Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2473-2482. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06641-7. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
Since 2004, uterine fibroids have been treated with MR-HIFU, but there are persevering doubts on long-term efficacy to date. In the Focused Ultrasound Myoma Outcome Study (FUMOS), we evaluated long-term outcomes after MR-HIFU therapy, primarily to assess the reintervention rate.
Data was retrospectively collected from 123 patients treated with MR-HIFU at our hospital from 2010 to 2017. Follow-up duration and baseline (MRI) characteristics were retrieved from medical records. Treatment failures, adverse events, and the nonperfused volume percentage (NPV%) were determined. Patients received a questionnaire about reinterventions, recovery time, satisfaction, and pregnancy outcomes. Restrictive treatment protocols were compared with unrestrictive (aiming for complete ablation) treatments. Subgroups were analyzed based on the achieved NPV < 50 or ≥ 50%.
Treatment failures occurred in 12.1% and the number of adverse events was 13.7%. Implementation of an unrestrictive treatment protocol significantly (p = 0.006) increased the mean NPV% from 37.4% [24.3-53.0] to 57.4% [33.5-76.5]. At 63.5 ± 29.0 months follow-up, the overall reintervention rate was 33.3% (n = 87). All reinterventions were performed within 34 months follow-up, but within 21 months in the unrestrictive group. The reintervention rate significantly (p = 0.002) decreased from 48.8% in the restrictive group (n = 43; follow-up 87.5 ± 7.3 months) to 18.2% in the unrestrictive group (n = 44; follow-up 40.0 ± 22.1 months). The median recovery time was 2.0 [1.0-7.0] days. Treatment satisfaction rate was 72.4% and 4/11 women completed family planning after MR-HIFU.
The unrestrictive treatment protocol significantly increased the NPV%. Unrestrictive MR-HIFU treatments led to acceptable reintervention rates comparable to other reimbursed uterine-sparing treatments, and no reinterventions were reported beyond 21 months follow-up.
• All reinterventions were performed within 34 months follow-up, but in the unrestrictive treatment protocol group, no reinterventions were reported beyond 21 months follow-up. • The NPV% was negatively associated with the risk of reintervention; thus, operators should aim for complete ablation during MR-guided HIFU therapy of uterine fibroids. • Unrestrictive treatments have led to acceptable reintervention rates after MR-guided HIFU therapy compared to other reimbursed uterine-sparing treatments.
自 2004 年以来,子宫肌瘤一直采用磁共振引导高强度聚焦超声(MR-HIFU)治疗,但迄今为止,其长期疗效仍存在争议。在聚焦超声肌瘤结局研究(FUMOS)中,我们评估了 MR-HIFU 治疗后的长期疗效,主要评估再次干预的比率。
我们回顾性收集了 2010 年至 2017 年在我院接受 MR-HIFU 治疗的 123 名患者的数据。从病历中获取随访时间和基线(MRI)特征。确定治疗失败、不良事件和未灌注体积百分比(NPV%)。患者接受了关于再次干预、恢复时间、满意度和妊娠结局的问卷调查。将限制性治疗方案与非限制性(旨在完全消融)治疗方案进行比较。根据实现的 NPV<50%或≥50%进行亚组分析。
12.1%的患者发生治疗失败,13.7%的患者发生不良事件。实施非限制性治疗方案显著(p=0.006)提高了平均 NPV%,从 37.4%[24.3-53.0]提高到 57.4%[33.5-76.5]。在 63.5±29.0 个月的随访中,总的再次干预率为 33.3%(n=87)。所有再次干预均在随访 34 个月内进行,但在非限制性组中,所有再次干预均在随访 21 个月内进行。再次干预率显著(p=0.002)降低,从限制性组的 48.8%(n=43;随访 87.5±7.3 个月)降至非限制性组的 18.2%(n=44;随访 40.0±22.1 个月)。中位恢复时间为 2.0[1.0-7.0]天。治疗满意度为 72.4%,4/11 名女性在接受 MR-HIFU 治疗后完成了计划生育。
非限制性治疗方案显著提高了 NPV%。非限制性 MR-HIFU 治疗可导致可接受的再次干预率,与其他有补偿的保留子宫治疗相当,且在随访 21 个月后,无再次干预报告。
所有再次干预均在随访 34 个月内进行,但在非限制性治疗方案组中,随访 21 个月后,无再次干预报告。
NPV%与再次干预的风险呈负相关;因此,在磁共振引导高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤时,操作人员应目标实现完全消融。
与其他有补偿的保留子宫治疗相比,非限制性治疗在接受磁共振引导高强度聚焦超声治疗后导致了可接受的再次干预率。