Center for Epigenetic Research in Child Health and Brain Development, Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, HSF3, room 9-171, 670 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Center for Epigenetic Research in Child Health and Brain Development, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, HSF3, room 9-171, 670 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Microbiome. 2020 Feb 11;8(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-0791-6.
BACKGROUND: Dietary effects on the gut microbiome play key roles in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and behavioral dysregulation. Often overlooked in such studies is the consideration that experimental diets vary significantly in the proportion and source of their dietary fiber. Commonly, treatment comparisons are made between animals fed a purchased refined diet that lacks soluble fiber and animals fed a standard vivarium-provided chow diet that contains a rich source of soluble fiber. Despite the well-established critical role of soluble fiber as the source of short chain fatty acid production via the gut microbiome, the extent to which measured outcomes are driven by differences in dietary fiber is unclear. Further, the interaction between sex and age in response to dietary transition is likely important and should also be considered. RESULTS: We compared the impact of transitioning young adult and 1-year aged male and female mice from their standard chow diet to a refined low soluble fiber diet on gut microbiota community composition. Then, to determine the contribution of dietary fat, we also examined the impact of transitioning a subset of animals from refined low-fat to refined high-fat diet. We used a serial sampling strategy coupled with 16S rRNA marker gene sequencing to examine consequences of recurrent dietary switching on gut microbiota community dynamics. Analysis revealed that the transition from a chow diet to a refined diet that lacks soluble fiber accounted for most of the variance in community structure, diversity, and composition across all groups. This dietary transition was characterized by a loss of taxa within the phylum Bacteroidetes and expansion of Clostridia and Proteobacteria in a sex- and age-specific manner. Most notably, no changes to gut microbiota community structure and composition were observed between mice consuming either refined low- or high-fat diet, suggesting that transition to the refined diet that lacks soluble fiber is the primary driver of gut microbiota alterations, with limited additional impact of dietary fat on gut microbiota. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our results show that the choice of control diet has a significant impact on outcomes and interpretation related to diet effects on gut microbiota. As the reduction of soluble fiber may influence synthesis of microbial metabolites that are important for regulating metabolic, immune, behavioral, and neurobiological outcomes, additional studies are now needed to fully delineate the contribution of fat and fiber on the gut microbiome. Video Abtract.
背景:饮食对肠道微生物组的影响在炎症性疾病、代谢综合征、肥胖和行为失调的病理生理学中起着关键作用。在这些研究中,往往忽略了一个事实,即实验饮食在膳食纤维的比例和来源上有很大的差异。通常,研究人员将接受购买的精制饮食(缺乏可溶性纤维)和接受标准实验室提供的富含可溶性纤维的标准饲料的动物进行治疗比较。尽管可溶性纤维作为肠道微生物组产生短链脂肪酸的来源具有重要作用,但测量结果在多大程度上受膳食纤维差异的驱动尚不清楚。此外,饮食转换对性别和年龄的相互作用可能很重要,也应该考虑到。
结果:我们比较了将年轻成年和 1 岁的雄性和雌性小鼠从标准饲料转换为精制低可溶性纤维饮食对肠道微生物群落组成的影响。然后,为了确定膳食脂肪的贡献,我们还检查了将一部分动物从低脂肪精制饮食转换为高脂肪精制饮食的影响。我们使用了一个连续采样策略,结合 16S rRNA 标记基因测序,来研究反复饮食转换对肠道微生物群落动态的影响。分析表明,从标准饲料饮食向缺乏可溶性纤维的精制饮食的转变解释了所有组中群落结构、多样性和组成的大部分差异。这种饮食转变的特点是在性别和年龄特异性的方式下,厚壁菌门内的分类群减少,梭菌和变形菌的扩张。值得注意的是,食用低脂肪或高脂肪精制饮食的小鼠之间的肠道微生物群落结构和组成没有变化,这表明向缺乏可溶性纤维的精制饮食的转变是肠道微生物群改变的主要驱动因素,而膳食纤维对肠道微生物群的影响有限。
结论:总的来说,我们的结果表明,对照饮食的选择对与饮食对肠道微生物群的影响相关的结果和解释有重大影响。由于可溶性纤维的减少可能会影响微生物代谢物的合成,这些代谢物对调节代谢、免疫、行为和神经生物学结果很重要,因此现在需要进行更多的研究来充分阐明脂肪和纤维对肠道微生物组的贡献。视频摘要。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016-10-27
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018-10-25
Mol Metab. 2016-10-13
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025-9
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025-7-22
Sports Med. 2025-1-8
Brief Bioinform. 2024-9-23
Antioxidants (Basel). 2024-8-14
Gut Microbes. 2016-7-3
Nat Methods. 2016-7
Nat Neurosci. 2015-10
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015-10-1
Nat Commun. 2014-7-29