• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人为活动的影响与违反环境法规所制定的地表水质量标准的相对风险计算:以巴西皮拉西卡巴和帕拉奥佩巴河流域为例

Impacts of anthropogenic activities and calculation of the relative risk of violating surface water quality standards established by environmental legislation: a case study from the Piracicaba and Paraopeba river basins, Brazil.

机构信息

Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):14085-14099. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07647-1. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-07647-1
PMID:32040737
Abstract

The nonparametric test of Kruskal-Wallis and relative risk were used to evaluate surface water quality allowed to an identification of the most degraded water bodies in Piracicaba River and Paraopeba River basins, two important hydrographic basins in Brazil. Total manganese, dissolved iron, and fecal contamination indicator were considered the most relevant parameters for the characterization of water quality in the basins. The Peixe River, in Nova Era, and Pedras Creek, in Betim, were considered the most impacted water bodies in the Piracicaba River and Paraopeba River basins, respectively. The analysis of violations and the relative risk confirmed that both basins are subject to impacts resulting from economic activities. On comparing the relative risks, the Paraopeba River basin showed a higher risk of violation for 5-day biological oxygen demand (BOD), total manganese, total phosphorus, total suspended solids, and turbidity, while the Piracicaba River basin showed a higher risk of violation for fecal contamination indicator. The release of domestic sewage and industrial effluents, mining activities, and diffuse pollution from agriculture and pasture areas were responsible for the surface water quality deterioration in these basins. The results show the need for investment in basic sanitation, improved treatment efficiency for industrial effluents, adequate soil management, riparian vegetation preservation, and environmental education actions.

摘要

采用 Kruskal-Wallis 非参数检验和相对风险评估来评估皮拉西卡巴河和帕拉奥佩巴河流域的地表水水质,这两个流域是巴西两个重要的水文流域。总锰、溶解铁和粪便污染指标被认为是流域水质特征的最相关参数。皮拉西卡巴河流域的皮谢河和帕拉奥佩巴河流域的佩达斯河分别被认为是受影响最严重的水体。违规行为和相对风险分析证实,这两个流域都受到经济活动影响。通过比较相对风险,帕拉奥佩巴河流域在五日生化需氧量(BOD)、总锰、总磷、总悬浮固体和浊度方面的违规风险更高,而皮拉西卡巴河流域在粪便污染指标方面的违规风险更高。生活污水和工业废水的排放、采矿活动以及农业和牧场地区的漫射污染是导致这些流域地表水水质恶化的原因。结果表明,需要投资于基本卫生设施、提高工业废水处理效率、适当的土壤管理、河岸植被保护和环境教育行动。

相似文献

1
Impacts of anthropogenic activities and calculation of the relative risk of violating surface water quality standards established by environmental legislation: a case study from the Piracicaba and Paraopeba river basins, Brazil.人为活动的影响与违反环境法规所制定的地表水质量标准的相对风险计算:以巴西皮拉西卡巴和帕拉奥佩巴河流域为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):14085-14099. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07647-1. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
The use of multivariate statistical methods for optimization of the surface water quality network monitoring in the Paraopeba river basin, Brazil.运用多元统计方法优化巴西帕拉奥佩巴河流域地表水质量网络监测。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 28;190(8):491. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6873-2.
3
Evaluation of violations in water quality standards in the monitoring network of São Francisco River basin, the third largest in Brazil.对巴西第三大流域圣弗朗西斯科河流域监测网络中水质标准违规情况的评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Oct 30;189(11):590. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6266-y.
4
Assessment of spatial variations in the surface water quality of the Velhas River Basin, Brazil, using multivariate statistical analysis and nonparametric statistics.采用多元统计分析和非参数统计方法评估巴西 Velhas 河流域地表水水质的空间变化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Feb 16;191(3):164. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7281-y.
5
Use of multivariate statistical methods to analyze the monitoring of surface water quality in the Doce River basin, Minas Gerais, Brazil.运用多元统计方法分析巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州多斯雷斯流域地表水水质监测情况。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(28):35303-35318. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09783-0. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
A framework model to integrate sources and pathways in the assessment of river water pollution.一种整合河流水污染评估中源和途径的框架模型。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Apr 15;347:123661. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123661. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
7
A partial least squares-path model of causality among environmental deterioration indicators in the dry period of Paraopeba River after the rupture of B1 tailings dam in Brumadinho (Minas Gerais, Brazil).巴罗普雷图崩坝后帕拉奥佩巴河枯水期环境恶化指标间因果关系的偏最小二乘路径模型(巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州)。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Aug 1;306:119341. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119341. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Impact of fecal contamination on surface water quality in the São Francisco River hydrographic basin in Minas Gerais, Brazil.巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州圣弗朗西斯科河流域地表水粪污染的影响。
J Water Health. 2020 Feb;18(1):48-59. doi: 10.2166/wh.2019.153.
9
Quality index of the surface water of Amazonian rivers in industrial areas in Pará, Brazil.巴西帕拉州亚马逊河流域工业区地表水质量指数。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Oct 15;123(1-2):156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Composition of particulate and dissolved organic matter in a disturbed watershed of southeast Brazil (Piracicaba River basin).巴西东南部一个受干扰流域(皮拉西卡巴河流域)中颗粒态和溶解态有机物质的组成
Water Res. 2002 Jun;36(11):2743-52. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00495-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Analysis Between Physical-Chemical and Biological Conditions in the River and the Incidence of Diseases in the City of Piracicaba, Brazil.巴西皮拉西卡巴市河流理化和生物条件与疾病发病率的相关性分析
Toxics. 2025 Apr 30;13(5):359. doi: 10.3390/toxics13050359.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of spatial variations in the surface water quality of the Velhas River Basin, Brazil, using multivariate statistical analysis and nonparametric statistics.采用多元统计分析和非参数统计方法评估巴西 Velhas 河流域地表水水质的空间变化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Feb 16;191(3):164. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7281-y.
2
The use of multivariate statistical methods for optimization of the surface water quality network monitoring in the Paraopeba river basin, Brazil.运用多元统计方法优化巴西帕拉奥佩巴河流域地表水质量网络监测。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 28;190(8):491. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6873-2.
3
Evaluation of violations in water quality standards in the monitoring network of São Francisco River basin, the third largest in Brazil.
对巴西第三大流域圣弗朗西斯科河流域监测网络中水质标准违规情况的评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Oct 30;189(11):590. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6266-y.
4
Assessment of water quality parameters using multivariate analysis for Klang River basin, Malaysia.运用多变量分析评估马来西亚巴生河流域的水质参数
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Jan;187(1):4182. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4182-y. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
5
Application of multivariate statistical techniques in the assessment of water quality in the Southwest New Territories and Kowloon, Hong Kong.多元统计技术在评估香港新界西南部和九龙水质中的应用。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Feb;173(1-4):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1366-y. Epub 2010 Feb 27.
6
When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk?何时使用比值比或相对危险度?
Int J Public Health. 2008;53(3):165-7. doi: 10.1007/s00038-008-7068-3.
7
[Agricultural activity and environmental externality: an analysis of the use of pesticides in the Brazilian savannah].[农业活动与环境外部性:对巴西大草原农药使用情况的分析]
Cien Saude Colet. 2007 Jan-Mar;12(1):131-43. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232007000100016.
8
Relative risks and odds ratios: what's the difference?相对风险与比值比:有何区别?
J Fam Pract. 2004 Feb;53(2):108.
9
On estimating the relation between blood group and disease.关于评估血型与疾病之间的关系。
Ann Hum Genet. 1955 Jun;19(4):251-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01348.x.