Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Oct;5(4):358-365. doi: 10.1177/2380084420906114. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
Children's access to dental general anesthesia (DGA) is limited, with highly variable wait times. Access factors occur at the levels of facility, dental provider, and anesthesia provider. It is unknown if these factors also influence utilization of dental surgery. We characterized patterns in DGA utilization by system, provider, population, and individual disease levels to explain variation.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of Medicaid-enrolled children (≤9 y) who received DGA in Massachusetts, Maryland, Texas, Connecticut, Washington, Illinois, and Florida from 2011 to 2012. DGA events were characterized by the place of service, measures of disease burden, average reimbursements for dental provider and anesthesia provider, and average total expenditures.
A total of 10,149,793 children met study eligibility criteria. States with similar patterns of caries-related visits, such as Illinois (16% of Medicaid enrollees had a caries-related claim) and Washington (22%), had different DGA rates (1% and 17%, respectively). Reimbursement rates for dental providers, DGA services, and nonhospital places of services did not consistently align in states with higher DGA rates. Surgical extraction rates, as a proxy for the most severe disease, exceeded 75% in Maryland, which had the lowest DGA rate (0.3%).
Variation in DGA rates across states was not explained by reimbursements rates (provider, DGA services, place of service) or population or individual level of caries burden. Efforts to evaluate and alter utilization of DGA should consider factors such as dental and anesthesia provider capacity, health facility capacity (hospital vs. ambulatory surgery center vs. office), and population- and individual-level disease burden. Our negative findings suggest the presence of other social determinants of oral health that influence utilization of services (e.g., race/ethnicity, language preference, immigration status, policy and budget goals), which should be explored. Our findings also raise the specter that variation in surgical rates may represent instances of unmet needs or overtreatment.
The results of this study can be used by clinicians and policy makers as they address policy and clinical interventions to influence children with severe caries. Interventions to change utilization of surgical services on a population level may need to include state-specific factors that extend beyond reimbursement, disease burden, anesthesia provider type, or facility type.
儿童获得牙科全身麻醉(DGA)的机会有限,且等待时间差异很大。获取机会存在于医疗机构、牙科医生和麻醉师三个层面。目前尚不清楚这些因素是否也会影响牙科手术的利用。本研究通过系统、提供者、人群和个体疾病水平来描述 DGA 利用的模式,以解释差异。
我们对 2011 年至 2012 年在马萨诸塞州、马里兰州、德克萨斯州、康涅狄格州、华盛顿州、伊利诺伊州和佛罗里达州接受 DGA 的符合条件的 Medicaid 参保儿童(≤9 岁)进行了横断面分析。通过服务场所、疾病负担指标、牙科医生和麻醉师的平均报酬以及总平均支出来描述 DGA 事件。
共有 10149793 名儿童符合研究条件。伊利诺伊州(16%的 Medicaid 参保者有龋齿相关的索赔)和华盛顿州(22%)的儿童有相似的龋齿就诊模式,但 DGA 率却不同(分别为 1%和 17%)。在 DGA 率较高的州,牙科医生、DGA 服务和非医院服务场所的报酬率并不一致。手术拔牙率(作为最严重疾病的代表)在马里兰州超过 75%,而马里兰州的 DGA 率最低(0.3%)。
各州之间 DGA 率的差异不能用报酬率(提供者、DGA 服务、服务场所)或人群或个体龋齿负担来解释。评估和改变 DGA 的利用应该考虑牙科和麻醉师的能力、医疗机构的能力(医院与门诊手术中心与办公室)以及人群和个体疾病负担等因素。我们的阴性发现表明,口腔健康的其他社会决定因素可能会影响服务的利用(例如,种族/民族、语言偏好、移民身份、政策和预算目标),这需要进一步探讨。我们的研究结果还表明,手术率的差异可能代表未满足的需求或过度治疗的情况。
本研究结果可由临床医生和决策者用于解决政策和临床干预措施,以影响患有严重龋齿的儿童。在人群层面上改变手术服务的利用可能需要考虑州特定的因素,这些因素超出了报销、疾病负担、麻醉师类型或医疗机构类型。