Suppr超能文献

新西兰电子烟用户信息搜索行为的定性探索

A qualitative exploration of information-seeking by electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) users in New Zealand.

机构信息

Cancer Society Social and Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 25;8(10):e023375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023375.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Given recent increases in awareness and uptake of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), we aimed to explore ENDS users' information needs and search behaviours and whether information gaps exist.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews that probed participants' smoking behaviours and ENDS use; data in this study examine ENDS information-seeking behaviours. We used qualitative description to analyse interview transcripts.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

We recruited 39 current ENDS users (20 dual users and 19 exclusive ENDS users who reported having previously smoked cigarettes regularly) aged 18 and over, from three urban centres in New Zealand.

RESULTS

Several participants used Google to search for information on ENDS' health effects, but described the material they retrieved as vague or contradictory. Some interpreted the absence of information on long-term health effects as evidence ENDS did not pose potential health risks, and several perceived e-liquids as benign. Many relied on information sourced from other ENDS users, gleaned from online forums, YouTube or from discussions with friends and acquaintances; these sources typically presented ENDS positively. Several participants found specialist ENDS retailers provided valuable advice; non-specialist store staff generally lacked detailed product knowledge and sometimes offered inaccurate information.

CONCLUSION

People seeking information on ENDS' health effects are more likely to retrieve recommendations, product reviews and endorsements from online sources or through exchanges with other users, than they are to find scientific data. Health authorities could help meet potential users' information needs by, first, creating and frequently updating objective lay summaries of the latest scientific evidence; second, by mandating licensing for retailers with guidelines to disclose uncertainty over ENDS' efficacy for cessation and longer-term health effects, and the need for complete substitution of ENDS for combustible cigarettes among those who use these products.

摘要

目的

鉴于最近人们对电子烟的认识和使用有所增加,我们旨在探讨电子烟使用者的信息需求和搜索行为,以及是否存在信息差距。

设计

使用半结构化访谈进行定性研究,探究参与者的吸烟行为和电子烟使用情况;本研究中的数据检查了电子烟信息搜索行为。我们使用定性描述来分析访谈记录。

参与者和设置

我们从新西兰的三个城市中心招募了 39 名当前的电子烟使用者(20 名双重使用者和 19 名仅使用电子烟的使用者,他们报告曾定期吸烟),年龄在 18 岁及以上。

结果

一些参与者使用谷歌搜索电子烟健康影响的信息,但他们描述说检索到的信息模糊或相互矛盾。一些人将缺乏关于长期健康影响的信息解释为电子烟没有潜在健康风险的证据,并且一些人认为电子烟液是良性的。许多人依赖于从其他电子烟使用者那里获取的信息,这些信息来自在线论坛、YouTube 或与朋友和熟人的讨论;这些来源通常对电子烟给予正面评价。一些参与者发现电子烟专卖店提供了有价值的建议;非专卖店的店员通常缺乏详细的产品知识,有时会提供不准确的信息。

结论

寻求电子烟健康影响信息的人更有可能从在线来源或与其他用户的交流中检索到建议、产品评论和推荐,而不是找到科学数据。卫生当局可以通过以下方式满足潜在用户的信息需求:首先,创建并定期更新最新科学证据的客观通俗摘要;其次,通过授权零售商,零售商需要有指导方针来披露电子烟对戒烟和长期健康影响的效果的不确定性,以及需要完全用电子烟替代那些使用这些产品的人的可燃香烟。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验