022 Oct 13;6(1):238-255. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.81. eCollection 2022.
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):404-13. doi: 10.1038/nn.4238.
4
Prefrontal cortical regulation of brainwide circuit dynamics and reward-related behavior.前额叶皮质对全脑回路动力学及奖赏相关行为的调节
Science. 2016 Jan 1;351(6268):aac9698. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9698.
5
Proactive and Reactive Response Inhibition across the Lifespan.贯穿一生的主动和反应性反应抑制
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0140383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140383. eCollection 2015.
6
Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making and Subjective Well-Being.多巴胺能对决策和主观幸福感的调节
J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;35(27):9811-22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0702-15.2015.
7
Age-related changes in working memory and the ability to ignore distraction.与年龄相关的工作记忆变化以及忽略干扰的能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6515-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504162112. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
Depression: a decision-theoretic analysis.抑郁:一种决策理论分析。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:1-23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033928. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
9
Computational psychiatry.计算精神病学
Neuron. 2014 Nov 5;84(3):638-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.018.
10
Reward processing dysfunction in major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中的奖赏处理功能障碍。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;28(1):7-12. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000122.