美国环保署农药风险评估中应用《食品安全保护法》儿童健康安全系数。

Application of the Food Quality Protection Act children's health safety factor in the U.S. EPA pesticide risk assessments.

机构信息

Environmental Working Group, 1436 U St NW, Suite 100, Washington DC, 20009, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health. 2020 Feb 10;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-0571-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, or FQPA, required the Environmental Protection Agency to set allowable levels for pesticides in a way that would "ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue." The act stipulated that an additional tenfold margin of safety for pesticide risk assessments shall be applied to account for pre- and postnatal toxicity and for any data gaps regarding pesticide exposure and toxicity, unless there are reliable data to demonstrate that a different margin would be safe for infants and children.

DISCUSSION

To examine the implementation of the FQPA-mandated additional margin of safety, this analysis reviews 59 pesticide risk assessments published by the EPA between 2011 and 2019. The list includes 12 pesticides used in the largest amount in the U.S.; a group of 35 pesticides detected on fruits and vegetables; and 12 organophosphate pesticides. For the non-organophosphate pesticides reviewed here, the EPA applied an additional children's health safety factor in 13% of acute dietary exposure scenarios and 12% of chronic dietary exposure scenarios. For incidental oral, dermal and inhalation exposures, additional FQPA factors were applied for 15, 31, and 41%, respectively, of the non-organophosphate pesticides, primarily due to data uncertainties. For the organophosphate pesticides as a group, a tenfold children's health safety factor was proposed in 2015. Notably, in 2017 that decision was reversed for chlorpyrifos.

CONCLUSIONS

For the majority of pesticides reviewed in this study, the EPA did not apply an additional FQPA safety factor, missing an opportunity to fully use the FQPA authority for protecting children's health.

摘要

背景

1996 年的《食品安全强化法案》(Food Quality Protection Act of 1996,简称 FQPA)要求美国环境保护署(Environmental Protection Agency,简称 EPA)以一种“确保婴幼儿不会因接触农药化学残留而受到综合影响而产生危害的合理确定性”的方式,为农药设定允许水平。该法案规定,在进行农药风险评估时,应额外增加十倍的安全系数,以考虑到产前和产后的毒性,以及关于农药接触和毒性的数据空白,除非有可靠的数据表明对婴幼儿来说,采用不同的安全系数是安全的。

讨论

为了检验 FQPA 规定的额外安全系数的实施情况,本分析审查了 EPA 于 2011 年至 2019 年期间发布的 59 份农药风险评估报告。这份清单包括美国使用量最大的 12 种农药;一组在水果和蔬菜上检测到的 35 种农药;以及 12 种有机磷农药。对于这里审查的非有机磷农药,EPA 在 13%的急性饮食暴露情景和 12%的慢性饮食暴露情景中应用了儿童健康安全系数。对于偶然的口服、皮肤和吸入暴露,非有机磷农药的额外 FQPA 系数分别应用于 15%、31%和 41%,这主要是由于数据不确定性。对于有机磷农药组,2015 年提出了十倍的儿童健康安全系数。值得注意的是,2017 年,该决定被推翻,不再适用于毒死蜱。

结论

对于本研究中审查的大多数农药,EPA 没有应用额外的 FQPA 安全系数,错失了充分利用 FQPA 保护儿童健康的权威的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ab/7011289/4111aa48b1e4/12940_2020_571_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索