• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿喂养网站与应用程序:质量与内容的系统评估

Infant Feeding Websites and Apps: A Systematic Assessment of Quality and Content.

作者信息

Taki Sarah, Campbell Karen J, Russell Catherine G, Elliott Rosalind, Laws Rachel, Denney-Wilson Elizabeth

机构信息

Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2015 Sep 29;4(3):e18. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4323.

DOI:10.2196/ijmr.4323
PMID:26420339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4704960/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internet websites and smartphone apps have become a popular resource to guide parents in their children's feeding and nutrition. Given the diverse range of websites and apps on infant feeding, the quality of information in these resources should be assessed to identify whether consumers have access to credible and reliable information.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic analysis provides perspectives on the information available about infant feeding on websites and smartphone apps.

METHODS

A systematic analysis was conducted to assess the quality, comprehensibility, suitability, and readability of websites and apps on infant feeding using a developed tool. Google and Bing were used to search for websites from Australia, while the App Store for iOS and Google Play for Android were used to search for apps. Specified key words including baby feeding, breast feeding, formula feeding and introducing solids were used to assess websites and apps addressing feeding advice. Criteria for assessing the accuracy of the content were developed using the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 600 websites and 2884 apps were screened, and 44 websites and 46 apps met the selection criteria and were analyzed. Most of the websites (26/44) and apps (43/46) were noncommercial, some websites (10/44) and 1 app were commercial and there were 8 government websites; 2 apps had university endorsement. The majority of the websites and apps were rated poor quality. There were two websites that had 100% coverage of information compared to those rated as fair or poor that had low coverage. Two-thirds of the websites (65%) and almost half of the apps (47%) had a readability level above the 8th grade level.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this unique analysis highlight the potential for website and app developers to merge user requirements with evidence-based content to ensure that information on infant feeding is of high quality. There are currently no apps available to consumers that address a variety of infant feeding topics. To keep up with the rapid turnover of the evolving technology, health professionals need to consider developing an app that will provide consumers with a credible and reliable source of information about infant feeding, using quality assessment tools and evidence-based content.

摘要

背景

互联网网站和智能手机应用程序已成为指导家长进行儿童喂养和营养的热门资源。鉴于婴儿喂养方面的网站和应用程序种类繁多,应评估这些资源中的信息质量,以确定消费者是否能够获取可信且可靠的信息。

目的

本系统分析提供了关于网站和智能手机应用程序上婴儿喂养可用信息的观点。

方法

使用一种开发的工具对婴儿喂养方面的网站和应用程序进行系统分析,以评估其质量、可理解性、适用性和可读性。利用谷歌和必应搜索澳大利亚的网站,同时使用适用于iOS的应用商店和适用于安卓的谷歌应用商店搜索应用程序。使用包括婴儿喂养、母乳喂养、配方奶喂养和引入固体食物等特定关键词来评估提供喂养建议的网站和应用程序。依据澳大利亚婴儿喂养指南制定了评估内容准确性的标准。

结果

共筛选了600个网站和2884个应用程序,44个网站和46个应用程序符合选择标准并进行了分析。大多数网站(26/44)和应用程序(43/46)是非商业性的,一些网站(10/44)和1个应用程序是商业性的,还有8个政府网站;2个应用程序得到了大学认可。大多数网站和应用程序的质量评级较差。有两个网站的信息覆盖率为100%,相比之下,那些评级为中等或较差的网站覆盖率较低。三分之二的网站(65%)和近一半的应用程序(47%)的可读性水平高于八年级水平。

