Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA.
Biostatistics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA.
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Sep;84(3):1592-1604. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28192. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
To demonstrate that constant coefficient of variation (CV), but nonconstant absolute variance in MRI relaxometry (T , T , R , R ) data leads to erroneous conclusions based on standard linear models such as ordinary least squares (OLS). We propose a gamma generalized linear model identity link (GGLM-ID) framework that factors the inherent CV into parameter estimates. We first examined the effects on calculations of contrast agent relaxivity before broadening to other applications such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and liver iron content (LIC).
Eight models including OLS and GGLM-ID were initially fit to data obtained on sulfated dextran iron oxide (SDIO) nanoparticles. Both a resampling simulation on the data as well as two separate Monte Carlo simulations (with and without concentration error) were performed to determine mean square error (MSE) and type I error rate. We then evaluated the performance of OLS/GGLM-ID on R repeatability and LIC data sets.
OLS had an MSE of 4-5× that of GGLM-ID as well as a type I error rate of 20-30%, whereas GGLM-ID was near the nominal 5% level in the relaxivity study. Only OLS found statistically significant effects of MRI facility on relaxivity in an R repeatability study, but no significant differences were found in a resampling, whereas GGLM was more consistent. GGLM-ID was also superior to OLS for modeling LIC.
OLS leads to erroneous conclusions when analyzing MRI relaxometry data. GGLM-ID factors in the inherent CV of an MRI experiment, leading to more reproducible conclusions.
证明在 MRI 弛豫测量(T1、T2、R1、R2)数据中,恒定的变异系数(CV)而非恒定的绝对方差会导致基于标准线性模型(如普通最小二乘法(OLS))得出错误的结论。我们提出了一种伽马广义线性模型恒等链接(GGLM-ID)框架,该框架将内在的 CV 纳入参数估计中。我们首先在拓宽到其他应用(如方差分析(ANOVA)和肝铁含量(LIC)分析)之前,检查了对比剂弛豫率计算的影响。
最初将包括 OLS 和 GGLM-ID 在内的 8 种模型拟合到硫酸葡聚糖氧化铁(SDIO)纳米颗粒上获得的数据。对数据进行重采样模拟以及两次单独的蒙特卡罗模拟(有/无浓度误差),以确定均方误差(MSE)和Ⅰ型错误率。然后,我们评估了 OLS/GGLM-ID 在 R 重复性和 LIC 数据集上的性能。
OLS 的 MSE 是 GGLM-ID 的 4-5 倍,Ⅰ型错误率为 20-30%,而 GGLM-ID 在弛豫率研究中接近名义的 5%水平。只有 OLS 在 R 重复性研究中发现 MRI 设备对弛豫率有统计学意义的影响,但在重采样中没有发现显著差异,而 GGLM 则更一致。对于 LIC 的建模,GGLM-ID 也优于 OLS。
当分析 MRI 弛豫测量数据时,OLS 会导致错误的结论。GGLM-ID 考虑了 MRI 实验的内在 CV,从而得出更具可重复性的结论。