Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):30-35. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055368. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
Many smokers who begin using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) report vaping in settings where they would not have smoked and believe secondhand aerosol (SHA) is simply steam. However, current understanding of how ENDS users differentiate between secondhand smoke and SHA, or how vaping norms develop, is limited.
We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 39 current ENDS users (dual users and former smokers, now exclusive ENDS users) from New Zealand to explore participants' perceptions of SHA. We probed how these perceptions arose and examined implications for vaping practices and policy. We managed the data using NVivo V.11 and used a thematic analysis approach to interpret the transcripts.
Participants had limited understanding of SHA, its constituents or its possible effects on others. They drew on the absence of harm information, and their sensory experiences and perceptions of others' views of vaping, to support the conclusion that SHA posed few, if any, risks to bystanders. Yet despite this perception, some felt they should recognise others' rights to clean air and most would not vape around children to avoid setting an example.
In the absence of trusted information, participants used sensory heuristics to rationalise their ENDS practices. Policy-makers face the challenge of correcting misperceptions about SHA without deterring full transition from smoking to ENDS use. They could consider including vaping in current smoke-free area policies; this measure would signal that SHA is not harmless, and could protect clean-air settings and reduce potential normalisation of vaping among non-smokers.
许多开始使用电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的吸烟者报告说,他们在不会吸烟的环境中吸电子烟,并认为二手气溶胶(SHA)只是蒸汽。然而,目前对于ENDS 用户如何区分二手烟和 SHA,或者 vaping 规范如何发展的理解有限。
我们对来自新西兰的 39 名当前 ENDS 用户(双重用户和前吸烟者,现在是纯 ENDS 用户)进行了深入的半结构化访谈,以探讨参与者对 SHA 的看法。我们探究了这些看法是如何产生的,并考察了对 vaping 实践和政策的影响。我们使用 NVivo V.11 管理数据,并采用主题分析方法来解释转录本。
参与者对 SHA 的组成部分及其可能对他人的影响知之甚少。他们利用缺乏危害信息,以及他们的感官体验和对他人对 vaping 看法的看法,得出结论认为 SHA 对旁观者几乎没有风险。尽管有这种看法,但有些人认为他们应该承认他人享有清洁空气的权利,而且大多数人不会在儿童周围吸电子烟,以免树立榜样。
在缺乏可信信息的情况下,参与者使用感官启发式来合理化他们的 ENDS 实践。政策制定者面临的挑战是纠正对 SHA 的误解,而不会阻止从吸烟完全过渡到使用 ENDS。他们可以考虑将 vaping 纳入当前的无烟区政策;这一措施将表明 SHA 并非无害,并且可以保护清洁空气的环境,并减少非吸烟者对 vaping 的潜在正常化。