结论

这一独特分析的结果凸显了网站和应用程序开发者将用户需求与基于证据的内容相结合的潜力,以确保婴儿喂养信息的高质量。目前消费者无法获取涉及多种婴儿喂养主题的应用程序。为了跟上不断发展的技术的快速更新,卫生专业人员需要考虑开发一款应用程序,该应用程序将使用质量评估工具和基于证据的内容,为消费者提供关于婴儿喂养的可信且可靠的信息来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9a/4704960/aecb43343f93/ijmr_v4i3e18_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9a/4704960/7c8504e3ffe8/ijmr_v4i3e18_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9a/4704960/c1bc7ac6d05c/ijmr_v4i3e18_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9a/4704960/aecb43343f93/ijmr_v4i3e18_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9a/4704960/7c8504e3ffe8/ijmr_v4i3e18_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9a/4704960/c1bc7ac6d05c/ijmr_v4i3e18_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9a/4704960/aecb43343f93/ijmr_v4i3e18_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Infant Feeding Websites and Apps: A Systematic Assessment of Quality and Content.婴儿喂养网站与应用程序:质量与内容的系统评估
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Sep 29;4(3):e18. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4323.
2
Content and Quality of Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: Five-Year Update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation.婴儿喂养智能手机应用程序的内容和质量:系统搜索和评估五年更新。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 27;8(5):e17300. doi: 10.2196/17300.
3
Interactivity, Quality, and Content of Websites Promoting Health Behaviors During Infancy: 6-Year Update of the Systematic Assessment.促进婴儿期健康行为的网站的互动性、质量和内容:系统评估的 6 年更新。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 7;24(10):e38641. doi: 10.2196/38641.
4
A systematic evaluation of digital nutrition promotion websites and apps for supporting parents to influence children's nutrition.系统评价数字营养推广网站和应用程序,以支持父母影响儿童营养。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 10;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0915-1.
5
How Do Infant Feeding Apps in China Measure Up? A Content Quality Assessment.中国的婴儿喂养应用程序表现如何?内容质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 6;5(12):e186. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8764.
6
Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality.用于双相情感障碍的移动应用程序:功能与内容质量的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 17;17(8):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4581.
7
Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis.药品相关应用程序和移动生态系统的数据共享实践:流量、内容和网络分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 20;364:l920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l920.
8
Evaluation of Breastfeeding App Features: Content Analysis Study.母乳喂养应用程序功能评估:内容分析研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Oct 26;5(4):e37581. doi: 10.2196/37581.
9
The Most Popular Smartphone Apps for Weight Loss: A Quality Assessment.最受欢迎的减肥智能手机应用程序:质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Dec 16;3(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4334.
10
Mobile Apps to Support Healthy Family Food Provision: Systematic Assessment of Popular, Commercially Available Apps.支持健康家庭食品供应的移动应用程序:对流行的商业可用应用程序的系统评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 21;6(12):e11867. doi: 10.2196/11867.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the System Usability Scale in the context of a childrearing app co-designed for low- and middle-income countries.在一款为低收入和中等收入国家共同设计的育儿应用程序背景下对系统可用性量表的心理测量学评估。
Digit Health. 2025 May 11;11:20552076251335413. doi: 10.1177/20552076251335413. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Usability Assessment Methods for Mobile Apps for Physical Rehabilitation: Umbrella Review.移动物理康复应用程序的可用性评估方法:伞式综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Oct 4;12:e49449. doi: 10.2196/49449.
3
Environmental Scan of Online Government Complementary Feeding Resources in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools.用于哮喘的移动应用程序的演变:对内容和工具的最新系统评估
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 23;13:58. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0303-x.
2
Assessing the quality and usability of smartphone apps for pain self-management.评估用于疼痛自我管理的智能手机应用程序的质量和可用性。
Pain Med. 2014 Jun;15(6):898-909. doi: 10.1111/pme.12327. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
3
A health promotion intervention can affect diet quality in early childhood.健康促进干预可以影响儿童早期的饮食质量。
美国在线政府辅食资源的环境扫描
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2024;49(5):276-283. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000001033. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
Provider perspectives on equity in use of mobile health autism screening tools.提供者对移动医疗自闭症筛查工具使用公平性的看法。
Autism. 2024 Aug;28(8):1947-1958. doi: 10.1177/13623613231215399. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
5
Outcome's Classification in Mobile Applications Tailored to Parents of Premature Infants: A Systematic Review.针对早产儿父母的移动应用程序中的结果分类:一项系统评价。
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Aug;52(8):1642-1655. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i8.13402.
6
A qualitative exploration of food portion size practices and awareness of food portion size guidance in first-time parents of one- to two-year-olds living in the UK.对英国 1 至 2 岁儿童的初为人父母者的食物份量做法和对食物份量指导的认识进行定性探索。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 13;23(1):1779. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16647-y.
7
Parental engagement with complementary feeding information in the United Kingdom: A qualitative evidence synthesis.英国父母对补充喂养信息的参与:定性证据综合。
Matern Child Nutr. 2023 Oct;19(4):e13553. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13553. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
8
Perinatal support for breastfeeding using mHealth: A mixed methods feasibility study of the My Baby Now app.使用移动健康(mHealth)为母乳喂养提供围产期支持:My Baby Now 应用程序的混合方法可行性研究。
Matern Child Nutr. 2023 Apr;19(2):e13482. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13482. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
9
Designing and developing a mobile app (BeBo) in a randomized controlled trial study to promote breastfeeding among Vietnamese mothers.在一项随机对照试验研究中设计和开发一款移动应用程序(BeBo),以促进越南母亲母乳喂养。
Int Breastfeed J. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13006-023-00543-7.
10
Application to promote communication between midwives and Arabic-speaking women at antenatal care: Challenges met by researchers when developing content.促进助产士与产前护理中讲阿拉伯语的女性之间沟通的应用:研究人员在开发内容时遇到的挑战。
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Nov 30;6:68. doi: 10.18332/ejm/156451. eCollection 2022.
J Nutr. 2013 Oct;143(10):1672-8. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.177931. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
4
Quality comparison of websites related to developmental disabilities.与发育障碍相关的网站质量比较。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3077-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
5
Smartphone apps to support hospital prescribing and pharmacology education: a review of current provision.支持医院处方开具和药理学教育的智能手机应用程序:当前应用情况综述
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;77(1):31-8. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12112.
6
Online resources for new mothers: opportunities and challenges for perinatal health professionals.新手妈妈的在线资源:围产期健康专业人员面临的机遇与挑战
J Perinat Educ. 2012 Spring;21(2):99-111. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.2.99.
7
Content and quality of information provided on canadian dementia websites.加拿大痴呆症相关网站上提供的信息内容与质量。
Can Geriatr J. 2013;16(1):6-15. doi: 10.5770/cgj.16.40. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
8
Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools.哮喘自我管理应用程序:内容和工具的系统评估。
BMC Med. 2012 Nov 22;10:144. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-144.
9
Assessing the quality, suitability and readability of internet-based health information about warfarin for patients.评估面向患者的关于华法林的网络健康信息的质量、适用性和可读性。
Australas Med J. 2012;5(3):194-203. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2012862. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
10
There's an app for that: content analysis of paid health and fitness apps.有一款针对此的应用程序:付费健康与健身应用程序的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 May 14;14(3):e72. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1977.