Winn Lara, Cornelius Randolph
Psychology, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States.
Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 28;11:20. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00020. eCollection 2020.
Objectification theorists posit that exposure to sexually objectifying behavior, images, etc., leads women in particular to adopt an objectifying self-perspective. State self-objectification (SSO) (i.e., the internalization of the objectifying gaze) is theorized to usurp individuals' cognitive resources by diverting attention to their bodies. The objective of this paper is to systematically review the literature surrounding self-objectification and cognitive performance. Six databases retrieved 1,779 relevant articles. Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion if they (a) quantitatively investigated the relationship between SSO and cognitive performance using valid and reliable measures, (b) were published in a peer-reviewed journal between 1997 and 2019, inclusive, and (c) were available in English. Nine studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. As the heterogeneity of the literature precluded meta-analysis, narrative synthesis was employed to review the results. While the quality of the studies was mixed, the results of our review support the contention that self-objectification impairs cognitive functioning. Appearance monitoring, actual-ideal self-discrepancies, negative self-conscious emotions, gender schema activation, and stereotype activation are evaluated as potential mechanisms behind the relationship between state self-objectification and cognitive performance, while chronic (trait) self-objectification is evaluated as a potential moderator.
客体化理论学家认为,接触性客体化行为、图像等,尤其会导致女性采取一种客体化的自我视角。状态自我客体化(SSO)(即客体化凝视的内化)被理论化为通过将注意力转移到身体上,从而侵占个体的认知资源。本文的目的是系统回顾围绕自我客体化与认知表现的文献。六个数据库检索到1779篇相关文章。如果研究(a)使用有效且可靠的测量方法对状态自我客体化与认知表现之间的关系进行了定量研究,(b)发表于1997年至2019年(含)期间的同行评审期刊,且(c)有英文版本,则被认为符合纳入标准。九项研究符合所有纳入标准。由于文献的异质性排除了进行荟萃分析的可能性,因此采用叙述性综合分析来回顾研究结果。虽然研究质量参差不齐,但我们的综述结果支持自我客体化会损害认知功能这一观点。外表监控、现实与理想自我差异、消极的自我意识情绪、性别图式激活和刻板印象激活被评估为状态自我客体化与认知表现之间关系背后的潜在机制,而慢性(特质)自我客体化则被评估为一种潜在的调节因素。