• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前创伤患者在脊髓运动限制下的头颈部运动:一项初步研究。

Head-Neck Motion in Prehospital Trauma Patients under Spinal Motion Restriction: A Pilot Study.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):117-124. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1727591. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1080/10903127.2020.1727591
PMID:32045315
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal precautions are intended to limit motion of potentially unstable spinal segments. The efficacy of various treatment approaches for motion restriction in the cervical spine has been rigorously investigated using healthy volunteers and, to a lesser extent, cadaver samples. No previous studies have objectively measured this motion in trauma patients with potential spine injuries during prehospital care. The purpose of this study was to characterize head-neck (H-N) kinematics in a sample of trauma patients receiving spinal precautions in the field. This was a prospective observational study of trauma patients in the prehospital setting. Trauma patients meeting criteria for spinal precautions were eligible for inclusion. Participants received usual care, consisting of either a long backboard, cervical collar, and head blocks (BC) or a cervical collar only (CO), and behavior was categorized as compliant (C) or non-compliant (N). Three inertial measurement units (IMUs), placed on each participant's forehead, sternum, and stretcher, yielded data on H-N motion. Outcomes were described in terms of H-N displacement and acceleration, including single- and multi-planar values, root mean square (RMS), and bouts of continuous motion above pre-determined thresholds. Data were analyzed to compare H-N motion by phase of prehospital care, as well as treatment type and patient behavior.

RESULTS

Substantial single- and multi-plane H-N motion was observed among all participants. Maximum single-plane displacements were between 11.3 ± 3.0 degrees (rotation) and 19.0 ± 16.6 degrees (flexion-extension). Maximum multi-plane displacements averaged 31.2 ± 7.2 degrees (range: 7.2 to 82.1 degrees). Maximum multi-plane acceleration averaged 5.8 ± 1.4 m/s (range: 1.2 to 19.9 m/s). There were no significant differences among participants between prehospital phase and treatment type. Non-compliant participants showed significantly more motion than compliant participants. Among actual patients, movement appears to be greater than previously recorded in simulation studies, and to be associated with patient behavior. Miniature IMUs are a feasible approach to field-based measurement of H-N kinematics in trauma patients. Future research should evaluate the effects of patient compliance, treatment, and phase of care using larger samples. spinal immobilization; cervical spine; cervical collar; long backboard.

摘要

背景

脊柱预防措施旨在限制潜在不稳定脊柱节段的运动。已经使用健康志愿者以及在较小程度上使用尸体样本对各种限制颈椎运动的治疗方法的疗效进行了严格的研究。以前没有研究在接受院前护理的潜在脊柱损伤的创伤患者中客观测量过这种运动。本研究的目的是描述在接受现场脊柱预防措施的创伤患者中头颈部(H-N)运动学的特征。这是一项对院前环境中创伤患者的前瞻性观察研究。符合脊柱预防措施标准的创伤患者有资格入组。参与者接受常规护理,包括长背板、颈圈和头部固定器(BC)或仅颈圈(CO),行为分为依从(C)或不依从(N)。三个惯性测量单元(IMU)分别放置在每个参与者的额头、胸骨和担架上,产生 H-N 运动的数据。结果以 H-N 位移和加速度来描述,包括单平面和多平面值、均方根(RMS)和超过预定阈值的连续运动发作。通过院前护理阶段、治疗类型和患者行为来比较 H-N 运动。

结果

所有参与者均观察到明显的单平面和多平面 H-N 运动。最大单平面位移为 11.3±3.0 度(旋转)和 19.0±16.6 度(屈伸)之间。平均最大多平面位移为 31.2±7.2 度(范围:7.2 至 82.1 度)。最大多平面加速度平均为 5.8±1.4 m/s(范围:1.2 至 19.9 m/s)。参与者在院前阶段和治疗类型之间没有显著差异。不依从的参与者比依从的参与者表现出明显更多的运动。在实际患者中,运动似乎比模拟研究中记录的更大,并与患者行为有关。微型 IMU 是一种可行的方法,可以在创伤患者中进行基于现场的 H-N 运动学测量。未来的研究应该使用更大的样本量评估患者依从性、治疗和护理阶段的影响。脊柱固定;颈椎;颈圈;长背板。

相似文献

1
Head-Neck Motion in Prehospital Trauma Patients under Spinal Motion Restriction: A Pilot Study.院前创伤患者在脊髓运动限制下的头颈部运动:一项初步研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):117-124. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1727591. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Effects of Spinal Immobilization and Spinal Motion Restriction on Head-Neck Kinematics during Ambulance Transport.脊柱固定和限制脊柱活动对救护车转运过程中头颈部运动学的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):811-819. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1584833. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
3
Prehospital Spinal Immobilization: Effect of Effort on Kinematics of Voluntary Head-neck Motion Assessed using Accelerometry.院前脊柱固定:用力对使用加速度计评估的自主头颈运动运动学的影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Feb;31(1):36-42. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1500552X. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
[Transport of severely injured trauma patients in an ambulance with and without a rigid neck orthosis: comparative biomechanical measurements].[在有和没有刚性颈部矫形器的救护车中运送重伤创伤患者:比较生物力学测量]
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Oct;73(10):668-675. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01462-w. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
5
Prehospital Cervical Spine Motion: Immobilization Versus Spine Motion Restriction.院前颈椎活动:固定与脊柱活动限制
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Sep-Oct;22(5):630-636. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1431341. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
6
[The position of the head during treatment in the emergency room-an explorative analysis of immobilization of the cervical spine].[急诊室治疗期间头部的位置——颈椎固定的探索性分析]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Nov;70(11):922-927. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-00965-0. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services.分析在紧急医疗服务中病人转运过程中的颈椎固定。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun;47(3):719-726. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01143-z. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
8
Spinal motion restriction: an educational and implementation program to redefine prehospital spinal assessment and care.脊柱活动限制:一项重新定义院前脊柱评估与护理的教育及实施计划。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):429-32. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.869643. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
9
Cervical Spine Motion During Vehicle Extrication of Healthy Volunteers.健康志愿者在车辆解救过程中的颈椎运动
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):712-720. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1695298. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
Does the novel lateral trauma position cause more motion in an unstable cervical spine injury than the logroll maneuver?与滚动法相比,新型侧方创伤体位是否会在不稳定型颈椎损伤中引起更多的脊柱活动?
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;35(11):1630-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal Motion Restriction for Possible Traumatic Cervical Spine Injury: A Scoping Review.针对可能的创伤性颈椎损伤的脊柱活动限制:一项范围综述。
Cureus. 2025 May 19;17(5):e84393. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84393. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Development and validation of assessment instruments for cervical collar and spinal board placement in simulated environments for nursing students in the care of polytrauma patients.用于护理专业学生在护理多发伤患者时在模拟环境中放置颈托和脊柱板的评估工具的开发与验证
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06061-2.
3
Paramedic attitudes towards prehospital spinal care: a cross-sectional survey.
急救员对院前脊柱护理的态度:一项横断面调查。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00717-2.
4
Removal of the cervical collar from alpine rescue protocols? A biomechanical non-inferiority trial in real-life mountain conditions.从高山救援协议中去除颈托?现实山地条件下的生物力学非劣效性试验。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 27;30(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01031-3.
5
Effect of a cervical collar on head and neck acceleration profiles during emergency spinal immobilisation and extrication procedures in elite football (soccer) players: protocol for a randomised, controlled cross-over trial.精英足球运动员在紧急脊柱固定和解救过程中颈托对头部和颈部加速度曲线的影响:一项随机对照交叉试验方案
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Dec 27;7(4):e001157. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001157. eCollection 2021.