• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期决策:印度一家三级护理教学医院的回顾性研究。

End-of-life decisions: A retrospective study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 2019 Dec;150(6):598-605. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1409_17.

DOI:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1409_17
PMID:32048623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7038812/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: In developing countries like India, there is a lack of clarity regarding the factors that influence decisions pertaining to life supports at the end-of-life (EOL). The objectives of this study were to assess the factors associated with EOL-care decisions in the Indian context and to raise awareness in this area of healthcare.

METHODS

This retrospectively study included all patients admitted to the medical unit of a tertiary care hospital in southern India, over one year and died. The baseline demographics, economic, physiological, sociological, prognostic and medical treatment-related factors were retrieved from the patient's medical records and analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 122 decedents included in the study whose characteristics were analyzed, 41 (33.6%) received full life support and 81 (66.4%) had withdrawal or withholding of some life support measure. Amongst those who had withdrawal or withholding of life support, 62 (76.5%) had some support withheld and in 19 (23.5%), it was withdrawn. The documentation of the disease process, prognosis and the mention of imminent death in the medical records was the single most important factor that was associated with the EOL decision (odds ratio - 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.74; P=0.03).

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The documentation of poor prognosis was the only factor found to be associated with EOL care decisions in our study. Prospective, multicentric studies need to be done to evaluate the influence of various other factors on the EOL care.

摘要

背景与目的

在印度等发展中国家,对于影响生命末期(EOL)支持决策的因素,尚缺乏明确性。本研究的目的是评估与印度 EOL 护理决策相关的因素,并提高在这一医疗保健领域的意识。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了在印度南部一家三级护理医院的医疗病房住院一年以上并死亡的所有患者。从患者的病历中检索并分析了基线人口统计学、经济、生理、社会学、预后和医疗治疗相关因素。

结果

在所分析的 122 名死者的特征中,41 名(33.6%)接受了全面生命支持,81 名(66.4%)撤回或停止了一些生命支持措施。在撤回或停止生命支持的患者中,62 名(76.5%)停止了一些支持,19 名(23.5%)完全停止。在病历中记录疾病过程、预后和提及即将死亡,是与 EOL 决策最相关的单一最重要因素(优势比 0.08;95%置信区间,0.01-0.74;P=0.03)。

解释与结论

在我们的研究中,只有记录不良预后这一因素被发现与 EOL 护理决策相关。需要进行前瞻性、多中心研究,以评估各种其他因素对 EOL 护理的影响。

相似文献

1
End-of-life decisions: A retrospective study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.终末期决策:印度一家三级护理教学医院的回顾性研究。
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Dec;150(6):598-605. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1409_17.
2
Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients.《维持生命治疗决定法》对韩国终末期患者临终关怀的影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):917-924. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.740. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment in a Norwegian intensive care unit.挪威重症监护病房中关于停止或撤销维持生命治疗的决策
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Mar;58(3):329-36. doi: 10.1111/aas.12246. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
4
End of life in ICU--care of the dying or 'pulling the plug'?重症监护病房中的临终关怀——对濒死患者的照料还是“拔管”?
Ir Med J. 2006 Apr;99(4):112-4.
5
Admission to intensive care unit at the end-of-life: is it an informed decision?临终时入住重症监护病房:这是一个明智的决定吗?
Palliat Med. 2004 Dec;18(8):705-11. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm959oa.
6
Comparison of the end-of-life decisions of patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia after the enforcement of the life-sustaining treatment decision act in Korea.比较韩国《维持生命治疗决定法》实施后医院获得性肺炎患者的临终决策。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 18;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00931-y.
7
End-of-life care in the ICU: treatments provided when life support was or was not withdrawn.重症监护病房的临终关怀:在撤除或未撤除生命支持时所提供的治疗。
Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1424-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1424.
8
Withholding and withdrawing of life support from patients with severe head injury.对重度颅脑损伤患者生命支持的撤除与 withholding(此处“withholding”结合语境推测意思是“停止给予”之类,因未完整语境较难精准翻译)
Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;23(9):1567-75. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00018.
9
End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: the Irish Ethicus data.重症监护病房中的临终关怀:爱尔兰Ethicus数据。
Crit Care Resusc. 2006 Dec;8(4):315-20.
10
Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments and Associations With Accurate Prognostic Awareness and Depressive Symptoms in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Last Year of Life.晚期癌症患者生命最后一年对维持生命治疗的偏好及其与准确预后认知和抑郁症状的关联
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jan;51(1):41-51.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping end-of-life care in India: a scoping review to identify gaps in policy, practice, and psychosocial support.印度临终关怀服务映射:一项范围综述,以识别政策、实践和心理社会支持方面的差距。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01825-z.
2
Limitations of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Croatia: a multicenter retrospective study.克罗地亚重症监护病房生命维持治疗的局限性:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Croat Med J. 2024 Aug 31;65(4):373-382. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.373.
3
Institutional end-of-life care policy for inpatients at a tertiary care centre in India: A way forward to provide a system for a dignified death.印度一家三级护理中心的住院患者机构临终关怀政策:为有尊严的死亡提供系统的方法。
Indian J Med Res. 2022 Feb;155(2):232-242. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_902_21.
4
End-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Better Late Than Never?重症监护病房中的临终关怀:亡羊补牢,为时未晚?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;24(6):375-377. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23496.

本文引用的文献

1
The DNR Order after 40 Years.40年后的“不要复苏”医嘱。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):504-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605597.
2
Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study.印度的重症监护:印度重症监护病例组合与实践模式研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;20(4):216-25. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.180042.
3
India: not a country to die in.印度:不是一个适合赴死的国家。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2016 Jan-Mar;1(1):30-5. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2016.007.
4
End-of-Life Care Intensity for Physicians, Lawyers, and the General Population.医生、律师和普通人群的临终关怀强度
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):303-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17408.
5
Toward Better ICU Use at the End of Life.改善临终时重症监护病房的使用情况。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):255-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18681.
6
End-of-life care policy: An integrated care plan for the dying: A Joint Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) and the Indian Association of Palliative Care (IAPC).临终关怀政策:一份针对临终患者的综合护理计划:印度重症医学学会(ISCCM)和印度姑息治疗协会(IAPC)联合立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;18(9):615-35. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.140155.
7
End of life care policy for the dying: consensus position statement of Indian association of palliative care.临终关怀政策:印度姑息治疗协会的共识立场声明
Indian J Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;20(3):171-81. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.138384.
8
Preference of the place of death among people of pune.浦那地区人群对死亡地点的偏好。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2014 May;20(2):101-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.132620.
9
Current situation and associated factors of withdrawing or withholding life support to patients in an intensive care unit of cancer center in China.中国某癌症中心重症监护病房对患者撤除或 withholding 生命支持的现状及相关因素(注:原文中“withholding”此处可能有误,正常应是“withholding and withdrawing”,准确翻译为“ withhold (不予提供)和撤除” ,整体翻译为“中国某癌症中心重症监护病房对患者不予提供或撤除生命支持的现状及相关因素” ) 。但按照要求,只给出上述译文。
PLoS One. 2014 May 28;9(5):e98545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098545. eCollection 2014.
10
Factors associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and time to death after withdrawal.与机械通气姑息性撤机相关的因素及撤机后至死亡的时间。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Nov;16(11):1368-74. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0142. Epub 2013 Oct 1.