• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚吸烟参与率的价格弹性:按年龄和社会经济水平的估计。

Price smoking participation elasticity in Colombia: estimates by age and socioeconomic level.

机构信息

Facultad de Economía, Universidad Del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia

Facultad de Economía, Universidad Del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):36-41. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055186. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055186
PMID:32047102
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tobacco prevalence in Colombia is small compared with other Latin America despite the nation's tobacco taxes being among the lowest in the region. However, tobacco taxes have increased several times during the last decade, and large increases in 2010 and 2016 impacted consumer prices.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to estimate the price smoking participation elasticity (PPE) in Colombia, with specific reference to regional increases in consumer prices after 2010 tax policy changes.

METHODS

The PPE is computed using logistic regression based on individual-level data from the National Psychoactive Substances Consumption Survey for 2008 and 2013. Our specific focus is state-level variation in Colombian cigarette prices between 2008 and 2013 induced by the tax hike in 2010.

RESULTS

The estimated PPE in Colombia is around -0.66 (p value=0.046). We find almost no differences across socioeconomic level, but price sensitivity was greater for women than men, and for relatively older individuals (ages 51-64).

CONCLUSIONS

PPE for Colombia is above estimates for comparable middle-income countries such as Mexico. As a result, current estimates for health gains of tax policies are likely to be underestimated. Moreover, in contrast with the literature, we find that the PPE for the youth (≤25 years) is lower than older age groups, and there is no evidence of a prominent socio-economic status (SES) gradient.

摘要

背景

尽管哥伦比亚的烟草税在该地区是最低的,但与其他拉丁美洲国家相比,哥伦比亚的烟草流行率较小。然而,在过去十年中,烟草税已经多次增加,2010 年和 2016 年的大幅增加影响了消费者价格。

目的

本文旨在估计哥伦比亚的价格吸烟参与弹性(PPE),特别是针对 2010 年税收政策变化后消费者价格的地区性上涨。

方法

使用基于个体水平数据的逻辑回归来计算 PPE,数据来自 2008 年和 2013 年的全国精神活性物质消费调查。我们的具体关注点是 2008 年至 2013 年期间,由于 2010 年的税收增加,哥伦比亚香烟价格在各州之间的变化。

结果

估计哥伦比亚的 PPE 约为-0.66(p 值=0.046)。我们发现,社会经济水平之间几乎没有差异,但女性比男性以及相对年龄较大的个体(51-64 岁)对价格的敏感度更高。

结论

哥伦比亚的 PPE 高于墨西哥等类似中等收入国家的估计值。因此,当前对税收政策健康收益的估计可能被低估了。此外,与文献相反,我们发现年轻人(≤25 岁)的 PPE 低于年龄较大的群体,并且没有明显的社会经济地位(SES)梯度的证据。

相似文献

1
Price smoking participation elasticity in Colombia: estimates by age and socioeconomic level.哥伦比亚吸烟参与率的价格弹性:按年龄和社会经济水平的估计。
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):36-41. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055186. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
2
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
3
Effectiveness of tax policy changes in Montenegro: smoking behaviour by socio-economic status.黑山税收政策变化的效果:按社会经济地位划分的吸烟行为。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s124-s132. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056876. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
4
Price, Income, and Affordability as the Determinants of Tobacco Consumption: A Practitioner's Guide to Tobacco Taxation.价格、收入和可负担性对烟草消费的影响:烟草税的实用指南。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):40-47. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa134.
5
Distributional health and financial benefits of increased tobacco taxes in Colombia: results from a modelling study.提高哥伦比亚烟草税对健康和财政的影响:模型研究结果。
Tob Control. 2019 Jul;28(4):374-380. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054378. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Smoke signals: monitoring illicit cigarettes and smoking behaviour in Colombia to support tobacco taxes.烟雾信号:监测哥伦比亚的非法香烟和吸烟行为,以支持烟草税。
Tob Control. 2020 Oct;29(Suppl 4):s243-s248. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054820. Epub 2019 May 4.
7
Price and income elasticity of cigarette demand in Bosnia and Herzegovina by different socioeconomic groups.波黑不同社会经济群体的香烟需求价格和收入弹性。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s101-s109. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056881. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
8
Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking.比较香烟最低限价和消费税政策对吸烟方面社会经济差异的预期影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i60-i66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053230.
9
Tobacco price elasticity in Serbia: evidence from a middle-income country with high prevalence and low tobacco prices.塞尔维亚的烟草价格弹性:高流行率和低烟草价格的中等收入国家的证据。
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s331-s336. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055262. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Raising cigarette excise tax to reduce consumption in low-and middle-income countries of the Asia-Pacific region:a simulation of the anticipated health and taxation revenues impacts.提高亚太地区中低收入国家的烟草消费税以减少消费:对预期健康和税收收入影响的模拟。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):1187. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6096-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco price elasticity by socioeconomic characteristics in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔社会经济特征与烟草价格弹性。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 19;19(4):e0302293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302293. eCollection 2024.
2
Socioeconomic differences in the impact of prices and taxes on tobacco use in low- and middle-income countries-A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家价格与税收对烟草使用影响的社会经济差异——一项系统综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 27;3(9):e0002342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002342. eCollection 2023.
3
Modelling the Reduction in Cancer Incidence After Variations in the Prevalence of Tobacco Consumption in Colombia in the Period 2016-2050.
建模 2016-2050 年期间哥伦比亚烟草消费流行率变化对癌症发病率降低的影响。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221121390. doi: 10.1177/10732748221121390.
4
Tobacco industry pricing strategies for single cigarettes and multistick packs after excise tax increases in Colombia.哥伦比亚提高消费税之后,烟草业对单支香烟和多支装香烟的定价策略。
Tob Control. 2023 Dec 13;33(1):59-66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2022-057333.
5
Quantile regression of tobacco tax pass-through in the UK 2013-2019. How have manufacturers passed through tax changes for different tobacco products?英国 2013-2019 年烟草税税负转嫁的分位数回归。制造商如何对不同烟草产品的税收变化进行转嫁?
Tob Control. 2021 Nov;30(e1):e27-e32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055931. Epub 2020 Oct 22.