Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Edificio C2, Piso-3 Campo Grande, 1749016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (CNRS-Université de Montpellier-IRD-EPHE), 34095, CEDEX 5, Montpellier, France.
Heredity (Edinb). 2020 Apr;124(4):603-617. doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-0297-9. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
Although the diversity of bacterial endosymbionts in arthropods is well documented, whether and how such diversity is maintained remains an open question. We investigated the temporal changes occurring in the prevalence and composition of endosymbionts after transferring natural populations of Tetranychus spider mites from the field to the laboratory. These populations, belonging to three different Tetranychus species (T. urticae, T. ludeni and T. evansi) carried variable infection frequencies of Wolbachia, Cardinium, and Rickettsia. We report a rapid change of the infection status of these populations after only 6 months of laboratory rearing, with an apparent loss of Rickettsia and Cardinium, while Wolbachia apparently either reached fixation or was lost. We show that Wolbachia had variable effects on host longevity and fecundity, and induced variable levels of cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) in each fully infected population, despite no sequence divergence in the markers used and full CI rescue between all populations. This suggests that such effects are largely dependent upon the host genotype. Subsequently, we used these data to parameterize a theoretical model for the invasion of CI-inducing symbionts in haplodiploids, which shows that symbiont effects are sufficient to explain their dynamics in the laboratory. This further suggests that symbiont diversity and prevalence in the field are likely maintained by environmental heterogeneity, which is reduced in the laboratory. Overall, this study highlights the lability of endosymbiont infections and draws attention to the limitations of laboratory studies to understand host-symbiont interactions in natural populations.
尽管节肢动物体内共生细菌的多样性已得到充分证实,但这种多样性是否以及如何得以维持仍未解决。我们通过将田间自然种群的叶螨转移到实验室,研究了这些种群在共生体的流行和组成方面发生的时间变化。这些种群属于三个不同的叶螨物种(Tetranychus urticae、Tetranychus ludeni 和 Tetranychus evansi),携带不同频率的沃尔巴克氏体、卡多体和立克次氏体感染。我们报告称,在实验室饲养仅 6 个月后,这些种群的感染状况迅速发生变化,明显失去了立克次氏体和卡多体,而沃尔巴克氏体显然要么达到固定状态,要么丢失。我们表明,沃尔巴克氏体对宿主的寿命和繁殖力有不同的影响,并在每个完全感染的种群中诱导不同程度的细胞质不亲和性(CI),尽管使用的标记没有序列差异,并且所有种群之间都能完全挽救 CI。这表明这些影响在很大程度上取决于宿主的基因型。随后,我们使用这些数据来参数化一个理论模型,用于研究在单倍二倍体中诱导 CI 的共生体的入侵,该模型表明共生体的效应足以解释它们在实验室中的动态。这进一步表明,共生体的多样性和在野外的流行率可能是由环境异质性维持的,而实验室中的环境异质性降低。总的来说,这项研究强调了内生共生体感染的不稳定性,并提请注意实验室研究在理解自然种群中宿主-共生体相互作用方面的局限性。