Flinders University, Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Cancer Council New South Wales, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, NSW, 2011, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 10;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0915-1.
Globally children's diet quality is poor. Parents are primary gatekeepers to children's food intake; however, reaching and engaging parents in nutrition promotion can be challenging. With growth in internet and smartphone use, digital platforms provide potential to disseminate information rapidly to many people. The objectives of this review were to conduct a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of nutrition promotion via websites and apps supporting parents to influence children's nutrition, from three different perspectives: 1) current evidence base, 2) end user (parent) experience and 3) current commercial offerings.
Three systematic reviews were undertaken of (1) studies evaluating the effectiveness for digital platforms for improving nutrition in children and parents, (2) studies conducting user-testing of digital tools with parents, (3) websites and apps providing lunch-provision information to parents. Searches were conducted in five databases for reviews one and two, and systematic search of Google and App Store for review three. Randomised controlled trials, cohort and cross-sectional and qualitative studies (study two only) were included if published in English, from 2013, with the intervention targeted at parents and at least 50% of intervention content focused on nutrition. Search results were double screened, with data extracted into standardised spreadsheets and quality appraisal of included search results.
Studies evaluating digital nutrition interventions targeting parents (n = 11) demonstrated effectiveness for improving nutrition outcomes, self-efficacy and knowledge. Six of the included randomised controlled trials reported digital interventions to be equal to, or better than comparison groups. User-testing studies (n = 9) identified that digital platforms should include both informative content and interactive features. Parents wanted evidence-based information from credible sources, practical tools, engaging content and connection with other users and health professionals. Websites targeting lunch provision (n = 15) were developed primarily by credible sources and included information-based content consistent with dietary guidelines and limited interactive features. Lunchbox apps (n = 6), developed mostly by commercial organisations, were more interactive but provided less credible information.
Digital nutrition promotion interventions targeting parents can be effective for improving nutrition-related outcomes in children and parents. As demonstrated from the lunchbox context and user-testing with parents, they need to go beyond just providing information about positive dietary changes, to include the user-desired features supporting interactivity and personalisation.
全球儿童的饮食质量较差。父母是儿童饮食摄入的主要把关者;然而,要接触并吸引父母参与营养促进可能具有挑战性。随着互联网和智能手机使用的增长,数字平台提供了向许多人快速传播信息的潜力。本综述的目的是从三个不同角度(1)评估通过网站和应用程序支持父母影响儿童营养的营养促进的现有证据基础,(2)评估父母用户体验,(3)评估当前商业产品,对支持父母影响儿童营养的营养促进的数字平台进行全面系统的评价。
对(1)评估数字平台改善儿童和父母营养的有效性的研究,(2)对父母进行数字工具用户测试的研究,(3)为父母提供午餐提供信息的网站和应用程序进行了三项系统评价。对前两项研究进行了五项数据库搜索,对第三项研究进行了对谷歌和应用程序商店的系统搜索。如果研究以英文发表,且干预措施针对父母,且干预内容至少有 50%侧重于营养,则包括随机对照试验、队列和横断面以及定性研究(仅研究 2)。对研究结果进行了双重筛选,将数据提取到标准化电子表格中,并对纳入的研究结果进行了质量评估。
评估针对父母的数字营养干预措施的研究(n=11)表明,这些措施在改善营养结果、自我效能和知识方面是有效的。纳入的 11 项随机对照试验中有 6 项报告数字干预措施与对照组相当或更好。用户测试研究(n=9)发现,数字平台应包括信息内容和互动功能。父母希望从可信来源获得基于证据的信息、实用工具、吸引人的内容以及与其他用户和卫生专业人员的联系。针对午餐提供的网站(n=15)主要由可信来源开发,包括与饮食指南一致的基于信息的内容和有限的互动功能。由商业组织开发的午餐盒应用程序(n=6)更具互动性,但提供的信息可信度较低。
针对父母的数字营养促进干预措施可以有效改善儿童和父母的营养相关结果。从午餐盒背景和父母用户测试中可以看出,它们需要不仅仅提供有关积极饮食改变的信息,还需要包括用户所需的支持互动和个性化的功能。