• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索医疗保健专业人员对急性和姑息治疗癌症护理中共同临床决策的看法。

Exploring Health Care Professionals' Perceptions Regarding Shared Clinical Decision-Making in Both Acute and Palliative Cancer Care.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316134.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316134
PMID:36498204
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9737093/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Developments in cancer care have resulted in improved survival and quality of life. Integration of acute and palliative cancer care is desirable, but not always achieved. Fragmented care is associated with sub-optimal communication and collaboration, resulting in unnecessary care transitions. The aim of this study was to explore how health care professionals, from both acute and palliative care, perceive clinical decision-making when caring for patients undergoing active cancer treatment in parallel with specialized palliative care at home.

METHODS

Qualitative explorative design, using online focus-group interviews, based on patient-cases, among health care professionals (physicians and nurses) and Framework Analysis.

RESULTS

Six online focus-group interviews were performed. Few signs of systematic integration were found, risking fragmented care, and putting the patients in a vulnerable situation. Different aspects of uncertainty related to mandates and goals-of-care impacted clinical decision-making. Organizational factors appeared to hinder mutual clinical decision-making as well as the uncertainty related to responsibilities. These uncertainties seemed to be a barrier to timely end-of-life conversations and clinical decisions on optimal care, for example, the appropriateness of transfer to acute care.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of integration between acute and palliative care have negative consequences for patients (fragmented care), health care professionals (ethical stress), and the health care system (inadequate use of resources).

摘要

未加标签

癌症护理的发展带来了生存和生活质量的提高。急性和姑息治疗的整合是理想的,但并不总是能够实现。分散的护理与沟通和协作不理想有关,导致不必要的护理过渡。本研究旨在探讨在为同时接受积极癌症治疗和在家接受专门姑息治疗的患者提供护理时,来自急性和姑息治疗的医疗保健专业人员如何看待临床决策。

方法

定性探索性设计,使用基于患者病例的在线焦点小组访谈,参与者为医疗保健专业人员(医生和护士),并采用框架分析。

结果

进行了六次在线焦点小组访谈。几乎没有发现系统整合的迹象,这存在护理分散的风险,并使患者处于脆弱的境地。与任务和治疗目标相关的不同方面的不确定性影响了临床决策。组织因素似乎阻碍了相互的临床决策以及与责任相关的不确定性。这些不确定性似乎是及时进行临终对话和关于最佳护理的临床决策的障碍,例如,是否适合转至急性护理。

结论

急性和姑息治疗之间缺乏整合对患者(护理分散)、医疗保健专业人员(伦理压力)和医疗保健系统(资源利用不足)都有负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/9737093/a7a59a272c6e/ijerph-19-16134-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/9737093/1fabfc55590c/ijerph-19-16134-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/9737093/cf576cd668f1/ijerph-19-16134-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/9737093/a7a59a272c6e/ijerph-19-16134-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/9737093/1fabfc55590c/ijerph-19-16134-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/9737093/cf576cd668f1/ijerph-19-16134-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/9737093/a7a59a272c6e/ijerph-19-16134-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Health Care Professionals' Perceptions Regarding Shared Clinical Decision-Making in Both Acute and Palliative Cancer Care.探索医疗保健专业人员对急性和姑息治疗癌症护理中共同临床决策的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316134.
2
Shared decision-making at the end of life: A focus group study exploring the perceptions and experiences of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals working in the home setting.生命末期的共同决策:一项探索家庭环境中多学科医疗保健专业人员的看法和经验的焦点小组研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):123-132. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734434. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
Initiating decision-making conversations in palliative care: an ethnographic discourse analysis.在姑息治疗中开展决策对话:一项人种志话语分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Dec 23;13:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-63. eCollection 2014.
4
Palliative care nursing involvement in end-of-life decision-making: Qualitative secondary analysis.姑息护理护理在临终决策中的参与:定性二次分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1680-1695. doi: 10.1177/0969733018774610. Epub 2018 May 28.
5
End-of-life and palliative care of patients on maintenance hemodialysis treatment: a focus group study.维持性血液透析患者的终末期和姑息治疗:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 30;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0481-y.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.
8
What matters in clinical trial decision-making: a systematic review of interviews exploring cancer patients' experiences.临床试验决策中的关键因素:对探索癌症患者经历的访谈进行的系统评价
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Jun;33(2):266-278. doi: 10.1111/scs.12637. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
9
Patient participation in palliative care decisions: An ethnographic discourse analysis.患者参与姑息治疗决策:一项人种志话语分析
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Nov 22;11:32438. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.32438. eCollection 2016.
10
Talking together in rural palliative care: a qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in Norway.在农村姑息治疗中交谈:挪威一项关于跨专业合作的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07713-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Postgraduate Medical Education: The Role of Disease-Centered Beliefs.研究生医学教育中实施共同决策的障碍:以疾病为中心的信念的作用。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jul 25;14(1):436-446. doi: 10.5334/pme.1465. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care utilization at end of life among patients with lung or pancreatic cancer. Comparison between two Swedish cohorts.终末期肺癌和胰腺癌患者的医疗保健利用。两个瑞典队列的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254673. eCollection 2021.
2
Factors associated with healthcare utilisation during first year after cancer diagnose-a population-based study.癌症诊断后第一年医疗保健利用的相关因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Mar;30(2):e13361. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13361. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Trends in cancer survival in the Nordic countries 1990-2016: the NORDCAN survival studies.
北欧国家 1990-2016 年癌症生存趋势:NORDCAN 生存研究。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Nov;59(11):1266-1274. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1822544. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
5
Views From Patients With Cancer in the Setting of Unplanned Acute Care: Informing Approaches to Reduce Health Care Utilization.癌症患者在非计划急性护理环境中的观点:为减少医疗保健利用提供方法依据。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Nov;16(11):e1291-e1303. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00013. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
6
Advance care planning for patients with cancer in palliative care: A scoping review from a professional perspective.姑息治疗中癌症患者的预先医疗照护计划:从专业角度的范围综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2069-2082. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15216. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
Anticancer therapy within the last 30 days of life: results of an audit and re-audit cycle from an Australian regional cancer centre.生命最后 30 天内的抗癌治疗:来自澳大利亚区域癌症中心的审计和再审计周期的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jan 27;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0517-3.
8
[When to Stop Oncological Treatment in Palliative Patients - an Increasing Challenge in Times of Immunooncology].姑息治疗患者何时停止肿瘤治疗——免疫肿瘤时代日益严峻的挑战
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2020 Jan;55(1):27-40. doi: 10.1055/a-0862-4755. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
Assessing the utilization of the decision to implement a palliative goal for the treatment of cancer patients during the last year of life at Helsinki University Hospital: a historic cohort study.评估在赫尔辛基大学医院癌症患者生命的最后一年中实施姑息治疗目标决策的利用情况:一项历史性队列研究。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Dec;58(12):1699-1705. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1659512. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Patient-reported perceptions of care after the introduction of a new advanced cancer nursing role in Sweden.患者对瑞典引入新的高级癌症护理角色后的护理感知。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;41:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jun 1.